Re: Leaving the Desktop Market

2014-05-05 Thread Matthias Apitz
El día Saturday, May 03, 2014 a las 04:59:48PM -0700, Kevin Oberman escribió: Available is not required. Set it to C8. That guarantees that you will use the lowest available. The correct incantation in rc.conf is Cmax. performance_cx_lowest=Cmax economy_cx_lowest=Cmax But, unless you want

Re: Leaving the Desktop Market

2014-05-05 Thread Stefan Esser
Am 05.05.2014 11:17, schrieb Matthias Apitz: El día Saturday, May 03, 2014 a las 04:59:48PM -0700, Kevin Oberman escribió: Available is not required. Set it to C8. That guarantees that you will use the lowest available. The correct incantation in rc.conf is Cmax. performance_cx_lowest=Cmax

gfortran48: compiler issue with f77 code: configure: error: Fortran 77 compiler cannot create executables

2014-05-05 Thread O. Hartmann
I have some F77 code that compiled fine using the GNU autotool environment, having the macro AC_PROG_F77 in configure.ac. The project compiles fine on Linux Ubuntu 14.04 LTS (gfortran version 4.8). But since a while it doesn't on FreeBSD 9.2/10/11 anymore! I miss something here and I do not

Re: Leaving the Desktop Market

2014-05-05 Thread Matthias Apitz
El día Monday, May 05, 2014 a las 12:09:02PM +0200, Stefan Esser escribió: In the output of: $ sysctl -a | fgrep dev.cpu.0.freq_ dev.cpu.0.freq_levels: 1600/2000 1333/1533 1066/1066 800/600 what does mean the value after the slash .../ ? This is the nominal power consumption

Re: gfortran48: compiler issue with f77 code: configure: error: Fortran 77 compiler cannot create executables

2014-05-05 Thread O. Hartmann
Am Mon, 5 May 2014 12:26:21 +0200 O. Hartmann ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de schrieb: Following some reports and recall myself an earlier issue with this, I remember to have to provide -Wl,-rpath=/usr/local/lib/gcc48 to the FFLAGS. This is also the case for the gcc/gfortran in 11.0-CURRENT which

Re: Leaving the Desktop Market

2014-05-05 Thread Matthias Apitz
El día Monday, May 05, 2014 a las 12:36:08PM +0200, Matthias Apitz escribió: Btw: the values in /etc/rc.conf performance_cx_lowest=Cmax economy_cx_lowest=Cmax to which launched process they belong as config values? Forget the question. The values are used by /etc/rc.d/power_profile

Re: need info about newcons in jails

2014-05-05 Thread Aleksandr Rybalko
On Sat, 03 May 2014 07:15:14 -0400 Fbsd8 fb...@a1poweruser.com wrote: Hello list. Hi, Looking for information about using newcons as the terminal driver in xorg for desktop in a jail. I don't really understand how that can be related. software running in jail doing output to same

Re: need info about newcons in jails

2014-05-05 Thread Erich Dollansky
Hi, On Sat, 03 May 2014 07:15:14 -0400 Fbsd8 fb...@a1poweruser.com wrote: Hello list. Looking for information about using newcons as the terminal driver in xorg for desktop in a jail. Can only find this https://wiki.freebsd.org/Newcons Has anybody gotten it to work in a jail? I just

Re: Leaving the Desktop Market

2014-05-05 Thread John Baldwin
On Sunday, May 04, 2014 4:40:02 pm Adrian Chadd wrote: Hm, I was hoping for a little more discussion. Mostly around the which older CPUs do we leave this on for? crowd. I have Pentium-M class hardware that I was going to spin up -HEAD on. So I'll go install -HEAD on said older hardware and

Re: need info about newcons in jails

2014-05-05 Thread Fbsd8
Aleksandr Rybalko wrote: On Sat, 03 May 2014 07:15:14 -0400 Fbsd8 fb...@a1poweruser.com wrote: Hello list. Hi, Looking for information about using newcons as the terminal driver in xorg for desktop in a jail. I don't really understand how that can be related. software running in jail

CURRENT: jemalloc_jemalloc.c:(.text+0xcb7): relocation truncated to fit: R_X86_64_PC32 against symbol `__je_ctl_boot'

2014-05-05 Thread O. Hartmann
It seems that I can not build anymore a kernel or world. I had an accident in a truncated /usr/libc while installing the last buildworld/kernel with mixed up sources. Is there a way to revert this mess? I think I installed lib/libc with more recent sources than the last installed system (

Should we make WITHOUT_LIB32=yes the default for 11-RELEASE?

2014-05-05 Thread Adam McDougall
On most amd64 systems I run, I usually set WITHOUT_LIB32=yes in /etc/src.conf because I don't need them. This weekend I did a stock install on an older AMD64 Core 2 Duo minipc and a buildworld of 10-STABLE took almost two hours with LIB32 and CLANG since much of it gets compiled twice. Is it

Re: Should we make WITHOUT_LIB32=yes the default for 11-RELEASE?

2014-05-05 Thread Erich Dollansky
Hi, On Mon, 5 May 2014 22:07:06 -0400 Adam McDougall mcdou...@egr.msu.edu wrote: On most amd64 systems I run, I usually set WITHOUT_LIB32=yes in /etc/src.conf because I don't need them. This weekend I did a stock install on an older AMD64 Core 2 Duo minipc and a buildworld of 10-STABLE took