2010/2/18 Marcin Cieslak :
> My r203753 amd64 laptop falls into the deadlock situation
> every night while running periodic daily script. I am pretty
> certain this is related to ZFS.
>
> I have enabled DEADLKRES in the kernel. I even have
> a separate dump partition (not used for swap).
May you r
2010/2/17 Pyun YongHyeon :
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 01:12:53PM -0800, Xin LI wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 10:20 AM, Gavin Atkinson
>> wrote:
>> >> /mnt: write failed, filesystem is full
>> >> gzip: write: No space left on device
>> >> gzip: output file: randomfile.gz wrong size (16
2010/2/25 Pyun YongHyeon :
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 04:48:28PM +0100, Attilio Rao wrote:
>> 2010/2/17 Pyun YongHyeon :
>> > On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 01:12:53PM -0800, Xin LI wrote:
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 10:20 AM, Ga
2010/2/28 Andrew Brampton :
> Hello,
>
> When many interrupts are firing on my amd64 SMP machine, and a panic
> occurs, dump will fail with the error "Attempt to write outside dump
> device boundaries". This problem has been discussed before[1][2], and
> I even filled a PR about it last year[3].
>
2010/4/4 Phil Regnauld :
> Hi everyone,
>
> Wasn't sure where to post this, so I'll try here as it involves -CURRENT
> as well, and effort is probably best spent there.
>
> Have acquired a MacMini "Server" model (4 GB RAM, 2 x 500 GB disk, and
> no optical drive) to build a workshop training server
2010/2/22 Marcin Cieslak :
>
>
>
> On Sat, 20 Feb 2010, Attilio Rao wrote:
>
>> 2010/2/18 Marcin Cieslak :
>>>
>>> My r203753 amd64 laptop falls into the deadlock situation
>>> every night while running periodic daily script. I am pretty
>>&g
2010/3/13 Garrett Cooper :
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 9:58 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 2:07 PM, Tom Couch
>> wrote:
>>> Hi FreeBSD-current,
>>> My name is Tom Couch,
>>> I am part of the 3ware driver team recently acquired by LSI.
>>> I believe Giovanni's patch, below
2010/4/13 Attilio Rao :
> 2010/3/13 Garrett Cooper :
>> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 9:58 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 2:07 PM, Tom Couch
>>> wrote:
>>>> Hi FreeBSD-current,
>>>> My name is Tom Couch,
>>>&
2010/4/19 Erik Cederstrand :
> Hi
>
> I'm testing ClangBSD in a VirtualBox client and ran into a panic on the
> client, but I don't think it's clang-related. I haven't tried kernel
> debugging before. I tried getting a backtrace as described in
> http://old.nabble.com/Re%3A-ia64--%3E-panic%3A-de
2010/4/20 Erik Cederstrand :
>
> Den 19/04/2010 kl. 17.03 skrev Attilio Rao:
>
>> 2010/4/19 Erik Cederstrand :
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> I'm testing ClangBSD in a VirtualBox client and ran into a panic on the
>>> client, but I don't think it
2010/4/20 David Ehrmann :
> Initially, I noticed a problem where reading a file on this machine seemed
> to stop--something like a video would just stop playing. At first, I
> thought it was the machine, but a new motherboard, CPU, and RAM later, the
> problem persists. The network card uses a di
2010/9/27 Sean Bruno :
> Does this look like an appropriate modification to libmemstat?
>
> Sean
>
>
> //depot/yahoo/ybsd_7/src/lib/libmemstat/memstat.h#4
> - /home/seanbru/ybsd_7/src/lib/libmemstat/memstat.h
> @@ -28,12 +28,13 @@
>
> #ifndef _MEMSTAT_H_
> #define _MEMSTAT_H_
> +
2010/9/27 Sean Bruno :
> On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 08:53 -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
>> On 9/27/10 8:26 AM, Sean Bruno wrote:
>> > Does this look like an appropriate modification to libmemstat?
