On Thu, 9 May 2019 at 19:07, wrote:
>
> Background: Apparently a FreeBSD developer, a viking looking fellow,
> has been hiding a secret: just as many of his predecessors in the Danish
> cities during WWII (collaborators); He has a disdain for "the jews"
> collectively.
Freedom of expression e
On Friday, 10 May 2019, FreeBSD Core Team Secretary <
core-secret...@freebsd.org> wrote:
> The FreeBSD Core Team is aware of recent controversial statements made
> on social media by a FreeBSD developer. We, along with the Code of
> Conduct review committee, are investigating the matter and will
On Sun, 12 May 2019 at 18:28, Igor Mozolevsky wrote:
> On Friday, 10 May 2019, FreeBSD Core Team Secretary
> wrote:
>
> > The FreeBSD Core Team is aware of recent controversial statements made
> > on social media by a FreeBSD developer. We, along with the Code of
> &g
On Sat, 18 May 2019 at 00:10, wrote:
>
> Igor et al,
>
> Instead of debating definitions of hate speech, free speech, and trying to
> discover intent, I suggest we focus on right relationships.
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A14THPoc4-4
This is a typical example of reframing a problem in
On Sun, 19 May 2019 at 17:27, Graham Perrin wrote:
> I know, it's not appropriate to find fun in a serious discussion, but
> these six words did make me chuckle:
>
> > … freedom of expression … End of discussion.
>
> No offence intended. I was speed-reading (waiting for a browser to
> launch) and
On Sun, 19 May 2019 at 17:54, Warner Losh wrote:
>
> On Sun, May 19, 2019, 10:25 AM Graham Perrin wrote:
>
> > I know, it's not appropriate to find fun in a serious discussion, but
> > these six words did make me chuckle:
> >
> > > … freedom of expression … End of discussion.
> >
> > No offence in
On Sun, 19 May 2019 at 20:16, Warner Losh wrote:
>
> On Sun, May 19, 2019 at 11:34 AM Igor Mozolevsky wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, 19 May 2019 at 17:54, Warner Losh wrote:
>> > Yes. There will always be limits, just like in real life. You can't tell
>> >
On Mon, 20 May 2019 at 09:20, David Chisnall wrote:
>
> On 19 May 2019, at 20:43, Igor Mozolevsky wrote:
> >
> > the best
> > explanation of democracy I have ever heard was: "two wolves and a
> > sheep deciding what to have for dinner!"
>
> If you be
lly top posting :-)
>
> > On 19 May 2019, at 22:43, Igor Mozolevsky wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, 19 May 2019 at 20:16, Warner Losh wrote:
> >>
> >> On Sun, May 19, 2019 at 11:34 AM Igor Mozolevsky wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Sun, 19 May 2019 at 17:54,
On Tue, 21 May 2019 at 11:30, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> Anyway, as someone
> who has been chased upon by a gang of youths screaming "zhidovskaya
> morda" ("Jewish snout") (Moscow, USSR, circa 1975, tough
> neighbourhood, and well, I have a Jewish grandmother)
You're conflating freedom of express
On Mon, 7 Oct 2019 at 08:43, grarpamp wrote:
>
> On 10/4/19, Igor Mozolevsky wrote:
> > On Fri, 20 Sep 2019 at 22:01, grarpamp wrote:
> >>
> >> For consideration...
> >> https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-security/2019-September/010099.html
> &g
On 15 April 2016 at 17:22, Conrad Meyer wrote:
If you implement a new IO scheduler you can name it whatever you like.
> "NG" isn't any more meaningful than "Netflix."
>
True, but _NETFLIX as a suffix is bad for three reasons:
1st- it creates a precedent for every sponsoring co. to want their n
On 26 May 2016 at 14:41, Kenneth D. Merry wrote:
> On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 15:29:21 +0200, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> > On Thu, 26 May 2016 08:34:45 -0400
> > "Kenneth D. Merry" wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 08:42:53 +0200, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> > > What kind of drive is it?
> > >
> >
On 4 October 2011 19:40, Andrey Fesenko wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 5:42 AM, Ken Smith wrote:
>>
>>
>> The 9.0-RELEASE cycle will be tracked here:
>>
>> http://wiki.freebsd.org/Releng/9.0TODO
>>
>> though the schedule listed there is still way off. We'll re-work the
>> schedule some
Interestingly, while people seem to be (arguably rightly) focused on
criticising Phoronix's benchmarking, nobody has offered an alternative
benchmark; and while (again, arguably rightly) it is important to
benchmark real world performance, equally, nobody has offered any
numbers in relation to, for
On 21 December 2011 22:03, Freddie Cash wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Johan Hendriks
> wrote:
>> Nice page, but one thing i do not get is the following.
