In the last episode (Jan 26), Eric Jones said:
> For uses such as testing I can understand, but I don't see a use under
> normal conditions, at least on newer systems. I haven't dug into the
> source yet today, but there must be a reason why ACPI doesn't play nice
> on certain systems when MAXMEM
On Sun, 2003-01-26 at 20:55, Terry Lambert wrote:
> walt wrote:
> > Steve Kargl wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 05:08:40PM -0500, Eric Jones wrote:
> > >>Is there any reason, on newer motherboards, to need the MAXMEM option?
> > >
> > > I don't know. I've always used MAXMEM. Guess it's
> > >
walt wrote:
> Steve Kargl wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 05:08:40PM -0500, Eric Jones wrote:
> >>Is there any reason, on newer motherboards, to need the MAXMEM option?
> >
> > I don't know. I've always used MAXMEM. Guess it's
> > time to remove it from my kernel config file.
>
> FWIW, I've b
Steve Kargl wrote:
On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 05:08:40PM -0500, Eric Jones wrote:
Is there any reason, on newer motherboards, to need the MAXMEM option?
I don't know. I've always used MAXMEM. Guess it's
time to remove it from my kernel config file.
FWIW, I've been using FBSD -stable and -cu
Greetings everyone,
With the latest -CURRENTs ever since atleast September 12,
2002 that I have tested on several different
machines ranging from PII/PIII/PIV Desktop and Notebooks, whenever the
following option is added to the GENERIC kernel config, the kernel will
panic on booting up. I
Greetings everyone,
With the latest -CURRENTs that I have tested on several different
machines ranging from PII/PIII/PIV Desktop and Notebooks, whenever the
following option is added to the GENERIC kernel config, the kernel will
panic on booting up. I used this option in the January 2002
