Re: Virus alert, was: Re: SCSI Question

2000-07-09 Thread Marcel Moolenaar
Ben Smithurst wrote: > > Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven wrote: > > > -On [2709 21:20], Leif Neland ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > >> These messages are infected with the kak virus. See > >> http://www.cai.com/virusinfo/encyclopedia/descriptions/wscript.htm > > > > Am I the only one to NOT see t

Re: Virus alert, was: Re: SCSI Question

2000-07-09 Thread Ben Smithurst
Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven wrote: > -On [2709 21:20], Leif Neland ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: >> These messages are infected with the kak virus. See >> http://www.cai.com/virusinfo/encyclopedia/descriptions/wscript.htm > > Am I the only one to NOT see this? > > Both the original postings

Re: Virus alert, was: Re: SCSI Question

2000-07-09 Thread Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven
-On [2709 22:40], Paul Herman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: >On Sun, 9 Jul 2000, Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven wrote: > >> -On [2709 21:20], Leif Neland ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: >> >These messages are infected with the kak virus. See >> >http://www.cai.com/virusinfo/encyclopedia/description

Re: Virus alert, was: Re: SCSI Question

2000-07-09 Thread Paul Herman
On Sun, 9 Jul 2000, Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven wrote: > -On [2709 21:20], Leif Neland ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > >These messages are infected with the kak virus. See > >http://www.cai.com/virusinfo/encyclopedia/descriptions/wscript.htm > > Am I the only one to NOT see this? Probably no

Re: Virus alert, was: Re: SCSI Question

2000-07-09 Thread Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven
-On [2709 21:20], Leif Neland ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: >These messages are infected with the kak virus. See >http://www.cai.com/virusinfo/encyclopedia/descriptions/wscript.htm Am I the only one to NOT see this? Both the original postings look normal in mutt whichever way I use to look at t

Virus alert, was: Re: SCSI Question

2000-07-09 Thread Leif Neland
These messages are infected with the kak virus. See http://www.cai.com/virusinfo/encyclopedia/descriptions/wscript.htm - Original Message - From: Josh Paetzel To: Robert Small ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, January 14, 1990 6:02 AM Subject: Re: SCSI Question

Re: SCSI Question

2000-07-09 Thread Damon Hammis
The jumpers aren't set right. If they aren't set right FreeBSD will recognize the card at boot, but it won't be able to probe it at all. At 01:59 PM 7/8/00 -0500, Robert Small wrote: >Damon Hammis wrote: > > > The jumpers are set wrong on the card. I had the exact same problem with > > an aha-

Re: SCSI Question

2000-07-08 Thread Josh Paetzel
  - Original Message - From: Robert Small To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, July 08, 2000 5:45 PM Subject: SCSI Question Damon Hammis wrote:> The jumpers are set wrong on the card.  I had the exact same problem with> an aha-1542 a

Re: SCSI Question

2000-07-07 Thread Josh Paetzel
- Original Message - From: "Robert Small" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD. ORG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, July 07, 2000 6:49 AM Subject: SCSI Question > I installed an Adaptec AHA-1542 controller in my system tonight, and > hooked up a Son

Re: SCSI Question

2000-07-07 Thread Damon Hammis
The jumpers are set wrong on the card. I had the exact same problem with an aha-1542 and aha-1540 card recently. The docs on the jumpers that you can get on Adaptec's site are kind of cryptic, but the card will work once you get the jumpers placed correctly. Currently I have mine running at irq