>> >
>> > Sean
>> >
>> >
>> > //depot/yahoo/ybsd_7/src/lib/libmemstat/memstat.h#4
>> > - /home/seanbru
In the last weeks I worked for porting the netdump infrastructure to
FreeBSD-CURRENT on the behalf of Sandvine Incorporated.
Netdump is a framework that aims for handling kernel coredumps over
the TCP/IP suite in order to dump to a separate machine than the
running one. That may be used on an inter
2010/9/29 Sergey Kandaurov :
> [just don't know what namely need to test, so]
>
> All made according to your instructions.
> The only way I could trigger netdump was
> to run its ddb command by hand. Neither
> debug.kdb.enter nor debug.kdb.panic don't do it.
You probabilly need to use KDB_UNATTEND
2010/9/30 Andre Oppermann :
> On 30.09.2010 19:24, Roman Divacky wrote:
>>
>> are you aware of Summer of Code 2008 project by Mayur Shardul?
>
> I remember that there was this project but I never saw any numbers
> or other outcome of it. Haven't checked p4 to look at the code
> though.
The final
2010/9/28 Attilio Rao :
> In the last weeks I worked for porting the netdump infrastructure to
> FreeBSD-CURRENT on the behalf of Sandvine Incorporated.
> Netdump is a framework that aims for handling kernel coredumps over
> the TCP/IP suite in order to dump to a separate mach
2010/10/9 Robert Watson :
> On Fri, 8 Oct 2010, Attilio Rao wrote:
>
>>> GENERAL FRAMEWORK ARCHITECTURE
>>>
>>> Netdump is composed, right now, by an userland "server" and a kernel
>>> "client". The former is run on the target
2010/10/14 Robert N. M. Watson :
>
> On 13 Oct 2010, at 18:46, Ryan Stone wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 9:15 PM, Robert Watson wrote:
>>> + /*
>>> + * get and fill a header mbuf, then chain data as an
>>> extended
>>> + * mbuf.
>>> +
2010/10/14 Robert N. M. Watson :
>
> On 14 Oct 2010, at 15:10, Attilio Rao wrote:
>
>>> My concern is less about occasional lost dumps that destabilising the
>>> dumping process: calls into the memory allocator can currently trigger a
>>> lot of interesting be
2010/11/29 Alexander Motin :
> On 29.11.2010 17:07, John Baldwin wrote:
>>
>> On Friday, November 26, 2010 4:38:49 pm David Rhodus wrote:
>>>
>>> I hit this panic on my NFS server.
>>>
>>> -DR
>>>
>>> coke.fun dumped core - see /var/crash/vmcore.2
>>>
>>> Fri Nov 26 14:50:48 UTC 2010
>>>
>>> FreeBS
2010/12/7 Erik Cederstrand :
>
> Den 07/12/2010 kl. 10.20 skrev Garrett Cooper:
>
>> On Dec 7, 2010, at 12:26 AM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
>> wrote:
>>
>>> A Dmesg.TXT is attached having a lock order reversal .
>>
>> The mount LOR is well known.
>
> I see that this is the standard response to lot
2010/5/6 Weongyo Jeong :
> On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 10:42:16PM +0200, Gustau P?rez wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>>
>> >> I've been testing the driver for a few time with AMD64/CURRENT. A
>> >> few time ago I started to see messages like :
>> >>
>> >> bwn0: unsupporte
2010/5/8 Ulrich Spörlein :
> On Sat, 08.05.2010 at 18:00:50 +0200, Attilio Rao wrote:
>> 2010/5/8 Ulrich Spörlein :
>> > On Sat, 08.05.2010 at 12:20:05 +0200, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
>> >> This LOR also is not yet listed on the LOR page, so I guess it&#x
2010/5/9 Jeff Roberson :
> On Sat, 8 May 2010, Ulrich Sp?rlein wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 08.05.2010 at 18:00:50 +0200, Attilio Rao wrote:
>>>
>>> 2010/5/8 Ulrich Sp?rlein :
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, 08.05.2010 at 12:20:05 +0200, Ulrich Sp?rlein wrote:
>&
2010/5/10 Peter Jeremy :
> On 2010-May-08 12:20:05 +0200, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
>>This LOR also is not yet listed on the LOR page, so I guess it's rather
>>new. I do use SUJ.
