Re: devfs oddity?

2002-10-06 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Bruce Evans writes: On Sat, 5 Oct 2002, Steve Kargl wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Steve Kargl w rites: root[208] cdcontrol play cdcontrol: no CD device name specified, defaulting to /dev/cd0c cdcontrol: /dev/cd0cc: No such file or directory Why

Re: devfs oddity?

2002-10-06 Thread Bruce Evans
On Sun, 6 Oct 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Bruce Evans writes: On Sat, 5 Oct 2002, Steve Kargl wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Steve Kargl w rites: root[208] cdcontrol play cdcontrol: no CD device name specified, defaulting to /dev/cd0c

Re: devfs oddity?

2002-10-06 Thread David O'Brien
On Sun, Oct 06, 2002 at 08:29:52AM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: The first c is part of the standard name for the whole of a (labelled) disk device. It's not any standard name. It is a convention used on a minority of UNIX platforms out there, and it is certainly not standard even for

Re: devfs oddity?

2002-10-06 Thread Matthew N. Dodd
On Sun, 6 Oct 2002, David O'Brien wrote: Since when hasn't it been standard on BSD based systems? Other than recently on FreeBSD, all other BSD systems I've used, the c partition has been necessary when wanting to operate on the entire disk. Has our CDROM driver ever supported multiple ISO

Re: devfs oddity?

2002-10-06 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Matthew N. Dodd w rites: On Sun, 6 Oct 2002, David O'Brien wrote: Since when hasn't it been standard on BSD based systems? Other than recently on FreeBSD, all other BSD systems I've used, the c partition has been necessary when wanting to operate on the entire

Re: devfs oddity?

2002-10-06 Thread Nate Williams
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Steve Kargl w rites: root[208] cdcontrol play cdcontrol: no CD device name specified, defaulting to /dev/cd0c cdcontrol: /dev/cd0cc: No such file or directory Why is an extra c appended to cd0c? The first c is part of the standard name for

Re: devfs oddity?

2002-10-06 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Sun, 6 Oct 2002 06:08:44 -0400 (EDT), Matthew N. Dodd [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Has our CDROM driver ever supported multiple ISO filesystems per CD? Has it supported multi-session CDROMs? The notion of partitions on CDROMs is a little ambiguous. I'm hoping that GEOM can improve this.

Re: devfs oddity?

2002-10-05 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Steve Kargl w rites: root[208] cdcontrol play cdcontrol: no CD device name specified, defaulting to /dev/cd0c cdcontrol: /dev/cd0cc: No such file or directory Why is an extra c appended to cd0c? That's not devfs, that's cdcontrol. It should be fixed to use

Re: devfs oddity?

2002-10-05 Thread Steve Kargl
On Sun, Oct 06, 2002 at 12:19:46AM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Steve Kargl w rites: root[208] cdcontrol play cdcontrol: no CD device name specified, defaulting to /dev/cd0c cdcontrol: /dev/cd0cc: No such file or directory Why is an extra c appended to

Re: devfs oddity?

2002-10-05 Thread Steve Kargl
On Sat, Oct 05, 2002 at 03:39:47PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: On Sun, Oct 06, 2002 at 12:19:46AM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Steve Kargl w rites: root[208] cdcontrol play cdcontrol: no CD device name specified, defaulting to /dev/cd0c cdcontrol:

Re: devfs oddity?

2002-10-05 Thread Bruce Evans
On Sat, 5 Oct 2002, Steve Kargl wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Steve Kargl w rites: root[208] cdcontrol play cdcontrol: no CD device name specified, defaulting to /dev/cd0c cdcontrol: /dev/cd0cc: No such file or directory Why is an extra c appended to cd0c? The first c is