On Tue, 17 Dec 2002, Kirk McKusick wrote:
> Please send me a `dumpfs /usr | head -50' output of the filesystem
> under the current system. Then clean it up with fsck and run the
> same command again. Finally, boot up under the old kernel and
> get the output both before and after fsck cleaning. Wha
I've run into similar problems dual-booting 4.x and 5.x. Is there
some utility one can use to synchronize this once and for all?
IMHO, when the UFS1 superblock was changed, it should have been named
something else like UFS1_1 to avoid confusion.
gtf
--
Geoffrey T. Falk, BSc, MA, SCJ2P, SCSSadm7,
7 Dec 2002 12:14:12 -0800 (PST)
From: Nate Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Kirk McKusick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Data corruption in soft updates?
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-ASK-Info: Whitelist match
On Mon, 9 Dec 2002, Kirk McKusick wrote:
&g
On Mon, 9 Dec 2002, Kirk McKusick wrote:
> It appears that you are getting all those errors (BAD block)
> because fsck thinks that your filesystem is smaller than it
> really is. If you do a dumpfs on the filesystem and check
> the size (about line 5), I expect that you will find that
> all those b
On Mon, 9 Dec 2002, Kirk McKusick wrote:
> Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 18:04:03 -0800 (PST)
> From: Nate Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> I started getting kernel messages of "bad inode". I quickly
> rebooted to single user and ran fsck and got a huge set of
> errors. See t
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 18:04:03 -0800 (PST)
From: Nate Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Data corruption in soft updates?
X-ASK-Info: Whitelist match
I rebuilt my kernel with today's current + the