>>
>>lock order reversal:
>> 1st 0xc48388d8 ufs (ufs) @ /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_lookup.c:502
>> 2nd 0xec0fe304 bufwait (bufw
2010/5/12 Jeff Roberson :
> On Wed, 12 May 2010, Ulrich Sp?rlein wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 10.05.2010 at 22:53:32 +0200, Attilio Rao wrote:
>>>
>>> 2010/5/10 Peter Jeremy :
>>>>
>>>> On 2010-May-08 12:20:05 +0200, Ulrich Sp?rlein
>>>>
2010/5/31 Kostik Belousov :
> On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 12:03:17AM -0600, Scott Long wrote:
>> On May 30, 2010, at 7:58 AM, Kostik Belousov wrote:
>> > On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 03:02:40PM +0200, Roman Divacky wrote:
>> >> hi,
>> >>
>> >> ClangBSD was updated to LLVM/clang revision 104832 which is what
2010/5/31 Roman Divacky :
> On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 12:54:29PM +0200, Attilio Rao wrote:
>> 2010/5/31 Kostik Belousov :
>> > On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 12:03:17AM -0600, Scott Long wrote:
>> >> On May 30, 2010, at 7:58 AM, Kostik Belousov wrote:
>> >> > On
2010/6/28 John Baldwin :
> On Friday 25 June 2010 4:52:22 pm pluknet wrote:
>> On 25 June 2010 13:50, Anton Yuzhaninov wrote:
>> > I've got panic on 9-current from Jun 25 2010
>> >
>> > May be this is bug in deadlock resolver
>> >
>> > panic: blockable sleep lock (sleep mutex) process lock @
>> >
Is this core updates somewhere? (With, possibly, a copy of your kernel
binaries?)
Attilio
2010/7/3 Mateusz Guzik :
> Hi,
>
> I've got the following panic while running kernel as of r209343:
>
> Kernel page fault with the following non-sleepable locks held:
> exclusive sleep mutex Softdep Lock (So
2010/7/4 Peter Holm :
> On Sun, Jul 04, 2010 at 09:42:08PM +0200, Attilio Rao wrote:
>> Is this core updates somewhere? (With, possibly, a copy of your kernel
>> binaries?)
>>
>> Attilio
>>
>
> Some more info here:
>
> http://people.freebsd.org/~pho/st
2010/7/4 Attilio Rao :
> 2010/7/4 Peter Holm :
>> On Sun, Jul 04, 2010 at 09:42:08PM +0200, Attilio Rao wrote:
>>> Is this core updates somewhere? (With, possibly, a copy of your kernel
>>> binaries?)
>>>
>>> Attilio
>>>
>>
>> So
2010/7/1 Bryan Venteicher :
> On a recent -current, I got the following panic from deadlkres:
>
> Assertion wchan != NULL failed at /usr/src-nfs/sys/kern/subr_sleepqueue.c:680
>
> Tracing pid 0 tid 100058 td 0xff00024bf7a0
> kdb_enter() at kdb_enter+0x3d
> panic() at panic+0x176
> sleepq_type()
2010/7/12 Doug Barton :
> Howdy,
>
> I use -current on my laptop as my regular X platform, and for the last
> few months I've been noticing that interactivity problems have been
> getting a lot worse, by which I mean that if I have something running in
> the background that is either disk or cpu in
2011/9/27 John Baldwin :
> On Monday, September 26, 2011 11:36:26 pm Adrian Chadd wrote:
>> .. and as a follow up (and cc'ing attillo and freebsd-mips, in case
>> it's relevant to other platforms and there's a MIPS specific thing to
>> fix):
>>
>> * 2128: mi_switch to idle
>> * 2129: kern_clocksour
2011/9/27 crsnet.pl :
>> Hi,
>
> Hello, thanks for reply.
