Have you checked for BIOS updates? The BIOS on recent Skylake laptops
have been a running disaster. At least the Dell XPS laptops had ACPI
errors be fixed by an update.
-M
On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 10:43 PM, Ben Woods wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I get the following ACPI errors
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 11:30:49PM +0200, Martin wrote:
I have more problems to report with the ACPI support and will submit a
PR, if you want. I don't know when this got broken.
...
As you can see I recompiled today to confirm that the problem
still exists. This is only about floppy.
Am Do, 2003-09-04 um 23.56 schrieb David O'Brien:
Athlon-based?
No.
CPU: Pentium III/Pentium III Xeon/Celeron (501.14-MHz 686-class CPU)
Origin = GenuineIntel Id = 0x673 Stepping = 3
Features=0x383f9ffFPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,MMX,FXSR,SSE
It's an
Martin wrote:
Hi,
I have more problems to report with the ACPI support and will submit a
PR, if you want. I don't know when this got broken.
Here some pieces of my dmesg:
---
FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT #0: Thu Sep 4 22:38:56 CEST 2003
[...]
acpi0: ABIT AWRDACPI on motherboard
Take a look at PR
It would help if you would tell me when you last had a working kernel.
The output of acpidump -t -d -o martin.dsdt martin.asl would also help.
-Nate
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 09:11:23AM +0200, Maikel Verheijen wrote:
I have recently installed FreeBSD 5.1 on my Dell C800 laptop, and I get
quite a lot (well: 48 :) of these errors on boot:
ACPI-0293: *** Warning: Buffer created with zero length in AML
-0166: *** Error: UtAllocate:
At 06:04 PM 3/16/2003, Matt wrote:
Hi,
I have just recently installed -CURRENT on my desktop as I've been using it
succesfully on a server for months now. However this desktop has much more
advanced hardware. Whilst it does work perfectly and I have device support for
everything I get a lot of
It seems like the fix right now is to disable it.
Put this line:
hint.acpi.0.disabled=1
in /boot/device.hints
Thankyou, this has given me a nice clean bootup now and I can reboot without
it panicing.
I'm still curious to learn what all that stuff ment though!
---
Matt ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, Adrian Neumaier wrote:
on of the problems this here:
ACPI-0432: *** Error: Handler for [EmbeddedControl] returned AE_ERROR
ACPI-1287: *** Error: Method execution failed, AE_ERROR
ACPI-0432: *** Error: Handler for [EmbeddedControl] returned AE_ERROR
ACPI-1287: *** Error:
On Thu, 28 Nov 2002 13:38:13 +0900 (JST), Mitsuru IWASAKI
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Mitsuru The patches against today's CURRENT at:
Mitsuru
http://people.freebsd.org/~iwasaki/acpi/acpica-20021118-20021122-test20021128.diff
Mitsuru Please try this if you have problems about ACPI
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Hongbo Li wrot
e:
I installed FBSD-current on my laptop(IBM Thinkpad
A21m). These were some error messages about ACPI in
dmesg:
system power profile changed to 'economy'
ACPI-0432: *** Error: Handler for
[EmbeddedControl] returned AE_ERROR
ACPI-1287: ***
AWRDACPI, //TABLE ID
0x1000 //OEM Revision
)
Bob
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Seck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, November 30, 2002 4:34 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [acpi-jp 2009] Re: ACPI
, November 30, 2002 4:34 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [acpi-jp 2009] Re: ACPI errors w/ latest ACPI code on GA BX2000
based system
* Mitsuru IWASAKI ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Iwasaki-san,
list members,
ACPI-0438: *** Error: Looking up [FAN_] in namespace
Hi, Intel folks.
It seems that there is a bug in cached object utilization.
This causes strange behavior;
first evaluation of \_SB_.PCI0.LPC_.EC__.BAT0._BST is OK, but
second (or later) evaluation returns AE_TYPE.
acpi_cmbat0: error fetching current battery status -- AE_TYPE
The raw DSDT is at:
On Tue, 26 Nov 2002 14:33:09 +0900 (JST), Mitsuru IWASAKI
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Mitsuru Hi,
Mitsuru Are you trying this with acpica-unix-20021118 patch which was
Mitsuru announced recently?
Mitsuru
]
Subject: Re: [acpi-jp 1988] Re: ACPI errors and then panic - fixed!
Hi, Intel folks.
It seems that there is a bug in cached object utilization.
This causes strange behavior;
first evaluation of \_SB_.PCI0.LPC_.EC__.BAT0._BST is OK, but
second (or later) evaluation returns AE_TYPE.
acpi_cmbat0: error
'; Grover, Andrew; Moore, Robert
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [acpi-jp 1988] Re: ACPI errors and then panic - fixed!
