In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Bruce Evans writes:
On Sat, 5 Oct 2002, Steve Kargl wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Steve Kargl w
rites:
root[208] cdcontrol play
cdcontrol: no CD device name specified, defaulting to /dev/cd0c
cdcontrol: /dev/cd0cc: No such file or directory
Why
On Sun, 6 Oct 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Bruce Evans writes:
On Sat, 5 Oct 2002, Steve Kargl wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Steve Kargl w
rites:
root[208] cdcontrol play
cdcontrol: no CD device name specified, defaulting to /dev/cd0c
On Sun, Oct 06, 2002 at 08:29:52AM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
The first c is part of the standard name for the whole of a (labelled)
disk device.
It's not any standard name. It is a convention used on a minority
of UNIX platforms out there, and it is certainly not standard even
for
On Sun, 6 Oct 2002, David O'Brien wrote:
Since when hasn't it been standard on BSD based systems? Other than
recently on FreeBSD, all other BSD systems I've used, the c partition
has been necessary when wanting to operate on the entire disk.
Has our CDROM driver ever supported multiple ISO
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Matthew N. Dodd w
rites:
On Sun, 6 Oct 2002, David O'Brien wrote:
Since when hasn't it been standard on BSD based systems? Other than
recently on FreeBSD, all other BSD systems I've used, the c partition
has been necessary when wanting to operate on the entire
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Steve Kargl w
rites:
root[208] cdcontrol play
cdcontrol: no CD device name specified, defaulting to /dev/cd0c
cdcontrol: /dev/cd0cc: No such file or directory
Why is an extra c appended to cd0c?
The first c is part of the standard name for
On Sun, 6 Oct 2002 06:08:44 -0400 (EDT), Matthew N. Dodd [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Has our CDROM driver ever supported multiple ISO filesystems per CD? Has
it supported multi-session CDROMs? The notion of partitions on CDROMs is
a little ambiguous. I'm hoping that GEOM can improve this.
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Steve Kargl w
rites:
root[208] cdcontrol play
cdcontrol: no CD device name specified, defaulting to /dev/cd0c
cdcontrol: /dev/cd0cc: No such file or directory
Why is an extra c appended to cd0c?
That's not devfs, that's cdcontrol.
It should be fixed to use
On Sun, Oct 06, 2002 at 12:19:46AM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Steve Kargl w
rites:
root[208] cdcontrol play
cdcontrol: no CD device name specified, defaulting to /dev/cd0c
cdcontrol: /dev/cd0cc: No such file or directory
Why is an extra c appended to
On Sat, Oct 05, 2002 at 03:39:47PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Sun, Oct 06, 2002 at 12:19:46AM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Steve Kargl w
rites:
root[208] cdcontrol play
cdcontrol: no CD device name specified, defaulting to /dev/cd0c
cdcontrol:
On Sat, 5 Oct 2002, Steve Kargl wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Steve Kargl w
rites:
root[208] cdcontrol play
cdcontrol: no CD device name specified, defaulting to /dev/cd0c
cdcontrol: /dev/cd0cc: No such file or directory
Why is an extra c appended to cd0c?
The first c is
11 matches
Mail list logo