>>
>> Please try to do this without wlan loaded at all (not just down, but
>> build your wifi support as a module.)
>> Then try without X, see whether it's related to that or not.
>>
> First i make kldunload if_iwn.
> When i try to suspend f
Can you please show the panic message?
Attilio
2011/10/1 Harald Schmalzbauer :
> Hello,
>
> I got the following panic with 9.0-beta2:
>
> cpuid = 0
> KDB: enter: panic
> [ thread pid 1445 tid 100126 ]
> Stopped at kbd_enter+0x2b: movq $0,0x918a52(%rip)
> db> bt
> Tracing pid 1445 tid 1001
2011/10/28 :
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 8:37 AM, Ryan Stone wrote:
>> I'm seeing issues on a unicore systems running a derivative of FreeBSD
>> 8.2-RELEASE if something calls mem_range_attr_set. It turns out that
>> the root cause is a bug in smp_rendezvous_cpus. The first part of
>> smp_rendezv
2011/11/7 Arnaud Lacombe :
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Kostik Belousov wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 06:03:39PM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote:
>>
>> Below is the KBI patch after vm_page_bits_t merge is done.
>> Again, I did not spent time converting all in-tree consumers
>> from
2011/11/7 Attilio Rao :
> 2011/11/7 Arnaud Lacombe :
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Kostik Belousov wrote:
>>> On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 06:03:39PM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote:
>>>
>>> Below is the KBI patch after vm_page_bits_
2011/11/8 Attilio Rao :
> Author: attilio
> Date: Tue Nov 8 10:18:07 2011
> New Revision: 227333
> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/227333
>
> Log:
> Introduce the option VFS_ALLOW_NONMPSAFE and turn it on by default on
> all the architectures.
> The option
2011/11/8 Arnaud Lacombe :
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 4:36 AM, Attilio Rao wrote:
>>> 2011/11/7 Arnaud Lacombe :
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Kosti
2011/11/10 Stefan Esser :
> For a few weeks I have been suffering from a problem that requires manual
> intervention to get my home workstation boot -CURRENT.
>
> The kernel panics at varying places and with different panic messages, e.g.
> (hand transcribed since kernel dumps don't work at that st
Can you try rebuilding your kernel and modules from scratch and see if
it fixes your problem?
Attilio
2011/11/11 Stefan Esser :
> Am 10.11.2011 11:32, schrieb Attilio Rao:
>>
>> 2011/11/10 Stefan Esser:
>>>
>>> I can produce further debug output on demand,
2011/11/13 Davide Italiano :
> On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 9:52 PM, Davide Italiano
> wrote:
>> Good evening folks.
>> During last days I've written a patch to add sandy bridge support to
>> hwpmc. Until now, the most recent Intel processor microarchitecture
>> supported was Westmere.
>> Testing is ap
2011/11/13 Davide Italiano :
> On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 9:56 PM, Attilio Rao wrote:
>> 2011/11/13 Davide Italiano :
>>> On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 9:52 PM, Davide Italiano
>>> wrote:
>>>> Good evening folks.
>>>> During last days I've written
2011/11/13 Davide Italiano :
> On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 9:52 PM, Davide Italiano
> wrote:
>> Good evening folks.
>> During last days I've written a patch to add sandy bridge support to
>> hwpmc. Until now, the most recent Intel processor microarchitecture
>> supported was Westmere.
>> Testing is ap
2011/11/7 Kostik Belousov :
> On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 11:45:38AM -0600, Alan Cox wrote:
>> Ok. I'll offer one final suggestion. Please consider an alternative
>> suffix to "func". Perhaps, "kbi" or "KBI". In other words, something
>> that hints at the function's reason for existing.
