I've been running 11-current AMD64 on this machine for about a year. It
has a bluetooth dongle that has worked correctly up until a week ago. I
updated to the latest source around then, so I presume that's what broke it.
I have
ng_ubt_load="YES"
in /boot/loader.conf, and
bluetooth_enable="
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 08:04:21 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wrote:
> On Monday 23 May 2016 19:08:16 Kenneth D. Merry wrote:
> > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 00:59:34 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wrote:
> > > On Monday 23 May 2016 17:30:45 you wrote:
> > > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 00:15:25 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wro
On Tuesday 24 May 2016 09:21:17 Kenneth D. Merry wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 08:04:21 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wrote:
> > On Monday 23 May 2016 19:08:16 Kenneth D. Merry wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 00:59:34 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wrote:
> > > > On Monday 23 May 2016 17:30:45 you wrote:
>
As Oleg mentioned, that was due to the compatibility shims for the old ATA
layer getting removed. The only thing required to get those machines to boot
would be to change /dev/ad* in /boot/loader.conf to the correct /dev/ada device.
Ken
—
Ken Merry
k...@freebsd.org
> On May 24, 2016, at 12:
On Mon, 23 May 2016 13:51:05 -0400
"Kenneth D. Merry" wrote:
> On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 10:09:49 +0200, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> > There appears to be a regression in AHCI/ADA behavior since r300207.
> >
> > Starting a test kernel at r300293 results in extremely long timeouts
> > probing ahcich2 f
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 16:38:40 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wrote:
> On Tuesday 24 May 2016 09:21:17 Kenneth D. Merry wrote:
> > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 08:04:21 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wrote:
> > > On Monday 23 May 2016 19:08:16 Kenneth D. Merry wrote:
> > > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 00:59:34 +0300, Oleg
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 15:58:28 +0200, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> On Mon, 23 May 2016 13:51:05 -0400
> "Kenneth D. Merry" wrote:
>
> > On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 10:09:49 +0200, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> > > There appears to be a regression in AHCI/ADA behavior since r300207.
> > >
> > > Starting a tes
24.05.16 20:21, Kenneth D. Merry пишет:
> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 08:04:21 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wrote:
>> On Monday 23 May 2016 19:08:16 Kenneth D. Merry wrote:
>>> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 00:59:34 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wrote:
On Monday 23 May 2016 17:30:45 you wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 20
On Tuesday 24 May 2016 10:02:09 you wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 16:38:40 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wrote:
> > On Tuesday 24 May 2016 09:21:17 Kenneth D. Merry wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 08:04:21 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wrote:
> > > > On Monday 23 May 2016 19:08:16 Kenneth D. Merry wrote:
>
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 18:21:19 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wrote:
> On Tuesday 24 May 2016 10:02:09 you wrote:
> > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 16:38:40 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 24 May 2016 09:21:17 Kenneth D. Merry wrote:
> > > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 08:04:21 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman w
On Tuesday 24 May 2016 13:13:29 Kenneth D. Merry wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 18:21:19 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wrote:
> > On Tuesday 24 May 2016 10:02:09 you wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 16:38:40 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday 24 May 2016 09:21:17 Kenneth D. Merry wrote:
On Tue, 24 May 2016 10:41:25 -0400
"Kenneth D. Merry" wrote:
> > The question in my mind is - why are "empty" multiplier ports being
> > probed with the new code but not with the old code?
>
> If the HBA says that it supports port multipliers, the kernel should always
> look for them. It prob
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 20:00:51 +0200, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> On Tue, 24 May 2016 10:41:25 -0400
> "Kenneth D. Merry" wrote:
>
> > > The question in my mind is - why are "empty" multiplier ports being
> > > probed with the new code but not with the old code?
> >
> > If the HBA says that it s
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 20:46:33 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wrote:
> On Tuesday 24 May 2016 13:13:29 Kenneth D. Merry wrote:
> > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 18:21:19 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 24 May 2016 10:02:09 you wrote:
> > > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 16:38:40 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman w
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 21:59:53 +0700, Alex V. Petrov wrote:
> 24.05.16 20:21, Kenneth D. Merry ??:
> > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 08:04:21 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wrote:
> >> On Monday 23 May 2016 19:08:16 Kenneth D. Merry wrote:
> >>> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 00:59:34 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wro
I had previously told testers to file bugs in bugzilla. But the sheer numbers
that are already there make it a bit heavyweight. In the future please file
issues in the github issue tracker for our repo. Thanks.
-M
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mai
On Tuesday 24 May 2016 16:17:33 you wrote:
> Okay, I've got a basic idea of what may be going on. The resets that are
> getting sent are triggering another probe, which then triggers a reset,
> which triggers a probe...and so on.
>
> So here is another patch that should work for you:
>
> https:/
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 23:54:09 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wrote:
> On Tuesday 24 May 2016 16:17:33 you wrote:
> > Okay, I've got a basic idea of what may be going on. The resets that are
> > getting sent are triggering another probe, which then triggers a reset,
> > which triggers a probe...and so on
On 24/05/2016 21:56, Kenneth D. Merry wrote:
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 23:54:09 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wrote:
On Tuesday 24 May 2016 16:17:33 you wrote:
Okay, I've got a basic idea of what may be going on. The resets that are
getting sent are triggering another probe, which then triggers a rese
On Tue, 24 May 2016 13:30:12 -0700 Matthew Macy wrote
>
> I had previously told testers to file bugs in bugzilla. But the sheer
> numbers that are already there make it a bit heavyweight. In the future
> please file issues in the github issue tracker for our repo. Thanks.
25.05.16 03:18, Kenneth D. Merry пишет:
> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 21:59:53 +0700, Alex V. Petrov wrote:
>> 24.05.16 20:21, Kenneth D. Merry ??:
>>> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 08:04:21 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wrote:
On Monday 23 May 2016 19:08:16 Kenneth D. Merry wrote:
> On Tue, May 2
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 07:35:06 +0700, Alex V. Petrov wrote:
>
>
> 25.05.16 03:18, Kenneth D. Merry ??:
> > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 21:59:53 +0700, Alex V. Petrov wrote:
> >> 24.05.16 20:21, Kenneth D. Merry ??:
> >>> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 08:04:21 +0300, Oleg V. Nauman wrote:
22 matches
Mail list logo