Hajimu UMEMOTO schrieb:
>
> Hi,
>
> I wish to obtain number of processes forked since boot from userland.
> So, I made a patch to intend to commit.
> Any comment?
I have done a similar approach. I was inspired by the "vmstat -s" output of
Solaris.
Therefor my solution was integrated into the vmm
On 2001-Jan-15 23:24:22 +0100, Andrzej Bialecki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
...
>> +static unsigned int nforks = 0;
>> +SYSCTL_UINT(_kern, KERN_NFORKS, nforks, CTLFLAG_RD, &nforks, 0, "");
>
>If any, I think this should be long, otherwise on machines like
On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wish to obtain number of processes forked since boot from userland.
> So, I made a patch to intend to commit.
> Any comment?
> Index: sys/kern/kern_fork.c
> diff -u sys/kern/kern_fork.c.orig sys/kern/kern_fork.c
> --- sys/kern/kern_fork.c.o
> On Mon, 15 Jan 2001 21:07:08 +0100 (CET)
> Paul Herman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
pherman> Yes, that's my read from the source. What I also like about it is
pherman> that it counts [vr]forks to boot, plus vmpages affected by the fork.
pherman> After I first saw this in OBSD I was reall
On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
> > On Mon, 15 Jan 2001 19:46:32 +0100 (CET)
> > Paul Herman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> pherman> I like the idea, but this belongs in vmeter with context switches,
> pherman> page faults, etc, doesn't it? This is how OpenBSD does it, anyway.
> On Mon, 15 Jan 2001 19:46:32 +0100 (CET)
> Paul Herman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
pherman> On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
> bright> * Hajimu UMEMOTO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010115 10:00] wrote:
>
> > I wish to obtain number of processes forked since boot from userland.
> > So,
On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
> bright> * Hajimu UMEMOTO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010115 10:00] wrote:
>
> > I wish to obtain number of processes forked since boot from userland.
> > So, I made a patch to intend to commit.
> > Any comment?
I like the idea, but this belongs in vmeter wit
> > I wish to obtain number of processes forked since boot from userland.
>I think dynamic sysctl is useful for dynamic context. But, here is
>just static and it seems there is no advantage. Isn't it?
That sounds to me like a wholly dynamic thing. I mean the amount of forks
since boot can ri
Hi,
> On Mon, 15 Jan 2001 10:06:18 -0800
> Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
bright> * Hajimu UMEMOTO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010115 10:00] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wish to obtain number of processes forked since boot from userland.
> So, I made a patch to intend to commit.
> Any commen
* Hajimu UMEMOTO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010115 10:00] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wish to obtain number of processes forked since boot from userland.
> So, I made a patch to intend to commit.
> Any comment?
Why not just use a dynamic sysctl for this?
--
-Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTE
10 matches
Mail list logo