>
> Sure. B
2011/11/15 :
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Attilio Rao wrote:
>> 2011/11/7 Kostik Belousov :
>>> On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 11:45:38AM -0600, Alan Cox wrote:
>>>> Ok. I'll offer one final suggestion. Please consider an alternative
>>>> suffix
2011/11/17 Andriy Gapon :
> on 17/11/2011 21:09 John Baldwin said the following:
>> On Thursday, November 17, 2011 11:58:03 am Andriy Gapon wrote:
>>> on 17/11/2011 18:37 John Baldwin said the following:
On Thursday, November 17, 2011 4:47:42 am Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 17/11/2011 10:34 An
2011/11/17 :
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Attilio Rao wrote:
>> 2011/11/17 Andriy Gapon :
>>> BTW, it is my opinion that we really should not let the debugger code call
>>> mi_switch for any reason.
>>
>> Yes, I agree with this, this is why
2011/11/16 Kostik Belousov :
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 07:15:01PM +0100, Attilio Rao wrote:
>> 2011/11/7 Kostik Belousov :
>> > On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 11:45:38AM -0600, Alan Cox wrote:
>> >> Ok. I'll offer one final suggestion. Please consider an alternati
2011/11/18 Kostik Belousov :
> On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 11:40:28AM +0100, Attilio Rao wrote:
>> 2011/11/16 Kostik Belousov :
>> > On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 07:15:01PM +0100, Attilio Rao wrote:
>> >> 2011/11/7 Kostik Belousov :
>> >> > On Mon, Nov
2011/11/18 Attilio Rao :
> 2011/11/18 Kostik Belousov :
>> On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 11:40:28AM +0100, Attilio Rao wrote:
>>> 2011/11/16 Kostik Belousov :
>>> > On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 07:15:01PM +0100, Attilio Rao wrote:
>>> >> 2011/11/7 Kostik Belousov
2011/11/18 Attilio Rao :
> 2011/11/18 Attilio Rao :
>> 2011/11/18 Kostik Belousov :
>>> On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 11:40:28AM +0100, Attilio Rao wrote:
>>>> 2011/11/16 Kostik Belousov :
>>>> > On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 07:15:01PM +0100, Attilio
2011/11/20 Kostik Belousov :
> On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 05:37:33PM +0100, Attilio Rao wrote:
>> 2011/11/18 Attilio Rao :
>> > Please consider:
>> > http://www.freebsd.org/~attilio/mutexfileline2.patch
>>
>> This is now committed as r227758,227759, you
It looks good to me.
Attilio
2011/11/20 Kostik Belousov :
> On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 07:02:14PM +0100, Attilio Rao wrote:
>> 2011/11/20 Kostik Belousov :
>> > +#define vm_page_lock_assert(m, a) \
>> > + vm_page_lock_assert_KBI((m), (a), LOCK_FILE, L
2011/11/20 Attilio Rao :
> 2011/11/18 Attilio Rao :
>> 2011/11/18 Attilio Rao :
>>> 2011/11/18 Kostik Belousov :
>>>> On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 11:40:28AM +0100, Attilio Rao wrote:
>>>>> 2011/11/16 Kostik Belousov :
>>>>> > On Tue, Nov
2011/11/20 Kostik Belousov :
> On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 08:04:21PM +0100, Attilio Rao wrote:
>> This other patch converts sx to a similar interface which cleans up vm_map.c:
>> http://www.freebsd.org/~attilio/sxfileline.patch
>>
>> What do you think about it?
