On 06/28/10 18:56, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
Hi again,
After my most recent appeal for testers, I received some excellent
feedback and thank everyone that has tried the patch. I've ironed out a
couple of bugs and have what I hope is the import-ready candidate patch
available for a final round of
Hi again,
After my most recent appeal for testers, I received some excellent
feedback and thank everyone that has tried the patch. I've ironed out a
couple of bugs and have what I hope is the import-ready candidate patch
available for a final round of testing.
Please read on if you are able
Lawrence Stewart lstew...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 06/21/10 05:44, Rui Paulo wrote:
On 20 Jun 2010, at 20:36, Fabian Keil wrote:
Fabian Keilfreebsd-lis...@fabiankeil.de wrote:
Fabian Keilfreebsd-lis...@fabiankeil.de wrote:
My custom kernel normally doesn't have INVARIANTS and
On 06/22/10 04:52, Fabian Keil wrote:
Lawrence Stewartlstew...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 06/21/10 05:44, Rui Paulo wrote:
On 20 Jun 2010, at 20:36, Fabian Keil wrote:
Fabian Keilfreebsd-lis...@fabiankeil.de wrote:
Fabian Keilfreebsd-lis...@fabiankeil.de wrote:
My custom kernel
Hi Fabian,
On 06/20/10 03:58, Fabian Keil wrote:
Lawrence Stewartlstew...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 06/13/10 18:12, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
The time has come to solicit some external testing for my SIFTR tool.
I'm hoping to commit it within a week or so unless problems are discovered.
I'm
Lawrence Stewart lstew...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 06/20/10 03:58, Fabian Keil wrote:
Lawrence Stewartlstew...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 06/13/10 18:12, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
The time has come to solicit some external testing for my SIFTR tool.
I'm hoping to commit it within a week or so
On 06/20/10 21:15, Fabian Keil wrote:
Lawrence Stewartlstew...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 06/20/10 03:58, Fabian Keil wrote:
Lawrence Stewartlstew...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 06/13/10 18:12, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
The time has come to solicit some external testing for my SIFTR tool.
I'm
Lawrence Stewart lstew...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 06/20/10 21:15, Fabian Keil wrote:
Lawrence Stewartlstew...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 06/20/10 03:58, Fabian Keil wrote:
Lawrence Stewartlstew...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 06/13/10 18:12, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
The time has come to
On 06/20/10 22:28, Fabian Keil wrote:
Lawrence Stewartlstew...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 06/20/10 21:15, Fabian Keil wrote:
Lawrence Stewartlstew...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 06/20/10 03:58, Fabian Keil wrote:
Lawrence Stewartlstew...@freebsd.orgwrote:
On 06/13/10 18:12, Lawrence Stewart
Lawrence Stewart lstew...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 06/20/10 22:28, Fabian Keil wrote:
Lawrence Stewartlstew...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 06/20/10 21:15, Fabian Keil wrote:
Lawrence Stewartlstew...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 06/20/10 03:58, Fabian Keil wrote:
Lawrence
On 06/20/10 23:15, Fabian Keil wrote:
Lawrence Stewartlstew...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 06/20/10 22:28, Fabian Keil wrote:
Lawrence Stewartlstew...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 06/20/10 21:15, Fabian Keil wrote:
Lawrence Stewartlstew...@freebsd.orgwrote:
On 06/20/10 03:58, Fabian Keil
Fabian Keil freebsd-lis...@fabiankeil.de wrote:
Lawrence Stewart lstew...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 06/20/10 22:28, Fabian Keil wrote:
Taking pf (and altq) out of the picture doesn't seem to make
a difference.
Wouldn't have expected it to. Will be very curious to know if the panic
Fabian Keil freebsd-lis...@fabiankeil.de wrote:
Fabian Keil freebsd-lis...@fabiankeil.de wrote:
My custom kernel normally doesn't have INVARIANTS and WITNESS
enabled, so I'll try to enable them next.
The culprit seem to be non-default KTR settings in the kernel
while loading alq as a
On 20 Jun 2010, at 20:36, Fabian Keil wrote:
Fabian Keil freebsd-lis...@fabiankeil.de wrote:
Fabian Keil freebsd-lis...@fabiankeil.de wrote:
My custom kernel normally doesn't have INVARIANTS and WITNESS
enabled, so I'll try to enable them next.
The culprit seem to be non-default KTR
On 06/21/10 00:12, Fabian Keil wrote:
Fabian Keilfreebsd-lis...@fabiankeil.de wrote:
Lawrence Stewartlstew...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 06/20/10 22:28, Fabian Keil wrote:
Taking pf (and altq) out of the picture doesn't seem to make
a difference.
Wouldn't have expected it to. Will be very
On 06/21/10 05:44, Rui Paulo wrote:
On 20 Jun 2010, at 20:36, Fabian Keil wrote:
Fabian Keilfreebsd-lis...@fabiankeil.de wrote:
Fabian Keilfreebsd-lis...@fabiankeil.de wrote:
My custom kernel normally doesn't have INVARIANTS and WITNESS
enabled, so I'll try to enable them next.
The
Hello, Lawrence.
You wrote 19 июня 2010 г., 07:27:30:
Amount of feedback received thus far: nichts, nil, nada
I wanted to help you, but here is one problem: I dont have any
traffic-loaded 9-CURRENT machines. I have some not-so-critical 7.x and
8.x machines with noticeable traffic
Hi Lev,
On 06/19/10 16:26, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Hello, Lawrence.
You wrote 19 июня 2010 г., 07:27:30:
Amount of feedback received thus far: nichts, nil, nada
I wanted to help you, but here is one problem: I dont have any
traffic-loaded 9-CURRENT machines. I have some
On 13 June 2010 12:12, Lawrence Stewart lstew...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hi all,
The time has come to solicit some external testing for my SIFTR tool. I'm
hoping to commit it within a week or so unless problems are discovered.
SIFTR is a kernel module that logs a range of statistics on active TCP
Hi Pluknet,
On 06/19/10 18:48, pluknet wrote:
[snip]
Hi.
I'm seeing this right after enabling siftr via sysctl and changing ppl.
Sorry, if that was already discussed, known or unrelated (since em is
in locking chain).
lock order reversal:
1st 0x80e51568 PFil hook read/write mutex
Lawrence Stewart lstew...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 06/13/10 18:12, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
The time has come to solicit some external testing for my SIFTR tool.
I'm hoping to commit it within a week or so unless problems are discovered.
I'm interested in all feedback and reports of
Fabian Keil freebsd-lis...@fabiankeil.de wrote:
Lawrence Stewart lstew...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 06/13/10 18:12, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
The time has come to solicit some external testing for my SIFTR tool.
I'm hoping to commit it within a week or so unless problems are
Hi Fabian,
Thank you for the the report. This is indeed an issue I've never seen
before and exactly the sort of thing I wanted to uncover.
On 06/20/10 03:58, Fabian Keil wrote:
Lawrence Stewartlstew...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 06/13/10 18:12, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
The time has come to
Amount of feedback received thus far: nichts, nil, nada
*sings I'm so ronery in his best Kim Jong-il voice* [4]
Just like Uncle Sam [5], Uncle Lawrence needs you too - yes, I'm
pointing at YOU!
More specifically, people out there running current with 10-15 mins to
spare for some testing,
Hi all,
The time has come to solicit some external testing for my SIFTR tool.
I'm hoping to commit it within a week or so unless problems are discovered.
SIFTR is a kernel module that logs a range of statistics on active TCP
connections to a log file. It provides the ability to make highly
25 matches
Mail list logo
