Re: cvs commit: src/etc pccard.conf.sample

1999-10-28 Thread andrews
At 01:46 AM 10/27/99 -0700, you wrote: Are you *SURE* this is CardBus? AFAIK, we don't yet (at least pre-Warner's new pcic code) support CardBus. Hrmm.. I could have sworn it was a CardBus card: http://www.3com.com/client/mcd/products/3ccfe574btsp.html Perhaps I was just seeing things,

Re: cvs commit: src/etc pccard.conf.sample

1999-10-28 Thread Bill Fumerola
On Thu, 28 Oct 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have friends who happen to have Xircom multifunc cards (which _are_ CardBus) - would you guys like me to try and test them? I can get them long enough to test them out with the newconfig functionality. There are two versions of the XIRCOM

Re: cvs commit: src/etc pccard.conf.sample

1999-10-28 Thread Warner Losh
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bill Fumerola writes: : There are two versions of the XIRCOM realport multifunc cards, : one that is Cardbus and one that isn't. I have the latter. : if_xe is broken now, BTW. I have at least one Xircom card which I plan to make work, if at all possible, with the

Re: cvs commit: src/etc pccard.conf.sample

1999-10-27 Thread David O'Brien
On Wed, Oct 27, 1999 at 12:02:13AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At 09:53 PM 10/25/99 -0700, you wrote: kuriyama1999/10/25 21:53:29 PDT Modified files:(Branch: RELENG_3) etc pccard.conf.sample Log: MFC: Add Allied Telesis CentreCOM LA-PCM_V2

Re: cvs commit: src/etc pccard.conf.sample

1999-10-27 Thread Jun Kuriyama
From: "David O'Brien" [EMAIL PROTECTED] # 3Com Megahertz 3C574B (3CCFE574BT) Isn't this just a rebadged (and slightly tweaked) 3Com 3c574tx? I think so. We should add that new card, isn't it? Will, could you send me result of "pccardc dumpcis"? Jun Kuriyama // [EMAIL PROTECTED] To

Re: cvs commit: src/etc pccard.conf.sample

1999-10-26 Thread andrews
At 09:53 PM 10/25/99 -0700, you wrote: kuriyama1999/10/25 21:53:29 PDT Modified files:(Branch: RELENG_3) etc pccard.conf.sample Log: MFC: Add Allied Telesis CentreCOM LA-PCM_V2 entry. Here's another (works only under 4.0-CURRENT, as this particular