>
&
2011/11/20 Kostik Belousov :
> On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 08:22:38PM +0100, Attilio Rao wrote:
>> 2011/11/20 Kostik Belousov :
>> > On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 08:04:21PM +0100, Attilio Rao wrote:
>> >> This other patch converts sx to a similar interface which cleans
2011/11/21 John Baldwin :
> On Friday, November 18, 2011 4:59:32 pm Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> on 17/11/2011 23:38 John Baldwin said the following:
>> > On Thursday, November 17, 2011 4:35:07 pm John Baldwin wrote:
>> >> Hmmm, you could also make critical_exit() not perform deferred preemptions
>> >> i
2011/12/2 John Baldwin :
> On 12/2/11 5:05 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>>
>> on 02/12/2011 06:36 John Baldwin said the following:
>>>
>>> Ah, ok (I had thought SCHEDULER_STOPPED was going to always be true when
>>> kdb was
>>> active). But I think these two changes should cover critical_exit() ok.
>>>
2011/12/2 John Baldwin :
> On 12/2/11 12:18 PM, Attilio Rao wrote:
>>
>> 2011/12/2 John Baldwin:
>>>
>>> On 12/2/11 5:05 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> on 02/12/2011 06:36 John Baldwin said the following:
>>>>
2011/12/2 Andriy Gapon :
> on 02/12/2011 20:40 John Baldwin said the following:
>> On 12/2/11 12:18 PM, Attilio Rao wrote:
>>> 2011/12/2 John Baldwin:
>>>> On 12/2/11 5:05 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> on 02/12/2011 06:36 John Bal
2011/12/4 Andriy Gapon :
> on 21/11/2011 18:58 Attilio Rao said the following:
>> I would be very in favor about having a 'thread trampoline for KDB',
>> thus that it can use locks.
>
> I keep hearing the suggestion to add this trampoline, but I admit that I do
&
2011/12/4 Andriy Gapon :
> on 02/12/2011 19:18 Attilio Rao said the following:
>> BTW, I'm waiting for the details to settle (including the patch we
>> have been discussing internally about binding to CPU0 during ACPI
>> shutdown)
>
> I do not see strong interdepen
2011/11/13 Kostik Belousov :
> I was tricked into finishing the work by Andrey Gapon, who developed
> the patch to reliably stop other processors on panic. The patch
> greatly improves the chances of getting dump on panic on SMP host.
> Several people already saw the patchset, and I remember that
2011/12/6 Andriy Gapon :
> on 06/12/2011 20:34 Attilio Rao said the following:
> [snip]
>> - I'm not entirely sure, why we want to disable interrupts at this
>> moment (before to stop other CPUs)?:
>
> Because I believe that stop_cpus_hard() should run in a con
2011/12/7 Andriy Gapon :
> on 07/12/2011 00:11 Attilio Rao said the following:
>> I'd just change this check on panicstr:
>> @@ -606,9 +603,13 @@ kdb_trap(int type, int code, struct trapframe *tf)
>> intr = intr_disable();
>>
>> #ifdef SMP
>> -
2011/12/14 Mike Tancsa :
> On 12/13/2011 7:01 PM, m...@freebsd.org wrote:
>>
>> Has anyone experiencing problems tried to set sysctl
>> kern.sched.steal_thresh=1 ?
>>
>> I don't remember what our specific problem at $WORK was, perhaps it
>> was just interrupt threads not getting serviced fast enou
2011/12/13 Jeremy Chadwick :
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 02:47:57PM +0100, O. Hartmann wrote:
>> > Not fully right, boinc defaults to run on idprio 31 so this isn't an
>> > issue. And yes, there are cases where SCHED_ULE shows much better
>> > performance then SCHED_4BSD. [...]
>>
>> Do we have any
2011/12/15 Mike Tancsa :
> On 12/15/2011 11:26 AM, Attilio Rao wrote:
>>
>> Hi Mike,
>> was that just the same codebase with the switch SCHED_4BSD/SCHED_ULE?
>
> Hi Attilio,
> It was the same codebase.
>
>
>> Could you retry the bench checking
2011/12/15 Mike Tancsa :
> On 12/15/2011 11:42 AM, Attilio Rao wrote:
>>
>> I'm thinking now to a better test-case for this: can you try that on a
>> tmpfs volume?
