Re: [current tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

2003-08-21 Thread Dag-Erling Smørgrav
Tinderbox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [nothing] The tinderbox is failing to start because it tries to acquire a lock file in the sandbox, which is currently on an NFS partition. I've therefore disabled it while John is working on getting more local disk space online for the tinderbox to use. D

Re: [current tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

2003-08-02 Thread Dag-Erling Smørgrav
Scott Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Anyone know what is up with this? I'm not getting it on my LINT builds. revision 1.41 date: 2003/08/01 17:00:49; author: obrien; state: Exp; lines: +1 -1 Fix kernel build -- 'c' was the unused var, not 'lines'. DES -- Dag-Erling Smørgrav - [EMAIL PROT

Re: [current tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

2003-08-02 Thread Scott Long
Anyone know what is up with this? I'm not getting it on my LINT builds. Scott Tinderbox wrote: TB --- 2003-08-02 06:21:10 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for i386/i386 TB --- 2003-08-02 06:21:10 - checking out the source tree TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/i386/i386 TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -

Re: [current tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

2003-07-30 Thread Harti Brandt
That was just bad luck between two related commits. Sorry. harti On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Tinderbox wrote: T>TB --- 2003-07-29 18:31:41 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for i386/i386 T>TB --- 2003-07-29 18:31:41 - checking out the source tree T>TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/i386/i386 T>TB -

Re: [-CURRENT tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

2003-07-21 Thread Terry Lambert
Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > Peter Wemm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Hmm. I thought it was gzip that was dying. Looks like its make instead, and > > is rather consistent. > > "told you so" > > > So, who has been messing with make(1) lately? > > I believe that the problem is in the kernel, not

Re: [-CURRENT tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

2003-07-21 Thread Peter Wemm
Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?= wrote: > Peter Wemm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Hmm. I thought it was gzip that was dying. Looks like its make instead, a= > nd > > is rather consistent. > > "told you so" > > > So, who has been messing with make(1) lately? > > I believe that the proble

Re: [-CURRENT tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

2003-07-21 Thread Dag-Erling Smørgrav
Peter Wemm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hmm. I thought it was gzip that was dying. Looks like its make instead, and > is rather consistent. "told you so" > So, who has been messing with make(1) lately? I believe that the problem is in the kernel, not in make(1); it just happens to be triggered

Re: [-CURRENT tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

2003-07-21 Thread Peter Wemm
Mark Murray wrote: > Peter Wemm writes: > > Tinderbox wrote: > > > > > gzip -cn /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/i386/i386/src/lib/libc/nls /c > > at > > gets.3 > catgets.3.gz > > > Segmentation fault (core dumped) > > > *** Error code 139 > > > > These false alarms are wearing a bit

Re: [-CURRENT tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

2003-07-21 Thread Mark Murray
Peter Wemm writes: > Tinderbox wrote: > > > gzip -cn /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/i386/i386/src/lib/libc/nls/c > at > gets.3 > catgets.3.gz > > Segmentation fault (core dumped) > > *** Error code 139 > > These false alarms are wearing a bit thin. Is there a problem with the > tinder

Re: [-CURRENT tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

2003-07-20 Thread Harti Brandt
On Sun, 20 Jul 2003, Peter Wemm wrote: PW>Tinderbox wrote: PW> PW>> gzip -cn /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/i386/i386/src/lib/libc/nls/cat PW>gets.3 > catgets.3.gz PW>> Segmentation fault (core dumped) PW>> *** Error code 139 PW> PW>These false alarms are wearing a bit thin. Is there a

Re: [-CURRENT tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

2003-07-20 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?= writes: >Peter Wemm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Tinderbox wrote: >> > gzip -cn >> > /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/i386/i386/src/lib/libc/nls/catgets.3 > >> > catgets.3.gz >> > Segmentation fault (core dumped) >> >

Re: [-CURRENT tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

2003-07-20 Thread Dag-Erling Smørgrav
Peter Wemm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Tinderbox wrote: > > gzip -cn > > /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/i386/i386/src/lib/libc/nls/catgets.3 > > > catgets.3.gz > > Segmentation fault (core dumped) > > *** Error code 139 > These false alarms are wearing a bit thin. Is there a problem wit

Re: [-CURRENT tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

2003-07-20 Thread Peter Wemm
Tinderbox wrote: > gzip -cn /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/i386/i386/src/lib/libc/nls/cat gets.3 > catgets.3.gz > Segmentation fault (core dumped) > *** Error code 139 These false alarms are wearing a bit thin. Is there a problem with the tinderbox build machine perhaps? Cheers, -Pet

Re: [-CURRENT tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

2003-07-15 Thread John
- Tinderbox's Original Message - > >>> Building an up-to-date make(1) > >>> Kernel build for LINT started on Tue Jul 15 07:38:30 GMT 2003 > [...] > dbdisply.o: In function `AcpiDbDisplayArguments': > dbdisply.o(.text+0x69c): undefined reference to `AcpiDmDisplayArguments' > dbdisply.o: In f

Re: [-CURRENT tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

2003-07-02 Thread Gordon Tetlow
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 05:48:47PM +, Tinderbox wrote: > TB --- 2003-07-02 17:10:04 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for i386/i386 > TB --- 2003-07-02 17:10:04 - checking out the source tree > TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/i386/i386 > TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd

Re: [-CURRENT tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

2003-06-24 Thread Julian Elischer
I've fixed the breakage and I'll commit other fixes pointed out by ru.. seems a pity to back it out just for that.. On Tue, 24 Jun 2003, Maksim Yevmenkin wrote: > > Hello, > > please disconnect usr.bin/bluetooth and usr.sbin/bluetooth from the build > for now. i'm working on the patch to fix

Re: [-CURRENT tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

2003-06-24 Thread Maksim Yevmenkin
Hello, please disconnect usr.bin/bluetooth and usr.sbin/bluetooth from the build for now. i'm working on the patch to fix this. sorry about this. thanks, max > TB --- 2003-06-24 17:27:15 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for i386/i386 > TB --- 2003-06-24 17:27:15 - checking out the source tree >

Re: [-CURRENT tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

2003-06-07 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Tinderbox wri tes: > /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/i386/i386/src/sys/geom/geom_dev.c >/vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/i386/i386/src/sys/geom/geom_dev.c:81: >conflicting types for `g_dev_print' >/vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/i386/i386/src/sys/