Sorry,
>2) log() in rev 1.67 or later
>
> log() ---> the log buffer ONLY
This should be
2) log() in rev 1.67 or later
log() ---> the log buffer ONLY, if a process is reading it
log() ---> /dev/console ONLY, if no process is reading the log buffer
Kazu
To Unsubscribe: sen
>>In rev 1.67 and later, the message goes to the log buffer only if a
>>process is reading the log buffer. If no process is reading, the
>>message goes to the console ONLY, and it is not put into the log
>>buffer. This behavior is inconsistent with the above comment. Is this
>>a bug introduced i
< said:
> Actually, I *desperately* want a way to turn this off.
I agree (somewhat less emphatically) and even filed a PR about a
related issue.
-GAWollman
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Kazutaka Y
OK
> OTA writes:
>
> >In rev 1.67 and later, the message goes to the log buffer only if a
> >process is reading the log buffer. If no process is reading, the
> >message goes to the console ONLY, and it is not put into the l
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Kazutaka YOK
OTA writes:
>In rev 1.67 and later, the message goes to the log buffer only if a
>process is reading the log buffer. If no process is reading, the
>message goes to the console ONLY, and it is not put into the log
>buffer. This behavior is inconsistent
