HEADS-UP: Merged llvm/clang 5.0.0 into -CURRENT (as of r321369)

Hi, I have merged clang, llvm, lld, lldb, compiler-rt and libc++ 5.0.0 (trunk r308421) into head. Universe builds went just fine, but if you encounter any snags during world and/or kernel builds, please file PRs. Since upstream has just created their 5.0.0 release branch, this is a good month to

Re: HEADS-UP: Merged llvm/clang 5.0.0 into -CURRENT (as of r321369)

On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 02:36:03PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote: > Hi, > > I have merged clang, llvm, lld, lldb, compiler-rt and libc++ 5.0.0 > (trunk r308421) into head. Universe builds went just fine, but if you > encounter any snags during world and/or kernel builds, please file PRs. > > Since

Re: HEADS-UP: Merged llvm/clang 5.0.0 into -CURRENT (as of r321369)

On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 11:33:08AM -0400, Shawn Webb wrote: > On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 02:36:03PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have merged clang, llvm, lld, lldb, compiler-rt and libc++ 5.0.0 > > (trunk r308421) into head. Universe builds went just fine, but if you > > encounter

Re: HEADS-UP: Merged llvm/clang 5.0.0 into -CURRENT (as of r321369)

On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 01:32:17PM -0400, Shawn Webb wrote: > On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 11:33:08AM -0400, Shawn Webb wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 02:36:03PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I have merged clang, llvm, lld, lldb, compiler-rt and libc++ 5.0.0 > > > (trunk r30842

Re: HEADS-UP: Merged llvm/clang 5.0.0 into -CURRENT (as of r321369)

On 22 Jul 2017, at 19:38, Shawn Webb wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 01:32:17PM -0400, Shawn Webb wrote: >> On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 11:33:08AM -0400, Shawn Webb wrote: >>> On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 02:36:03PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote: Hi, I have merged clang, llvm, lld, lldb,

amd64 -r321109 -> -r321371 buildworld update failed (spans clang 5 update); error: too few arguments provided to function-like macro invocation; , METAMODE and -j8 was used

My first attempt to update amd64 to a clang 5 based /usr/src failed ( -r321109 -> -r321371 ). Listing just the first error initially: --- ToolDrivers/llvm-lib/LibDriver.o --- In file included from /usr/src/contrib/llvm/lib/ToolDrivers/llvm-lib/LibDriver.cpp:35: /usr/obj/amd64_clang/amd64.amd64/us

Re: amd64 -r321109 -> -r321371 buildworld update failed (spans clang 5 update); error: too few arguments provided to function-like macro invocation; , METAMODE and -j8 was used

On 07/22/17 19:32, Mark Millard wrote: My first attempt to update amd64 to a clang 5 based /usr/src failed ( -r321109 -> -r321371 ). Listing just the first error initially: --- ToolDrivers/llvm-lib/LibDriver.o --- In file included from /usr/src/contrib/llvm/lib/ToolDrivers/llvm-lib/LibDriver.cp

Re: amd64 -r321109 -> -r321371 buildworld update failed (spans clang 5 update); error: too few arguments provided to function-like macro invocation; , METAMODE and -j8 was used

[I've added a "more" of /root/src.configs/make.conf that I had omitted but it only adds a "CFLAGS.gcc+= -v" to the build context. That should not matter here.] On 2017-Jul-22, at 4:32 PM, Mark Millard wrote: > My first attempt to update amd64 to a clang 5 based /usr/src > failed ( -r321109 -> -r

Re: amd64 -r321109 -> -r321371 buildworld update failed (spans clang 5 update); error: too few arguments provided to function-like macro invocation; , METAMODE and -j8 was used

On 23 Jul 2017, at 01:32, Mark Millard wrote: > > My first attempt to update amd64 to a clang 5 based /usr/src > failed ( -r321109 -> -r321371 ). Listing just the first > error initially: > > --- ToolDrivers/llvm-lib/LibDriver.o --- > In file included from > /usr/src/contrib/llvm/lib/ToolDriver

Re: amd64 -r321109 -> -r321371 buildworld update failed (spans clang 5 update); error: too few arguments provided to function-like macro invocation; , METAMODE and -j8 was used

On 2017-Jul-22, at 4:50 PM, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 23 Jul 2017, at 01:32, Mark Millard wrote: >> >> My first attempt to update amd64 to a clang 5 based /usr/src >> failed ( -r321109 -> -r321371 ). Listing just the first >> error initially: >> >> --- ToolDrivers/llvm-lib/LibDriver.o --- >>

Re: amd64 -r321109 -> -r321371 buildworld update failed (spans clang 5 update); error: too few arguments provided to function-like macro invocation; , METAMODE and -j8 was used

On 23 Jul 2017, at 02:02, Mark Millard wrote: > > On 2017-Jul-22, at 4:50 PM, Dimitry Andric wrote: >> On 23 Jul 2017, at 01:32, Mark Millard wrote: >>> >>> My first attempt to update amd64 to a clang 5 based /usr/src >>> failed ( -r321109 -> -r321371 ). Listing just the first >>> error initia

-r321371: -j8 failed for "installworld distrib-dirs distribute DESTDIR=/usr/obj/DESTDIRs/clang-amd64-installworld-dist"

After buildworld buildkernel installkernel installkernel reboot to upgrade to -r321371 (from -r321109 ) I attempted: ~/sys_build_scripts.amd64-host/make_amd64_nodebug_clang-amd64-host.sh installworld distrib-dirs distribute DESTDIR=/usr/obj/DESTDIRs/clang-amd64-installworld-dist (where clang-am

Re: -r321371: -j8 failed for "installworld distrib-dirs distribute DESTDIR=/usr/obj/DESTDIRs/clang-amd64-installworld-dist"

On 2017-Jul-22, at 9:04 PM, Mark Millard wrote: > After buildworld buildkernel installkernel installkernel reboot to > upgrade to -r321371 (from -r321109 ) I attempted: > > ~/sys_build_scripts.amd64-host/make_amd64_nodebug_clang-amd64-host.sh > installworld distrib-dirs distribute > DESTDIR=/

-r321371: "installworld distrib-dirs distribute DESTDIR=/usr/obj/DESTDIRs/clang-amd64-installworld-dist" failed: target directory `/base/usr/lib/' does not exist

[Note: This is actually after the -j8 report that I sent but the failure may well be related despite happening much later.] After buildworld buildkernel installkernel installkernel reboot to upgrade to -r321371 (from -r321109 ) I attempted: ~/sys_build_scripts.amd64-host/make_amd64_nodebug_clang-