Re: multiple issues with devstat_*(9)

2011-04-12 Thread Alexander Best
On Mon Apr 11 11, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 13:59:35 +0300, Alexander Motin wrote: > > Alexander Best wrote: > > > On Fri Apr 1 11, John Baldwin wrote: > > >> On Thursday, March 31, 2011 6:33:39 pm Alexander Best wrote: > > >>> i think there are multiple issues with devstat

Re: multiple issues with devstat_*(9)

2011-04-11 Thread Alexander Best
On Mon Apr 11 11, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 23:19:31 +0300, Alexander Motin wrote: > > Alexander Best wrote: > > > On Thu Apr 7 11, Alexander Motin wrote: > > >> Alexander Best wrote: > > >>> On Fri Apr 1 11, John Baldwin wrote: > > On Thursday, March 31, 2011 6:33:39

Re: multiple issues with devstat_*(9)

2011-04-11 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 19:09:00 +0300, Alexander Motin wrote: > On 11.04.2011 18:43, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > >On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 23:19:31 +0300, Alexander Motin wrote: > >>Alexander Best wrote: > >>>2) the pass* devices still don't show up under ide/scsi/other. that's > >>>ok, but > >>>

Re: multiple issues with devstat_*(9)

2011-04-11 Thread Alexander Motin
On 11.04.2011 18:43, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 23:19:31 +0300, Alexander Motin wrote: Alexander Best wrote: 2) the pass* devices still don't show up under ide/scsi/other. that's ok, but then the src comments and manual pages need to be changed accordingly. As I have

Re: multiple issues with devstat_*(9)

2011-04-11 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 23:19:31 +0300, Alexander Motin wrote: > Alexander Best wrote: > > On Thu Apr 7 11, Alexander Motin wrote: > >> Alexander Best wrote: > >>> On Fri Apr 1 11, John Baldwin wrote: > On Thursday, March 31, 2011 6:33:39 pm Alexander Best wrote: > > i think there are mu

Re: multiple issues with devstat_*(9)

2011-04-11 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 13:59:35 +0300, Alexander Motin wrote: > Alexander Best wrote: > > On Fri Apr 1 11, John Baldwin wrote: > >> On Thursday, March 31, 2011 6:33:39 pm Alexander Best wrote: > >>> i think there are multiple issues with devstat. i found the following in > >>> devicestat.h: > >

Re: multiple issues with devstat_*(9)

2011-04-11 Thread Alexander Motin
On 11.04.2011 12:34, Alexander Best wrote: On Mon Apr 11 11, Alexander Motin wrote: Alexander Best wrote: On Mon Apr 11 11, Alexander Motin wrote: Alexander Best wrote: my cd0 is a pata atapi dvdrom drive and i have the following in my kernel conf: device atacore device ahc

Re: multiple issues with devstat_*(9)

2011-04-11 Thread Alexander Best
On Mon Apr 11 11, Alexander Motin wrote: > Alexander Best wrote: > > On Mon Apr 11 11, Alexander Motin wrote: > >> Alexander Best wrote: > >>> my cd0 is a pata atapi dvdrom drive and i have the following in my kernel > >>> conf: > >>> > >>> device atacore > >>> device ahci > >>>

Re: multiple issues with devstat_*(9)

2011-04-11 Thread Alexander Motin
Alexander Best wrote: > On Mon Apr 11 11, Alexander Motin wrote: >> Alexander Best wrote: >>> my cd0 is a pata atapi dvdrom drive and i have the following in my kernel >>> conf: >>> >>> device atacore >>> device ahci >>> device atajmicron >>> device atapci >>> #

Re: multiple issues with devstat_*(9)

2011-04-11 Thread Alexander Best
On Mon Apr 11 11, Alexander Motin wrote: > Alexander Best wrote: > > On Sun Apr 10 11, Alexander Motin wrote: > >> Alexander Best wrote: > >>> On Thu Apr 7 11, Alexander Motin wrote: > Assuming that SCSI and IDE in -t option means transport type, and > assuming that we count everything e

Re: multiple issues with devstat_*(9)

2011-04-10 Thread Alexander Motin
Alexander Best wrote: > On Sun Apr 10 11, Alexander Motin wrote: >> Alexander Best wrote: >>> On Thu Apr 7 11, Alexander Motin wrote: Assuming that SCSI and IDE in -t option means transport type, and assuming that we count everything except ATA and SATA as SCSI, I've made following