>
> There is enough RAM in the box so that it should not touch the disk, and
> I was sending the
2011/12/15 Jeremy Chadwick :
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 05:26:27PM +0100, Attilio Rao wrote:
>> 2011/12/13 Jeremy Chadwick :
>> > On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 02:47:57PM +0100, O. Hartmann wrote:
>> >> > Not fully right, boinc defaults to run on idprio 31 so this isn&#
2011/12/15 Mike Tancsa :
> On 12/15/2011 11:56 AM, Attilio Rao wrote:
>> So, as very first thing, can you try the following:
>> - Same codebase, etc. etc.
>> - Make the test 4 times, discard the first and ministat for the other 3
>> - Reboot
>> - Change the steal_
2011/12/16 Arnaud Lacombe :
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 2:32 AM, O. Hartmann
> wrote:
>> Just saw this shot benchmark on Phoronix dot com today:
>>
>> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTAyNzA
>>
> it might be worth highlighting that despite Oracle Linux 6.1 Server is
> usin
2011/12/20 John Baldwin :
> On Saturday, December 17, 2011 10:41:15 pm m...@freebsd.org wrote:
>> On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 5:45 PM, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
>> > On Sun, 18 Dec 2011 01:09:00 +0100
>> > "O. Hartmann" wrote:
>> >
>> >> Sleeping thread (tid 100033, pid 16) owns a non sleepable lock
>>
2011/12/20 John Baldwin :
> On Tuesday, December 20, 2011 9:20:09 am Attilio Rao wrote:
>> 2011/12/20 John Baldwin :
>> > On Saturday, December 17, 2011 10:41:15 pm m...@freebsd.org wrote:
>> >> On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 5:45 PM, Alexander Kabaev
>> >> w
2012/1/19 John Baldwin :
> On Thursday, January 19, 2012 11:02:57 am Glen Barber wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 10:50:45AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
>> > On Wednesday, January 18, 2012 5:01:37 pm Glen Barber wrote:
>> > > Hi,
>> > >
>> > > I'm running -CURRENT from about 5 days ago:
>> > >
>> >
2011/11/8 Attilio Rao :
> 2011/11/8 Attilio Rao :
>> Author: attilio
>> Date: Tue Nov 8 10:18:07 2011
>> New Revision: 227333
>> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/227333
>>
>> Log:
>> Introduce the option VFS_ALLOW_NONMPSAFE and turn
On 8/23/12, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> Hi,
> I am a bit unclear on what are the pros and cons of using
> TUNABLE_INT vs TUNABLE_INT_FETCH within a device driver.
TUNABLE_INT is basically the "statically initializer" version of
TUNABLE_INT_FETCH.