>>
>> [quote]
>> If you compare FreeBSD / GCC 4.2.1 against, for example, Ubuntu / GCC 4.7
>> then the results are unlikely to tell
On 22 December 2011 05:54, Daniel Kalchev wrote:
>
>
> On 22.12.11 00:33, Igor Mozolevsky wrote:
>>
>> Using the same argument one can say that Ferrari F430 vs Toyota Prius is a
>> meaningless comparison because the under-the-hood equipment is different.
>
>
On 22 December 2011 10:12, Daniel Kalchev wrote:
> As for how fast to get from point A to point B. If you observe speed limits,
> that will depend only on the pilot, no? :)
> Both cars are sufficiently faster than the imposed speed limits.
You are ignoring acceleration, handling, and other facto
I don't know how well it would suit your purpose, but you could always
try emacs-ide (at http://gna.org/projects/emacs-ide/ )
--
Igor M. :-)
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsu
On 7 October 2013 22:08, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
>
> On 2013-10-07, at 2:02 PM, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
>
> > I use ci/co every single day to track changes to individual config files
> on individual machines. For simple things like ntp.conf, rc.conf,
> sysctl.conf, a simple 'ci -l xxx' is a tri
On 7 October 2013 22:15, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
> Well, it has been announced, and is available as a port.
>
So there's no version control in the base at all now?.. When did FreeBSD
decide to move away from distributing a usable OS? Why not just distribute
a kernel and a few bits that are barel
On 7 October 2013 22:28, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
svnlite? :)
>
Thanks Lev & Glen- it's something to explore albeit that screws up quite a
lot of stuff on this end...
Cheers,
--
Igor M.
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebs
On 8 October 2013 01:00, Adrian Chadd wrote:
[snip]
Oh, I know it's an up-hill battle. But I honestly thought that this had
> been communicated on a list somewhere. It seems.. not. I don't know why.
> Gah.
It's been communicated at Sun, 6 Oct 2013 22:43:21 -0400, but that doesn't
meed there's
On 8 October 2013 01:58, Ian Lepore wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-10-07 at 16:49 -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> > I've asked on IRC to figure out when this was first proposed. I'll see if
> > it was announced anywhere or if Eitan snuck it in.
> >
> >
> > -a
>
> It was mentioned briefly on stable@
>
> http:
On 8 October 2013 01:59, Glen Barber wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 05:54:23PM -0700, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
>
[snip]
> > Plus, I was quite reasured that svn isn't smart enough to realize that
> > a path might be a file: url relative to the current working directory...
>
> I don't know what
On 8 October 2013 02:49, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On 10/8/13 9:33 AM, Steve Kargl wrote:
>
[snip]
>
>
Less GPL code in FreeBSD?
>>
> not a problem unless you plan in shipping a changed version of it on your
> product??
... and there's already a WITHOUT_RCS switch if the GPLed RCS is *really
On 10 October 2013 19:15, Jos Backus wrote:
> On Oct 10, 2013 9:38 AM, "Julian Elischer" wrote:
>
[snip]
> > well since people expect RCS.. it is not a no brainer.
> > you are asking people to learn a whole new tool for functionality that
> is currently very simple..
> > edit file
> > ci -
On 10 October 2013 20:36, Jos Backus wrote:
>
> On Oct 10, 2013 11:54 AM, "Igor Mozolevsky" wrote:
> >
> > On 10 October 2013 19:15, Jos Backus wrote:
> >>
> >> On Oct 10, 2013 9:38 AM, "Julian Elischer" wrote:
> >
> >
>
On 10 October 2013 21:18, Jos Backus wrote:
>
> On Oct 10, 2013 1:07 PM, "Igor Mozolevsky" wrote:
> >
>
[snip]
> > You're missing the point- the requirement is "provide a way to keep
> track of changes for file X" not "have many fancy and
On 12 October 2013 07:10, zhifeng hu wrote:
> I am noticed that the nslookup will not appear by default in freebsd 10.
> but this is a very basic tools, we need it very much more than you think.
> would you please add alias for nslookup ? such as
> alias nslookup="host -v"
>
> NOT FORCE USER TO I
On 12 October 2013 18:57, Igor Mozolevsky wrote:
>
>
>
> On 12 October 2013 07:10, zhifeng hu wrote:
>
>> I am noticed that the nslookup will not appear by default in freebsd 10.
>> but this is a very basic tools, we need it very much more than you think.
>&g
31 matches
Mail list logo
