On Sun, 9 Feb 2003 22:47:47 +1100 (EST), Bruce Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
_fpathconf() is quite different from __semctl. It is not a syscall.
It is a weak alias for fpathconf() which is prototyped normally in
unistd.h. The prototype for fpathconf() should be turned into
a prototype for
On Thu, 13 Feb 2003, Garrett Wollman wrote:
On Sun, 9 Feb 2003 22:47:47 +1100 (EST), Bruce Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
_fpathconf() is quite different from __semctl. It is not a syscall.
It is a weak alias for fpathconf() which is prototyped normally in
unistd.h. The prototype for
On Sat, 8 Feb 2003, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 02:59:30PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Can someone take a look at lib/libc/gen/semctl.c and tell me where
the __semctl() sysctl should be prototyped?
Also _fpathconf() in lib/libc/gen/statvfs.c
_fpathconf() is quite
On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 10:47:47PM +1100, Bruce Evans wrote:
On Sat, 8 Feb 2003, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 02:59:30PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Can someone take a look at lib/libc/gen/semctl.c and tell me where
the __semctl() sysctl should be prototyped?
Also
On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 03:06:27PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 02:59:30PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Can someone take a look at lib/libc/gen/semctl.c and tell me where
the __semctl() sysctl should be prototyped?
Also _fpathconf() in lib/libc/gen/statvfs.c