Re: clock drift in -CURRENT

2002-05-04 Thread Daniel Rock
Daniel Rock schrieb: >My kernel war relatively recent at the time of last boot - build >around March 2nd from -CURRENT sources a few hours before. > >If someone runs -CURRENT with default HZ of 100 and moans 247 days >later, his -CURRENT cannot be called -CURRENT any more... > >I am now running a

Re: clock drift in -CURRENT

2002-05-01 Thread Daniel Rock
Bill Fenner schrieb: > > I had the same symptoms (drifting about 2 minutes an hour) on sources > before April 17 or so. Since then, ntpd has only logged 5 time updates, > as opposed to 3 per hour. > The drift wasn't visible immediately, but only after the "magical" 49.7 days or 2^31 clock ticks.

Re: clock drift in -CURRENT

2002-05-01 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Daniel Rock writes: >Poul-Henning Kamp schrieb: >> >> When was your source tree from on that kernel ? >> >> I'm not too confident in your diagnosis, mostly because we don't >> have a counter like you describe :-) >> >> My guess is that ntpd get confused. >> >> P

Re: clock drift in -CURRENT

2002-05-01 Thread Daniel Rock
Poul-Henning Kamp schrieb: > > When was your source tree from on that kernel ? > > I'm not too confident in your diagnosis, mostly because we don't > have a counter like you describe :-) > > My guess is that ntpd get confused. > > Please try a newer kernel, a number of bug(lets) have been fixe

Re: clock drift in -CURRENT

2002-05-01 Thread Bill Fenner
I had the same symptoms (drifting about 2 minutes an hour) on sources before April 17 or so. Since then, ntpd has only logged 5 time updates, as opposed to 3 per hour. Bill To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: clock drift in -CURRENT

2002-05-01 Thread Bruce Evans
On Wed, 1 May 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > When was your source tree from on that kernel ? > > I'm not too confident in your diagnosis, mostly because we don't > have a counter like you describe :-) >From kern_clock.c: %%% int ticks; %%% but this is treated as an cyclic counter so its

Re: clock drift in -CURRENT

2002-05-01 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
When was your source tree from on that kernel ? I'm not too confident in your diagnosis, mostly because we don't have a counter like you describe :-) My guess is that ntpd get confused. Please try a newer kernel, a number of bug(lets) have been fixed since march. If it happens again, please e

Re: Clock Drift

2001-10-31 Thread Beech Rintoul
On Tuesday 30 October 2001 06:17 pm, Dreamtime.net Inc. wrote: > A while back I read a thread regarding clock drift. We are now having the > same problem. Does anyone know what the remedy is for this? Thanks. > > Sincerely, > > Stephen H. Kapit > I had the same problem a couple of months ago. Try