Re: multiple issues with devstat_*(9)

2011-04-10 Thread Alexander Best
On Sun Apr 10 11, Alexander Motin wrote: > Alexander Best wrote: > > On Thu Apr 7 11, Alexander Motin wrote: > >> Alexander Best wrote: > >>> On Fri Apr 1 11, John Baldwin wrote: > On Thursday, March 31, 2011 6:33:39 pm Alexander Best wrote: > > i think there are multiple issues with dev

Re: multiple issues with devstat_*(9)

2011-04-10 Thread Alexander Motin
Alexander Best wrote: > On Thu Apr 7 11, Alexander Motin wrote: >> Alexander Best wrote: >>> On Fri Apr 1 11, John Baldwin wrote: On Thursday, March 31, 2011 6:33:39 pm Alexander Best wrote: > i think there are multiple issues with devstat. i found the following in > devicestat.h: >>

Re: multiple issues with devstat_*(9)

2011-04-10 Thread Alexander Best
On Sun Apr 10 11, Alexander Best wrote: > On Thu Apr 7 11, Alexander Motin wrote: > > Alexander Best wrote: > > > On Fri Apr 1 11, John Baldwin wrote: > > >> On Thursday, March 31, 2011 6:33:39 pm Alexander Best wrote: > > >>> i think there are multiple issues with devstat. i found the following

Re: multiple issues with devstat_*(9)

2011-04-10 Thread Alexander Best
On Thu Apr 7 11, Alexander Motin wrote: > Alexander Best wrote: > > On Fri Apr 1 11, John Baldwin wrote: > >> On Thursday, March 31, 2011 6:33:39 pm Alexander Best wrote: > >>> i think there are multiple issues with devstat. i found the following in > >>> devicestat.h: > > ... > > >>> funny thi

Re: multiple issues with devstat_*(9)

2011-04-09 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 08/04/2011 08:51 Andriy Gapon said the following: > on 07/04/2011 13:59 Alexander Motin said the following: >> Any objections? Or SCSI/IDE there expected to mean command set? >> > > Sorry for saying something potentially stupid, but... do we actually have any > reason to make that distinction f

Re: multiple issues with devstat_*(9)

2011-04-07 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 07/04/2011 13:59 Alexander Motin said the following: > Any objections? Or SCSI/IDE there expected to mean command set? > Sorry for saying something potentially stupid, but... do we actually have any reason to make that distinction from any practical point? -- Andriy Gapon ___

Re: multiple issues with devstat_*(9)

2011-04-07 Thread Alexander Motin
Alexander Best wrote: > On Fri Apr 1 11, John Baldwin wrote: >> On Thursday, March 31, 2011 6:33:39 pm Alexander Best wrote: >>> i think there are multiple issues with devstat. i found the following in >>> devicestat.h: ... >>> funny thing is i found the following in scsi_pass.c: >>> >>>

Re: multiple issues with devstat_*(9)

2011-04-06 Thread Alexander Motin
John Baldwin wrote: > On Monday, April 04, 2011 4:43:16 pm Alexander Best wrote: >> On Fri Apr 1 11, John Baldwin wrote: >>> This is probably due to the hard drives being IDE (really ATA) rather than >>> SCSI. I agree this should show the pass devices. >> h...one could argue. the drives are A

Re: multiple issues with devstat_*(9)

2011-04-04 Thread John Baldwin
On Monday, April 04, 2011 4:43:16 pm Alexander Best wrote: > On Fri Apr 1 11, John Baldwin wrote: > > This is probably due to the hard drives being IDE (really ATA) rather than > > SCSI. I agree this should show the pass devices. > > h...one could argue. the drives are ATA, however they are

Re: multiple issues with devstat_*(9)

2011-04-04 Thread Alexander Best
On Fri Apr 1 11, John Baldwin wrote: > On Thursday, March 31, 2011 6:33:39 pm Alexander Best wrote: > > hi there, > > > > i think there are multiple issues with devstat. i found the following in > > devicestat.h: > > > > /* > > * These types are intended to aid statistics gathering/display prog

Re: multiple issues with devstat_*(9)

2011-04-01 Thread John Baldwin
On Thursday, March 31, 2011 6:33:39 pm Alexander Best wrote: > hi there, > > i think there are multiple issues with devstat. i found the following in > devicestat.h: > > /* > * These types are intended to aid statistics gathering/display programs. > * The first 13 types (up to the 'target' flag