Re: GCC-3.1 Optimization -Os broken

2002-05-13 Thread David O'Brien
On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 07:47:42PM -0500, Loren James Rittle wrote: > I can narrow it down *much* further to exact small test cases. FYI, > there are 8 C failures in the gcc 3.1 testsuite for FreeBSD/i386: > > 4 involve -Os (Quite sorry I never got around to fixing them > before the

Re: GCC-3.1 Optimization -Os broken

2002-05-13 Thread Loren James Rittle
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write: > found the bug: -Os compilation seems broken with gcc-3.1. I normally > [...] I know any other optimization than -O isn't supported but this bug > (either in libalias or in gcc) should be investigated. I can narrow it down *much* further to exact smal

Re: GCC-3.1 Optimization -Os broken

2002-05-13 Thread David Malone
On Mon, May 13, 2002 at 09:57:08PM +0200, Daniel Rock wrote: > - recompile libalias with -Os => NAT broken > - recompile libalias with -O => NAT works again. > > I know any other optimization than -O isn't supported but this bug > (either in libalias or in gcc) should be investigated. If you co

GCC-3.1 Optimization -Os broken

2002-05-13 Thread Daniel Rock
Hi, after a "make world" I noticed that my dialout was broken (NAT for UDP packets seems to work but not for TCP). After a few tests I finally found the bug: -Os compilation seems broken with gcc-3.1. I normally compile complete world with -Os (instead of -O) (via CFLAGS=-Os in /etc/make.conf