On 22 Mar 2015, at 23:11, Garrett Cooper yaneurab...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mar 22, 2015, at 15:09, Dimitry Andric d...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 22 Mar 2015, at 23:04, Garrett Cooper yaneurab...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mar 22, 2015, at 15:01, Craig Rodrigues rodr...@freebsd.org wrote:
...
OK,
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 3:01 PM, Craig Rodrigues rodr...@freebsd.org
wrote:
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 2:36 PM, Dimitry Andric d...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 22 Mar 2015, at 22:32, Craig Rodrigues rodr...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Dimitry Andric d...@freebsd.org
I have a 4th gen core i3 running PC-BSD 10.1 in which I let the
installer do its thing. It uses zfs for / but it's not encrypted. It
gave me the laptop's native res which I think is 1366 x 768. I have a
4th gen desktop installed the same way which is giving me 1920x1080.
I'm not sure how it
See https://jenkins.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD-tests2/866/
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
On 22 Mar 2015, at 03:45, Mark Millard mar...@dsl-only.net wrote:
...
Looking at the sources suggests that stdarg.h is explicitly in the #include
sequence too late to guarantee va_args a definition at the point of its use
in #include printf.h : stdarg.h is #include'd in pjdlog.c in the line
Dimitry Adnric wrote:
You should be able to include standard headers (or at least, headers in
/usr/include) in any order, and printf.h includes stdio.h, which
then defines the correct types.
Another of the ANSI/ISO-C rules is: You must include a standard header before
you refer to anything
See https://jenkins.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD-tests2/868/
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 07:23:19AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote:
As noted in a thread on -mobile yesterday, I'm replacing my long-serving
Dell M4400 laptop with a newer model (M4800) -- you can see -mobile
archives for additional details if you're interested.
What prompted this note was:
*
On 22 Mar 2015, at 22:02, Craig Rodrigues rodr...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 11:26 AM, jenkins-ad...@freebsd.org wrote:
See https://jenkins.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD-tests2/867/
Can someone with toolchain expertise look at this?
After the clang 3.6.1 import,
On 22 Mar 2015, at 22:23, Dimitry Andric d...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 22 Mar 2015, at 22:02, Craig Rodrigues rodr...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 11:26 AM, jenkins-ad...@freebsd.org wrote:
See https://jenkins.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD-tests2/867/
Can someone with
On Mar 22, 2015, at 14:36, Dimitry Andric d...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 22 Mar 2015, at 22:32, Craig Rodrigues rodr...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Dimitry Andric d...@freebsd.org wrote:
Ah right, that was on i386, on amd64 it does result in -2^63. It is indeed
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 11:26 AM, jenkins-ad...@freebsd.org wrote:
See https://jenkins.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD-tests2/867/
Can someone with toolchain expertise look at this?
After the clang 3.6.1 import, /bin/expr behaves differently.
With clang 3.5.0:
# expr 4611686018427387904 +
On Mar 22, 2015, at 14:02, Craig Rodrigues rodr...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 11:26 AM, jenkins-ad...@freebsd.org wrote:
See https://jenkins.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD-tests2/867/
Can someone with toolchain expertise look at this?
After the clang 3.6.1 import,
On 22 Mar 2015, at 22:32, Craig Rodrigues rodr...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Dimitry Andric d...@freebsd.org wrote:
Ah right, that was on i386, on amd64 it does result in -2^63. It is indeed
caused by reliance on signed integer wrapping.
This diff should fix
See https://jenkins.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD-tests2/867/
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Dimitry Andric d...@freebsd.org wrote:
Ah right, that was on i386, on amd64 it does result in -2^63. It is
indeed caused by reliance on signed integer wrapping.
This diff should fix it, without rewriting the utility:
Index: bin/expr/Makefile
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 2:36 PM, Dimitry Andric d...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 22 Mar 2015, at 22:32, Craig Rodrigues rodr...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Dimitry Andric d...@freebsd.org wrote:
Ah right, that was on i386, on amd64 it does result in -2^63. It is
On Mar 22, 2015, at 15:01, Craig Rodrigues rodr...@freebsd.org wrote:
...
OK, converting expr.y to use unsigned integers would require a bit of work.