In short terms, you will use TUNABLE_INT_FETCH() in norma
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 5:05 PM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 03:52:56PM +0100, Attilio Rao wrote:
>> On 8/23/12, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> > I am a bit unclear on what are the pros and cons of using
>> > TUNABLE_INT vs TUNA
On 9/11/12, Brooks Davis wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 01:45:18PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 04:12:07PM -0500, Brooks Davis wrote:
>> > For the past several years we've been working towards migrating from
>> > GCC to Clang/LLVM as our default compiler. We inte
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 4:56 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Sep 11, 2012, at 8:35 AM, Daniel Eischen wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 11 Sep 2012, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 02:06:49PM +0200, Roman Divacky wrote:
We currently dont compile 4680 ports (out of 23857). Top
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 12:18 AM, Attilio Rao wrote:
> 2012/7/4 Attilio Rao :
>> 2012/6/29 Attilio Rao :
>>> As already published several times, according to the following plan:
>>> http://wiki.freebsd.org/NONMPSAFE_DEORBIT_VFS
>>>
>>
>> I still hav
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 4:47 AM, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 7:48 PM, Attilio Rao wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 12:18 AM, Attilio Rao wrote:
>>> 2012/7/4 Attilio Rao :
>>>> 2012/6/29 Attilio Rao :
>>>>> As already published s
On 9/19/12, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 12:30 AM, Attilio Rao wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 4:47 AM, Kevin Oberman wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 7:48 PM, Attilio Rao
>>> wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 12:18 AM, Attilio
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 1:22 AM, Attilio Rao wrote:
[ trimm ]
>
> You can use the branch directly or this patch against -CURRENT at 240752:
> http://www.freebsd.org/~attilio/fuse_import/fuse_240752.patch
>
> In order to test this work, then, you just need to patch (or use
> d
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 3:48 AM, Attilio Rao wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 12:18 AM, Attilio Rao wrote:
>> 2012/7/4 Attilio Rao :
>>> 2012/6/29 Attilio Rao :
>>>> As already published several times, according to the following plan:
>>>> htt
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Harald Schmalzbauer
wrote:
> schrieb Harald Schmalzbauer am 25.09.2012 20:24 (localtime):
>> schrieb Attilio Rao am 21.09.2012 02:22 (localtime):
>>> On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 3:48 AM, Attilio Rao wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 a
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 4:47 PM, Harald Schmalzbauer
wrote:
> schrieb Attilio Rao am 28.09.2012 16:18 (localtime):
>> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Harald Schmalzbauer
>> wrote:
>>> ...
>> After many people willing to test fuse on STABLE_9, I made this patch
&
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 6:15 AM, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 7:57 AM, Attilio Rao wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 4:47 PM, Harald Schmalzbauer
>> wrote:
>>> schrieb Attilio Rao am 28.09.2012 16:18 (localtime):
>>>> On Wed, Sep 26, 2
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 6:15 AM, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 7:57 AM, Attilio Rao wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 4:47 PM, Harald Schmalzbauer
>> wrote:
>>> schrieb Attilio Rao am 28.09.2012 16:18 (localtime):
>>>> On Wed, Sep 26, 2
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 1:22 AM, Attilio Rao wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 3:48 AM, Attilio Rao wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 12:18 AM, Attilio Rao wrote:
>>> 2012/7/4 Attilio Rao :
>>>> 2012/6/29 Attilio Rao :
>>>>> As already published s
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 6:53 PM, AN wrote:
>
> FreeBSD FBSD10 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #26 r241612: Tue Oct 16
> 13:03:26 EDT 2012 root@FBSD10:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/MYKERNEL amd64
>
> I loaded the module with kldload fuse.ko
>
> # kldstat
> Id Refs AddressSize Name
>
Following the plan reported here:
http://wiki.freebsd.org/NONMPSAFE_DEORBIT_VFS
We are now at the state where all non-MPSAFE filesystems are
disconnected by the three.
At this point we can proceed with the import of a revised kib's patch
as reported in that page. This will mean effectively remove
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Raoul wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Trying to mount a partition from type ntfs
> with the following conditions i get:
>
> R241700, with fusefs-libs in sync.
>
> kldload fuse
> fuse loaded
> mount -t ntfs /dev/daXsX
> not supported!
> mount_ntfs /dev/daXsX
>
On 10/21/12, Raoul MEGELAS wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Oct 2012 14:04:46 +0100
> Attilio Rao wrote:
> Hi Attilio,
>
>
>> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Raoul wrote:
>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Trying to mount a partition from type ntfs
>>> with the following
On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 10:55 PM, Raoul MEGELAS wrote:
> sorry for posting 2 times the same message!
>
>
> On Sun, 21 Oct 2012 22:07:36 +0100
> Attilio Rao wrote:
>
>>On 10/21/12, Raoul MEGELAS wrote:
>>> On Sun, 21 Oct 2012 14:04:46 +0100
>>> Attilio R
1 - 100 of 173 matches
Mail list logo
