bluetooth not working in recent current

2016-05-24 Thread Graham Menhennitt
I've been running 11-current AMD64 on this machine for about a year. It has a bluetooth dongle that has worked correctly up until a week ago. I updated to the latest source around then, so I presume that's what broke it. I have ng_ubt_load="YES" in /boot/loader.conf, and bluetooth_enable="

Re: ATA? related trouble with r300299

2016-05-24 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 08:04:21 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wrote: > On Monday 23 May 2016 19:08:16 Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 00:59:34 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wrote: > > > On Monday 23 May 2016 17:30:45 you wrote: > > > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 00:15:25 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wro

Re: ATA? related trouble with r300299

2016-05-24 Thread Oleg V. Nauman
On Tuesday 24 May 2016 09:21:17 Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 08:04:21 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wrote: > > On Monday 23 May 2016 19:08:16 Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 00:59:34 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wrote: > > > > On Monday 23 May 2016 17:30:45 you wrote: >

Re: ATA? related trouble with r300299

2016-05-24 Thread Ken Merry
As Oleg mentioned, that was due to the compatibility shims for the old ATA layer getting removed. The only thing required to get those machines to boot would be to change /dev/ad* in /boot/loader.conf to the correct /dev/ada device. Ken — Ken Merry k...@freebsd.org > On May 24, 2016, at 12:

Re: AHCI/ADA regression?

2016-05-24 Thread Gary Jennejohn
On Mon, 23 May 2016 13:51:05 -0400 "Kenneth D. Merry" wrote: > On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 10:09:49 +0200, Gary Jennejohn wrote: > > There appears to be a regression in AHCI/ADA behavior since r300207. > > > > Starting a test kernel at r300293 results in extremely long timeouts > > probing ahcich2 f

Re: ATA? related trouble with r300299

2016-05-24 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 16:38:40 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wrote: > On Tuesday 24 May 2016 09:21:17 Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 08:04:21 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wrote: > > > On Monday 23 May 2016 19:08:16 Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > > > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 00:59:34 +0300, Oleg

Re: AHCI/ADA regression?

2016-05-24 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 15:58:28 +0200, Gary Jennejohn wrote: > On Mon, 23 May 2016 13:51:05 -0400 > "Kenneth D. Merry" wrote: > > > On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 10:09:49 +0200, Gary Jennejohn wrote: > > > There appears to be a regression in AHCI/ADA behavior since r300207. > > > > > > Starting a tes

Re: ATA? related trouble with r300299

2016-05-24 Thread Alex V. Petrov
24.05.16 20:21, Kenneth D. Merry пишет: > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 08:04:21 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wrote: >> On Monday 23 May 2016 19:08:16 Kenneth D. Merry wrote: >>> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 00:59:34 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wrote: On Monday 23 May 2016 17:30:45 you wrote: > On Tue, May 24, 20

Re: ATA? related trouble with r300299

2016-05-24 Thread Oleg V. Nauman
On Tuesday 24 May 2016 10:02:09 you wrote: > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 16:38:40 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wrote: > > On Tuesday 24 May 2016 09:21:17 Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 08:04:21 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wrote: > > > > On Monday 23 May 2016 19:08:16 Kenneth D. Merry wrote: >

Re: ATA? related trouble with r300299

2016-05-24 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 18:21:19 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wrote: > On Tuesday 24 May 2016 10:02:09 you wrote: > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 16:38:40 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wrote: > > > On Tuesday 24 May 2016 09:21:17 Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > > > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 08:04:21 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman w

Re: ATA? related trouble with r300299

2016-05-24 Thread Oleg V. Nauman
On Tuesday 24 May 2016 13:13:29 Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 18:21:19 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wrote: > > On Tuesday 24 May 2016 10:02:09 you wrote: > > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 16:38:40 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wrote: > > > > On Tuesday 24 May 2016 09:21:17 Kenneth D. Merry wrote:

Re: AHCI/ADA regression?

2016-05-24 Thread Gary Jennejohn
On Tue, 24 May 2016 10:41:25 -0400 "Kenneth D. Merry" wrote: > > The question in my mind is - why are "empty" multiplier ports being > > probed with the new code but not with the old code? > > If the HBA says that it supports port multipliers, the kernel should always > look for them. It prob

Re: AHCI/ADA regression?

2016-05-24 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 20:00:51 +0200, Gary Jennejohn wrote: > On Tue, 24 May 2016 10:41:25 -0400 > "Kenneth D. Merry" wrote: > > > > The question in my mind is - why are "empty" multiplier ports being > > > probed with the new code but not with the old code? > > > > If the HBA says that it s

Re: ATA? related trouble with r300299

2016-05-24 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 20:46:33 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wrote: > On Tuesday 24 May 2016 13:13:29 Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 18:21:19 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wrote: > > > On Tuesday 24 May 2016 10:02:09 you wrote: > > > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 16:38:40 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman w

Re: ATA? related trouble with r300299

2016-05-24 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 21:59:53 +0700, Alex V. Petrov wrote: > 24.05.16 20:21, Kenneth D. Merry ??: > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 08:04:21 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wrote: > >> On Monday 23 May 2016 19:08:16 Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > >>> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 00:59:34 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wro

Note on filing bugs found in the CFT

2016-05-24 Thread Matthew Macy
I had previously told testers to file bugs in bugzilla. But the sheer numbers that are already there make it a bit heavyweight. In the future please file issues in the github issue tracker for our repo. Thanks. -M ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mai

Re: ATA? related trouble with r300299

2016-05-24 Thread Oleg V. Nauman
On Tuesday 24 May 2016 16:17:33 you wrote: > Okay, I've got a basic idea of what may be going on. The resets that are > getting sent are triggering another probe, which then triggers a reset, > which triggers a probe...and so on. > > So here is another patch that should work for you: > > https:/

Re: ATA? related trouble with r300299

2016-05-24 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 23:54:09 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wrote: > On Tuesday 24 May 2016 16:17:33 you wrote: > > Okay, I've got a basic idea of what may be going on. The resets that are > > getting sent are triggering another probe, which then triggers a reset, > > which triggers a probe...and so on

Re: ATA? related trouble with r300299

2016-05-24 Thread Steven Hartland
On 24/05/2016 21:56, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 23:54:09 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wrote: On Tuesday 24 May 2016 16:17:33 you wrote: Okay, I've got a basic idea of what may be going on. The resets that are getting sent are triggering another probe, which then triggers a rese

Re: Note on filing bugs found in the CFT

2016-05-24 Thread Matthew Macy
On Tue, 24 May 2016 13:30:12 -0700 Matthew Macy wrote > > I had previously told testers to file bugs in bugzilla. But the sheer > numbers that are already there make it a bit heavyweight. In the future > please file issues in the github issue tracker for our repo. Thanks.

Re: ATA? related trouble with r300299

2016-05-24 Thread Alex V. Petrov
25.05.16 03:18, Kenneth D. Merry пишет: > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 21:59:53 +0700, Alex V. Petrov wrote: >> 24.05.16 20:21, Kenneth D. Merry ??: >>> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 08:04:21 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wrote: On Monday 23 May 2016 19:08:16 Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > On Tue, May 2

Re: ATA? related trouble with r300299

2016-05-24 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 07:35:06 +0700, Alex V. Petrov wrote: > > > 25.05.16 03:18, Kenneth D. Merry ??: > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 21:59:53 +0700, Alex V. Petrov wrote: > >> 24.05.16 20:21, Kenneth D. Merry ??: > >>> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 08:04:21 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wrote: