On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, John Baldwin wrote:
> On 28-Feb-01 Bruce Evans wrote:
> > Most of the pcb actually has the same persistence as the kernel stack
> > (both mainly store the process's context while the process is in the
> > kernel). But it is silly to put the pcb below the stack instead of
> >
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Edwin Culp writes:
: I had that, and many other problems, about a week ago and I am not
: sure but i think that I ended up doing an rm -rf /usr/sys/modules/*
: , cvsuped made world and built new kernel with no problem. I
: remember that I had to erase all the module
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "David O'Brien" writes:
: On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 11:28:37AM -0800, John Baldwin wrote:
: > Have you tried running make depend?
:
: I've got the same problem about a bogus dependancy on machine/lock.h.
: And yes, this is after a `make depend' on a /sys I *just* CVSu
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Leif Neland
writes:
: ===> pecoff
: make: don't know how to make machine/lock.h. Stop
If you are making from pure, clean sources, like I think you said you
were, you may need to rm src/sys/modules/pecoff/.depend.
I had a few of these kicking around and it caused m
On 28-Feb-01 Bruce Evans wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Feb 2001, John Baldwin wrote:
>
>> Ok. It may be that we are overflowing the kernel stack and corrupting the
>> pcb
>> in the process. One idea atm is to move the pcb off of the stack (since it
>> stores persistent data it's a bad place for it anywa
Bruce Evans wrote:
>
> On Tue, 27 Feb 2001, Julian Elischer wrote:
>
> > Bruce Evans wrote:
> > > Most of the pcb actually has the same persistence as the kernel stack
> > > (both mainly store the process's context while the process is in the
> > > kernel). But it is silly to put the pcb below
On Tue, 27 Feb 2001, Julian Elischer wrote:
> Bruce Evans wrote:
> > Most of the pcb actually has the same persistence as the kernel stack
> > (both mainly store the process's context while the process is in the
> > kernel). But it is silly to put the pcb below the stack instead of
> > above it.
Bruce Evans wrote:
>
> On Tue, 27 Feb 2001, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> > Ok. It may be that we are overflowing the kernel stack and corrupting the pcb
> > in the process. One idea atm is to move the pcb off of the stack (since it
> > stores persistent data it's a bad place for it anyways) and to
On Tue, 27 Feb 2001, John Baldwin wrote:
> Ok. It may be that we are overflowing the kernel stack and corrupting the pcb
> in the process. One idea atm is to move the pcb off of the stack (since it
> stores persistent data it's a bad place for it anyways) and to add a red zone
> at the bottom o
On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 11:28:37AM -0800, John Baldwin wrote:
> Have you tried running make depend?
I've got the same problem about a bogus dependancy on machine/lock.h.
And yes, this is after a `make depend' on a /sys I *just* CVSup'ed. :-(
--
-- David ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
GNU is N
I had that, and many other problems, about a week ago and I am not sure but i
think that I ended up doing an rm -rf /usr/sys/modules/* , cvsuped made world
and built new kernel with no problem. I remember that I had to erase all the
modules directory but I'm not comeletely sure that it was this p
On 27-Feb-01 Leif Neland wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 27 Feb 2001, John Baldwin wrote:
>
>>
>> On 27-Feb-01 Leif Neland wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, 27 Feb 2001, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
>> >
>> >> John Baldwin writes:
>> >> >
>> >> > On 27-Feb-01 Leif Neland wrote:
>> >> > > This happens with both
On Tue, 27 Feb 2001, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> On 27-Feb-01 Leif Neland wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 27 Feb 2001, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> >
> >> John Baldwin writes:
> >> >
> >> > On 27-Feb-01 Leif Neland wrote:
> >> > > This happens with both my custom and GENERIC kernel.
> >> > >
> >> > > I
On 27-Feb-01 Leif Neland wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 27 Feb 2001, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
>
>> John Baldwin writes:
>> >
>> > On 27-Feb-01 Leif Neland wrote:
>> > > This happens with both my custom and GENERIC kernel.
>> > >
>> > > It has failed for some days, and also with source cvsup'ed today.
>>
On Tue, 27 Feb 2001, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> John Baldwin writes:
> >
> > On 27-Feb-01 Leif Neland wrote:
> > > This happens with both my custom and GENERIC kernel.
> > >
> > > It has failed for some days, and also with source cvsup'ed today.
> > > A kernel built with "make buildkernel -k" wo
John Baldwin writes:
>
> On 27-Feb-01 Leif Neland wrote:
> > This happens with both my custom and GENERIC kernel.
> >
> > It has failed for some days, and also with source cvsup'ed today.
> > A kernel built with "make buildkernel -k" works...
> >
> > Leif
>
> Have you tried running make depend
On 27-Feb-01 Leif Neland wrote:
> This happens with both my custom and GENERIC kernel.
>
> It has failed for some days, and also with source cvsup'ed today.
> A kernel built with "make buildkernel -k" works...
>
> Leif
Have you tried running make depend?
--
John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
17 matches
Mail list logo
