Warner Losh wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Steve Kargl
>writes:
> : I get an instance panic if I start lpd, so I doubt you can make
> : lpr performance any worse ;-) The printer is connected to the
> : parallel port. On my work machine, lpd/lpr work fine, but the
> : printer is conne
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Steve Kargl writes:
: I get an instance panic if I start lpd, so I doubt you can make
: lpr performance any worse ;-) The printer is connected to the
: parallel port. On my work machine, lpd/lpr work fine, but the
: printer is connected via tcp/ip.
I can start l
John Baldwin wrote:
>
> without causing problems. However, it may be that a sleep mutex wouldn't be
> but so evil. If desired I can whip up a patch to do that instead and see how
> much worse it is. It would probably hurt lpr performance a bit unless the
> ppbus was fixed to do its own multipl
