Re: Recent fdc(4) commit broke Alpha kernels

2001-12-18 Thread Warner Losh
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Joerg Wunsch writes: : Cc goes to [EMAIL PROTECTED]: what is the politically correct way to : distinguish a PC-type architecture (in that case one that uses a : PC-style RTC memory to store configuration information) from another : architecture that uses IA32 CPUs (l

Re: Recent fdc(4) commit broke Alpha kernels

2001-12-18 Thread Joerg Wunsch
Ruslan Ermilov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Oops sorry, that was Joerg. It's fixed now, although i'm still not convinces that using __i386__ is the right thing. If our defines several constants for _MACHINE_ARCH, they should all be distint for the various machines. As it seems now, all of the

Re: Recent fdc(4) commit broke Alpha kernels

2001-12-18 Thread Wilko Bulte
On Tue, Dec 18, 2001 at 08:09:18PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: s/Soren/Joerg/ And yes, he knows about it. Wilko > Soren! > > I bet someone else already mentioned your commit broke Alpha kernels. > > Index: fd.c > === > RCS file

Re: Recent fdc(4) commit broke Alpha kernels

2001-12-18 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Tue, Dec 18, 2001 at 10:35:39AM -0800, John Baldwin wrote: > > On 18-Dec-01 Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > Soren! > > > > I bet someone else already mentioned your commit broke Alpha kernels. > > S?ren didn't commit this, adn there has already been a discussion on this list > about it as it broke

RE: Recent fdc(4) commit broke Alpha kernels

2001-12-18 Thread John Baldwin
On 18-Dec-01 Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > Soren! > > I bet someone else already mentioned your commit broke Alpha kernels. Søren didn't commit this, adn there has already been a discussion on this list about it as it broke all non-i386 kernels. -- John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <>< http://www