Can you commit your patch to the Makefile? It fixes the problem for now.
+1
I’d still like to know why clang 3.5 doesn’t have this behavior
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 12:32 AM, Marek Novotny
marek.novo...@marspolar.com wrote:
Hi group,
New to this group, and new to FreeBSD via PC-BSD. Really like it so far.
Sorry if this has been asked to death already. Levono has their new T450
with the 5th gen intel Broadwell i5 processor. I
ok, then hm, where's the gpio pin configured..
-a
On 21 March 2015 at 21:55, Miguel Clara miguelmcl...@gmail.com wrote:
On March 22, 2015 4:19:23 AM WET, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
Ok, so I'd cycle that rfkill gpio from 1 - uhm, whatever the max for
that thing is (16?)
Each
See https://jenkins.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD-tests2/865/
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
On Mar 21, 2015, at 5:32, Ryan Stone ryst...@gmail.com wrote:
I still see the compile errors that I reported here:
https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2015-February/054803.html
It affects these builds:
sparc64 LINT kernel failed, check _.sparc64.LINT for details
powerpc
On 22 Mar 2015, at 23:04, Garrett Cooper yaneurab...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mar 22, 2015, at 15:01, Craig Rodrigues rodr...@freebsd.org wrote:
...
OK, converting expr.y to use unsigned integers would require a bit of work.
Can you commit your patch to the Makefile? It fixes the problem
On Mar 22, 2015, at 15:09, Dimitry Andric d...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 22 Mar 2015, at 23:04, Garrett Cooper yaneurab...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mar 22, 2015, at 15:01, Craig Rodrigues rodr...@freebsd.org wrote:
...
OK, converting expr.y to use unsigned integers would require a bit of work.
Hi group,
New to this group, and new to FreeBSD via PC-BSD. Really like it so far.
Sorry if this has been asked to death already. Levono has their new T450
with the 5th gen intel Broadwell i5 processor. I bought it with the
hopes of running PC-BSD latest version on it. It uses intel 5500
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 04:32:06PM -0700, Marek Novotny wrote:
New to this group, and new to FreeBSD via PC-BSD. Really like it so far.
Sorry if this has been asked to death already. Levono has their new T450
with the 5th gen intel Broadwell i5 processor. I bought it with the hopes of
running
Thanks!
Marek Novotny
https://github.com/marek-novotny
On 03/22/2015 04:42 PM, Oliver Pinter wrote:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 12:32 AM, Marek Novotny
marek.novo...@marspolar.com wrote:
Hi group,
New to this group, and new to FreeBSD via PC-BSD. Really like it so far.
Sorry if this has been
See https://jenkins.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD-tests2/869/
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
What a coincidence, I'm looking at getting a Broadwell micro PC.
I'm looking at this Broadwell model:
http://www.gigabyte.com.au/products/product-page.aspx?pid=4888#ov
At the moment, I don't mind not having X but I would like it eventually, is
there any idea on when Iris Pro support would be
See https://jenkins.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD-tests2/870/
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Hi Devin,
Recently I'm trying to install FreeBSD CURRENT from bootonly image
( FreeBSD-11.0-CURRENT-amd64-20150302-r279514-bootonly.iso)
on IBM HS22 blade via bladecenter's kvm but I faced with problem on checksum
stage, bootonly doesn't contain base, kernel,etc distributions but it contain
On Mon, 23 Mar 2015 08:47:38 +0300
Sergey V. Dyatko sergey.dya...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Devin,
Recently I'm trying to install FreeBSD CURRENT from bootonly image
( FreeBSD-11.0-CURRENT-amd64-20150302-r279514-bootonly.iso)
on IBM HS22 blade via bladecenter's kvm but I faced with problem on
On 2015-03-23 01:52, Sergey V. Dyatko wrote:
On Mon, 23 Mar 2015 08:47:38 +0300
Sergey V. Dyatko sergey.dya...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Devin,
Recently I'm trying to install FreeBSD CURRENT from bootonly image
( FreeBSD-11.0-CURRENT-amd64-20150302-r279514-bootonly.iso)
on IBM HS22 blade via
33 matches
Mail list logo
