Re: Perforce repo (was: Patch sets to date and timing tests with Giant out of userret.)

2002-02-21 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Bernd Walter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: There is still missing an overview over the p4 collections. No - I'm not going to cvsup p4-all - I already had an increasing of 1G overnight without a single warning. A p4-self collection is also missing. p4-all is not a good idea - Perforce makes

Re: Perforce repo (was: Patch sets to date and timing tests with Giant out of userret.)

2002-02-21 Thread Bernd Walter
On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 08:11:52PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: Bernd Walter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: There is still missing an overview over the p4 collections. No - I'm not going to cvsup p4-all - I already had an increasing of 1G overnight without a single warning. A p4-self

Perforce repo (was: Patch sets to date and timing tests with Giant out of userret.)

2002-02-20 Thread Greg Lehey
On Tuesday, 19 February 2002 at 0:00:19 -0800, Peter Wemm wrote: Julian Elischer wrote: I'd prefer to be working on a branch of CVS if it weren't for the people that would scream whenever I moved my merged tag up. (eek eek cvsup bloat). That way i would have a dozen people helping me but

Re: Perforce repo (was: Patch sets to date and timing tests with Giant out of userret.)

2002-02-20 Thread Bernd Walter
On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 06:31:14PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote: On Thu, 21 Feb 2002, Greg Lehey wrote: On Tuesday, 19 February 2002 at 0:00:19 -0800, Peter Wemm wrote: Am I the only person who, despite careful scrutiny, missed this announcement? I would have thought that this