Re: FIO* doc added to tty.4 (review)

2001-04-17 Thread John W. De Boskey
Hi, I wondered about this. However, after looking around what I found was that the FIO* requests seemed to be documented in driver pages (and only a handful at that), and not documented with ioctl. Since I don't want to change the other existing driver man pages, what if I add generic

Re: FIO* doc added to tty.4 (review)

2001-04-17 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Wed, 18 Apr 2001 06:40:38 +1000 (EST), Bruce Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Does POSIX now specify select() and/or poll() precisely enough to show that the current behaviour is wrong? In addition to more explicit requirements for sockets, draft 6 has the following to say about select() and

FIO* doc added to tty.4 (review)

2001-04-15 Thread John W. De Boskey
Hi, I've been doing some tty related work and found the FIO* requests don't seem to be documented. I've added some reasonable doc to tty.4 and put up the the diff and html forms: http://people.freebsd.org/~jwd/doc/tty.4.html http://people.freebsd.org/~jwd/doc/tty.4.diff Any comments