The deleted object problem has been fixed in the 20021122
release which should be available soon, if not already. (I
was able
Hi,
Our web person is out today, so things will be posted Monday at the
earliest.
I'll email Iwasaki-san the latest release, so y'all can get going if you
want.
Thank you!
I've just confirmed that the deleted object problem had been solved in
the latest release (Andy sent it to me).
I'll
Hi all,
Our web person is out today, so things will be posted Monday at the
earliest.
I'll email Iwasaki-san the latest release, so y'all can get going if you
want.
Thank you!
I've just confirmed that the deleted object problem had been solved in
the latest release (Andy sent it
* De: Mitsuru IWASAKI [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2002-11-27 ]
[ Subjecte: Call for testers: acpica-unix-20021122 (was Re: ACPI errors and
then panic - fixed!) ]
The patches against today's CURRENT at:
http://people.freebsd.org/~iwasaki/acpi/acpica-20021118-20021122-test20021128.diff
On Thu, 21 Nov 2002, Mitsuru IWASAKI wrote:
On Sat, 5 Oct 2002, Mitsuru IWASAKI wrote:
From: Nate Lawson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ACPI errors and then panic
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 17:14:31 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
My laptop appears to work ok without ACPI
Hi,
Are you trying this with acpica-unix-20021118 patch which was
announced recently?
http://people.freebsd.org/~iwasaki/acpi/acpica-20021002-20021118-test20021121.diff
Also [EMAIL PROTECTED] is better place for ACPI CA related
problem reports.
Thanks
From: Sid Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
On Sat, 5 Oct 2002, Mitsuru IWASAKI wrote:
From: Nate Lawson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ACPI errors and then panic
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 17:14:31 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
My laptop appears to work ok without ACPI but of course I don't get
suspend, resume,
On Sat, 5 Oct 2002, Mitsuru IWASAKI wrote:
From: Nate Lawson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ACPI errors and then panic
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 17:14:31 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
My laptop appears to work ok without ACPI but of course I don't get
suspend, resume, etc. I have
Thank you for the reply.
On Sat, 5 Oct 2002, Mitsuru IWASAKI wrote:
Hi,
# ACPI CA related problem should be sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# so that Intel folks can be aware of the problem.
Ok, I didn't know that.
From: Nate Lawson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ACPI errors and then panic
Date:
Hi,
# ACPI CA related problem should be sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# so that Intel folks can be aware of the problem.
From: Nate Lawson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ACPI errors and then panic
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 17:14:31 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
My laptop appears to work ok
[move to -current because STABLE don't have acpica support yet]
Hi,
System: TOS 5005-S504
Error with any kernel build:
Using $PIR table, 0 entries at 0xc00f0190
ACPI-0171: *** Error: AcpiLoadTables: RSDP Failed validation: AE_BAD_SIGNATURE
ACPI-0213: *** Error: AcpiLoadTables: Could not
It seems Mitsuru IWASAKI wrote:
[move to -current because STABLE don't have acpica support yet]
Hi,
System: TOS 5005-S504
Error with any kernel build:
Using $PIR table, 0 entries at 0xc00f0190
ACPI-0171: *** Error: AcpiLoadTables: RSDP Failed validation: AE_BAD_SIGNATURE
-Original Message-
From: Mitsuru IWASAKI [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sun 8/4/2002 8:59 AM
To: Robert D Hughes
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ACPI errors
[move to -current because STABLE don't have acpica support yet]
I
Mitsuru IWASAKI wrote:
[move to -current because STABLE don't have acpica support yet]
Hi,
System: TOS 5005-S504
Error with any kernel build:
Using $PIR table, 0 entries at 0xc00f0190
ACPI-0171: *** Error: AcpiLoadTables: RSDP Failed validation: AE_BAD_SIGNAT
URE
ACPI-0213:
I'm getting this with the recent ACPI code, should I worry about it?
acpi_cpu0: CPU on acpi0
acpi_cpu: CLK_VAL field overflows P_CNT register
acpi_cpu: CLK_VAL field overlaps THT_EN bit
You shouldn't worry about it, no. I need to get my hands on some more
details so that I can understand
On Mon, Sep 03, 2001 at 04:20:57PM -0700, Mike Smith wrote:
I'm getting this with the recent ACPI code, should I worry about it?
acpi_cpu0: CPU on acpi0
acpi_cpu: CLK_VAL field overflows P_CNT register
acpi_cpu: CLK_VAL field overlaps THT_EN bit
You shouldn't worry about it, no. I
On 03-Sep-01 Mike Smith wrote:
I'm getting this with the recent ACPI code, should I worry about it?
acpi_cpu0: CPU on acpi0
acpi_cpu: CLK_VAL field overflows P_CNT register
acpi_cpu: CLK_VAL field overlaps THT_EN bit
You shouldn't worry about it, no. I need to get my hands on some more
33 matches
Mail list logo