On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 4:06 AM, Thomas Mueller
< wrote:
> Since I have plenty of disk space on the new computer, I was planning to keep
> the BETA1 partition and install BETA2 to a separate partition.
>
> FreeBSD 9.0 BETA1 is the first hard drive OS on the new computer, not
> counting the nonwork
Since I have plenty of disk space on the new computer, I was planning to keep
the BETA1 partition and install BETA2 to a separate partition.
FreeBSD 9.0 BETA1 is the first hard drive OS on the new computer, not counting
the nonworking NetBSD installation; I am not upgrading from 8.x.
Since I ha
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 4:42 AM, b. f. wrote:
>> I think I'll rebuild all ports, and more, maybe I should make and keep
>> packages in case I can't update to BETA3 in place.
>
> If you want to be on the safe side, a complete rebuild is probably a
> good idea -- and moreover, one that removes all p
> I think I'll rebuild all ports, and more, maybe I should make and keep
> packages in case I can't update to BETA3 in place.
If you want to be on the safe side, a complete rebuild is probably a
good idea -- and moreover, one that removes all ports and cleans out
${PREFIX} and ${PKG_DBDIR} before
From: Kostik Belousov
> The bump was done for BETA2, see r225227, done on 2011-08-28.
> The bump has much less scope since we did the ABI analysis and
> only bumped the libraries which interfaces changed in incompatible
> way and which were not yet bumped. See the referenced commit for
> the libr
On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 09:14:12AM +, "Thomas Mueller
When FreeBSD 9.0_BETA1 was announced, the announcement included a notice that
> shared library version would be updated some time prior to BETA2, which would
> necessitate rebuilding all ports.
>
> Has this happened yet? I don't want t
