has not boot-ROM.
--
NAKAGAWA, Yoshihisa
y-nak...@nwsl.mesh.ad.jp
nakag...@jp.freebsd.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
-Card SCSI-IF.
In PAO, another PC-Card SCSI-IF supported, but these are
2.2-stable only, not yet CAMed.
--
NAKAGAWA, Yoshihisa
y-nak...@nwsl.mesh.ad.jp
nakag...@jp.freebsd.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body
aic driver.
--
NAKAGAWA, Yoshihisa
y-nak...@nwsl.mesh.ad.jp
nakag...@jp.freebsd.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
As of a few minutes ago, a minimal set of changes to bring the so-called
'new-bus' functionality to the i386 kernel in -current.
Is this formal decision of core team ? I feel a huge despair, as a
member of newconfig project
--
NAKAGAWA, Yoshihisa
y-nak...@nwsl.mesh.ad.jp
. It is
bad decision.
--
NAKAGAWA, Yoshihisa
y-nak...@nwsl.mesh.ad.jp
nakag...@jp.freebsd.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
PC-Card VLSI 82C146 (5 mem 2 I/O windows)
It is probably TI CardBus controller, -current code not support it
correctly. You should be use PAO.
--
NAKAGAWA, Yoshihisa
y-nak...@nwsl.mesh.ad.jp
nakag...@jp.freebsd.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
I was thinking of doing this, the same as alpm and intpm:
case 0xdevid:
#if NUHCI 0
return NULL;
#else
return VIA blah USB controller;
#endif
It depends on old-config, so poor mechanism. newconfig already
implimented best match probe/attach.
--
NAKAGAWA, Yoshihisa
For the sake of the thread, this got committed a day or two ago, and these
hacks have been replaced with a low priority match.
Why do you use another mechanism of 4.4BSD ? Don't loss time and
loss inter-operability between other BSDs.
--
NAKAGAWA, Yoshihisa
y-nak...@nwsl.mesh.ad.jp
was unacceptable -- else we would have used it years ago.
It is not formal core decision.
Our policy in all areas has been that we'd rather do the Right Thing
than follow the crowd.
new-bus is wrong way. You are misunderstanding 4.4BSD mechanism.
--
NAKAGAWA, Yoshihisa
y-nak...@nwsl.mesh.ad.jp
is wrong and why the 4.4BSD scheme is
right.
Because, you are misunderstanding 4.4BSD scheme (and newconfig).
--
NAKAGAWA, Yoshihisa
y-nak...@nwsl.mesh.ad.jp
nakag...@jp.freebsd.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body
and presentation of newconfig paper.
After Usenix, still misunderstanding is exist, argument again. I
will become to explain if needed.
--
NAKAGAWA, Yoshihisa
y-nak...@nwsl.mesh.ad.jp
nakag...@jp.freebsd.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe
Any chance of getting a preview of that paper? Is it, or will it be,
available on the Web?
I don't know, probably the paper not yet available on Web. Please
ask to Furuta-san.
--
NAKAGAWA, Yoshihisa
y-nak...@nwsl.mesh.ad.jp
nakag...@jp.freebsd.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail
You bought a computer with the super-ultra-new Microsoft (tm)
Microsoft Bus (tm), for which you bought the latest and greatest
device X.
It is extremely vulgar joke. I doubt your character.
--
NAKAGAWA, Yoshihisa
y-nak...@nwsl.mesh.ad.jp
nakag...@jp.freebsd.org
barrier. English is hard
#for me. It is my weak point.
--
NAKAGAWA, Yoshihisa
y-nak...@nwsl.mesh.ad.jp
nakag...@jp.freebsd.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
with Opti Viper-M chipset.
--
NAKAGAWA, Yoshihisa
y-nak...@nwsl.mesh.ad.jp
nakag...@jp.freebsd.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
15 matches
Mail list logo
