Re: _fpathconf() and __semctl() prototypes

2003-02-13 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Sun, 9 Feb 2003 22:47:47 +1100 (EST), Bruce Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: _fpathconf() is quite different from __semctl. It is not a syscall. It is a weak alias for fpathconf() which is prototyped normally in unistd.h. The prototype for fpathconf() should be turned into a prototype for

Re: _fpathconf() and __semctl() prototypes

2003-02-13 Thread Bruce Evans
On Thu, 13 Feb 2003, Garrett Wollman wrote: On Sun, 9 Feb 2003 22:47:47 +1100 (EST), Bruce Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: _fpathconf() is quite different from __semctl. It is not a syscall. It is a weak alias for fpathconf() which is prototyped normally in unistd.h. The prototype for

Re: _fpathconf() and __semctl() prototypes

2003-02-09 Thread Bruce Evans
On Sat, 8 Feb 2003, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 02:59:30PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: Can someone take a look at lib/libc/gen/semctl.c and tell me where the __semctl() sysctl should be prototyped? Also _fpathconf() in lib/libc/gen/statvfs.c _fpathconf() is quite

Re: _fpathconf() and __semctl() prototypes

2003-02-09 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 10:47:47PM +1100, Bruce Evans wrote: On Sat, 8 Feb 2003, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 02:59:30PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: Can someone take a look at lib/libc/gen/semctl.c and tell me where the __semctl() sysctl should be prototyped? Also

Re: _fpathconf() and __semctl() prototypes

2003-02-08 Thread Maxim Sobolev
On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 03:06:27PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 02:59:30PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: Can someone take a look at lib/libc/gen/semctl.c and tell me where the __semctl() sysctl should be prototyped? Also _fpathconf() in lib/libc/gen/statvfs.c