John Baldwin wrote:
On 27-Jun-00 Edwin Culp wrote:
Donn Miller wrote:
Did you compile your kernel with any optimizations, such as -Os? If so,
try it recompiling it without optimizations.
Unfortunately, no. I wish that I had, because I'm fresh out of things to
try.
It's fixed.
On 27-Jun-00 John Baldwin wrote:
On 27-Jun-00 Edwin Culp wrote:
I have 5 machines running current. All are booting fine with the
changes made on June 12, with the exception of a k-6 laptop. I have
been booting the kernel.works since the changes and can't seem to get
something right. I
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Edwin Culp writes:
: int=000d err= eft=00010046 eip=92eb
: eax=00fb ebx= ecx=0152 edx=03f6
: esi=000fbc92 edi=000f ebp=17b4 esp=17b4
: cs:eip=0f 32 89 45 1c 89 55 14-46 eb cf 80 65 31 fd eb
: ss:esp=08 00 00 00 1c 9c 00
On Wed, 28 Jun 2000, Warner Losh wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Edwin Culp writes:
: int=000d err= eft=00010046 eip=92eb
: eax=00fb ebx= ecx=0152 edx=03f6
: esi=000fbc92 edi=000f ebp=17b4 esp=17b4
: cs:eip=0f 32 89 45 1c 89 55 14-46 eb cf
Thanks, Warner and Donn. I have been successfully building a new world and
kernel every day, except with the latest perl problems the last two days.
Today's world is in process and looks like it is going to be successful.
This means that everything is up to date. I haven't been able to boot
On 27-Jun-00 Edwin Culp wrote:
I have 5 machines running current. All are booting fine with the
changes made on June 12, with the exception of a k-6 laptop. I have
been booting the kernel.works since the changes and can't seem to get
something right. I have tried with my original kernel
On 28-Jun-00 Donn Miller wrote:
On Wed, 28 Jun 2000, Warner Losh wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Edwin Culp writes:
: int=000d err= eft=00010046 eip=92eb
: eax=00fb ebx= ecx=0152 edx=03f6
: esi=000fbc92 edi=000f ebp=17b4 esp=17b4
:
On 27-Jun-00 Edwin Culp wrote:
Donn Miller wrote:
Did you compile your kernel with any optimizations, such as -Os? If so,
try it recompiling it without optimizations.
Unfortunately, no. I wish that I had, because I'm fresh out of things to
try.
It's fixed. It wasn't a kernel problem
On Wed, Jun 28, 2000 at 10:14:27PM -0700, John Baldwin wrote:
It's fixed. It wasn't a kernel problem but a stupid bogon on my part
in btx.s. Make sure you have rev 1.19 of /sys/boot/i386/btx/btx/btx.s
and rebuild your loader.
It seems there is a different problem. Fresh -current kernel
I have 5 machines running current. All are booting fine with the
changes made on June 12, with the exception of a k-6 laptop. I have
been booting the kernel.works since the changes and can't seem to get
something right. I have tried with my original kernel configuration and
now have been
Donn Miller wrote:
Did you compile your kernel with any optimizations, such as -Os? If so,
try it recompiling it without optimizations.
Unfortunately, no. I wish that I had, because I'm fresh out of things to
try.
Thanks,
ed
- Donn
On Tue, 27 Jun 2000, Edwin Culp wrote:
I have 5
Did you compile your kernel with any optimizations, such as -Os? If so,
try it recompiling it without optimizations.
- Donn
On Tue, 27 Jun 2000, Edwin Culp wrote:
I have 5 machines running current. All are booting fine with the
changes made on June 12, with the exception of a k-6 laptop.
12 matches
Mail list logo
