Hello guys,
[Cc-ing the list just for the sake of the archives, so that people could
see what the resolution of the case was.]
Thanks for trying to help me while I was busy sleeping... here I am again.
As suggested, I looked at my fstab, although I do not remember fiddling
with it in a long tim
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Szilveszter Adam writ
es:
>Hello,
>
>On Sat, Apr 07, 2001 at 12:04:07PM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote:
>> I suggest "fsck -d -p" -- the debugging output could prove useful.
>
>Here we go:
Is this with or without the patch I committed earlier today ?
--
Poul-Henning
Hello,
On Sat, Apr 07, 2001 at 12:04:07PM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote:
> I suggest "fsck -d -p" -- the debugging output could prove useful.
Here we go:
pass1
pass1, name /dev/ad0s1a
pass2
pass2, name /dev/ad0s1f
pass2, name /dev/ad0s1g
pass2, name /dev/ad0s1h
pass2, name /dev/ad0s1d
pass2, nam
Hello everybody,
I am sorry to report that the fix committed to preen.c by phk recently did
not fix the problem for me entirely.
I have: ad0 with partitions within s1 a through h (ad0s1a->ad0s1h)
and ad1s1a.
Upon rebooting (after a clean shutdown) with an up-to-date kernel and
userland, all th
>Date: Sat, 07 Apr 2001 09:08:41 +0200
>From: Poul-Henning Kamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Yup, seems like i goofed that patch. Can you try this for me ?
OK; it works much better with the patch: it seems to work correctly,
from what I've tested so far.
[Below is a sketch of what I did, so folks wil
Yup, seems like i goofed that patch. Can you try this for me ?
Index: preen.c
===
RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sbin/fsck/preen.c,v
retrieving revision 1.22
diff -u -r1.22 preen.c
--- preen.c 2001/03/30 08:01:34 1.22
+++ preen.c
OK; I finally got a few consecutive minutes to look over fsck as of
today's -CURRENT.
In replying to different message, I had earlier reported what some others
noted a couple of days ago: that not all of the filesystems are checked
at boot (only 2 are), and experimentation demonstrated that in "
Hello,
On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 10:49:22PM -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> > I've had that problem on one box also -- when the boot occurs, my /var
> > partition is not fsck'd. It's the second pass-two file system, which
> > means that it *should* be checked :-). I suspect a nit in the recent f
* Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010404 22:04] wrote:
>
> I've had that problem on one box also -- when the boot occurs, my /var
> partition is not fsck'd. It's the second pass-two file system, which
> means that it *should* be checked :-). I suspect a nit in the recent fsck
> cleanup, so I
I've had that problem on one box also -- when the boot occurs, my /var
partition is not fsck'd. It's the second pass-two file system, which
means that it *should* be checked :-). I suspect a nit in the recent fsck
cleanup, so I'm CC'ing phk, whose mailbox is obviously too empty.
Robert N M Wat
10 matches
Mail list logo
