Hello,
He also has a login on the machine for testing but it's turned off at
the moment I'll turn it on again if he asks.
I've already sent him a mail. BTW, is a simple login (I mean, for example
ssh) enough for this task? I would think at least a serial console access
is needed...
--[
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Attila Nagy wrote:
Hello,
He also has a login on the machine for testing but it's turned off at
the moment I'll turn it on again if he asks.
I've already sent him a mail. BTW, is a simple login (I mean, for example
ssh) enough for this task? I would think at least
Hello,
I'll try to reproduce the thing on my machine as soon as possible.
Perhaps it was just because it was Monday, who knows...
Meanwhile I found out that my problem is 100% reproducible.
Since then, I contacted Kirk McKusick, who told me that he will
investigate this issue.
I also gave
On Mon, 10 Feb 2003, Attila Nagy wrote:
Hello,
I'll try to reproduce the thing on my machine as soon as possible.
Perhaps it was just because it was Monday, who knows...
Meanwhile I found out that my problem is 100% reproducible.
Since then, I contacted Kirk McKusick, who told me
Hello,
I also gave him access to our machine, which has a 1.2 TB filesystem
on it.
I have a 1.9TB FS about 4 km from him..
That's great!
Could you please contact him? (do you also have this problem, BTW?)
Thanks,
--[ Free Software ISOs - http://www.fsn.hu/?f=download ]--
On Mon, 10 Feb 2003, Attila Nagy wrote:
Hello,
I also gave him access to our machine, which has a 1.2 TB filesystem
on it.
I have a 1.9TB FS about 4 km from him..
That's great!
Could you please contact him? (do you also have this problem, BTW?)
He also has a login on the machine
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 06:31:42PM +0100, Gerrit Kühn wrote:
I've been trying to reproduce this bug on my desktop. This machine has 2
80gb disks, one of which is dedicated with one slice. So far, after 8 hard
resets, I haven't had any problem with either the machine or bgfsck
hanging.
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Gerrit =?iso-8859-1?Q?
K=FChn?= writes:
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 06:31:42PM +0100, Gerrit Kühn wrote:
I've been trying to reproduce this bug on my desktop. This machine has 2
80gb disks, one of which is dedicated with one slice. So far, after 8 hard
resets, I
Just try to fsck 1.2 TB and you will be very-very patient :)
Very patient indeed. I've got a 1.0TB partition about 51% full. It's still a 4-STABLE
system and the last fsck from a crash last Friday (bad IBM, bad, no soup for you) took
just
about 55 minutes to fsck. *ugh*
I'm torture testing
Dropping the number of inodes really helps fsck time; what does df -i
/bigfilesystem print?
fs# df -i /users
Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity iusedifree %iused Mounted on
/dev/da2s1e 999089944 457994296 46116845650% 6094282 25170996 19% /users
fsize = 8192, bsize
In the last episode (Jan 30), Ryan Dooley said:
Just try to fsck 1.2 TB and you will be very-very patient :)
Very patient indeed. I've got a 1.0TB partition about 51% full.
It's still a 4-STABLE system and the last fsck from a crash last
Friday (bad IBM, bad, no soup for you) took just
Hello,
I've just installed my first 5.0-rel system and did some
torture-testing. When resetting the machine to test the backgrounded
fsck I experienced the following problem: All filesystems came back
quickly and bg fsck worked fine, except for one. I had created a large
(50GB) /export
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 11:44:03AM +0100, Attila Nagy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've just installed my first 5.0-rel system and did some
torture-testing. When resetting the machine to test the backgrounded
fsck I experienced the following problem: All filesystems came back
quickly and bg
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 11:44:03AM +0100, Attila Nagy wrote:
I've just installed my first 5.0-rel system and did some
torture-testing. When resetting the machine to test the backgrounded
fsck I experienced the following problem: All filesystems came back
quickly and bg fsck worked fine,
Hello,
47105 seems to be slightly different from what I saw, because my machine
never paniced; the fsck just hung forever.
It depends. My machine hangs, there's no panic.
I've already written to Kirk McKusick, but it seems that he has a lot
of work, because I didn't get answer.
Ok, then
On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, Vallo Kallaste wrote:
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 11:44:03AM +0100, Attila Nagy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've just installed my first 5.0-rel system and did some
torture-testing. When resetting the machine to test the backgrounded
fsck I experienced the following
On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, Andre Guibert de Bruet wrote:
I don't see it listed in 5.0-RELEASE ERRATA. Several people have now
reported problems with background fsck and in the case Kirk as
original author is loaded with other work I see no justification to
not mention the brokenness of bgfsck.
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 12:22:10PM -0500, Andre Guibert de Bruet wrote:
I've been trying to reproduce this bug on my desktop. This machine has 2
80gb disks, one of which is dedicated with one slice. So far, after 8 hard
resets, I haven't had any problem with either the machine or bgfsck
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 04:23:08PM +0100, Attila Nagy wrote:
47105 seems to be slightly different from what I saw, because my machine
never paniced; the fsck just hung forever.
It depends. My machine hangs, there's no panic.
Yes, I overlooked that in the PR when I read it first. Mine was
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 12:34:25PM -0500, Robert Watson wrote:
Following reports of problems with bgfsck during the 5.0-RC series, and
prior to the release, I spent some time adding hard disks to machines,
resetting without clean shutdowns, and then interrupting background fscks,
piles of
Hello,
I really don't know. I have a SV25 barebone system from Shuttle (VIA
Twister Chipset) and an IBM deskstar 80GB IDE HD. Does that sound
familiar to you?
Nope, mine is completely different.
It is a HP tc4100 (I think it has an Intel MOBO, but I'm not sure) with an
AHA-2940 controller and
On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, Gerrit Kühn wrote:
On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 12:34:25PM -0500, Robert Watson wrote:
Following reports of problems with bgfsck during the 5.0-RC series, and
prior to the release, I spent some time adding hard disks to machines,
resetting without clean shutdowns, and
Hi all,
I've just installed my first 5.0-rel system and did some
torture-testing. When resetting the machine to test the backgrounded
fsck I experienced the following problem:
All filesystems came back quickly and bg fsck worked fine, except for
one. I had created a large (50GB) /export
23 matches
Mail list logo
