Re: page fault while in kernel mode: AcpiNsMapHandleToNode + 0x20

2003-09-13 Thread David Wolfskill
>Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 16:26:58 -0700 (PDT) >From: Nate Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: David Wolfskill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: page fault while in kernel mode: AcpiNsMapHandleToNode + 0x20 >Your backtrace shows that your acpi_tz_

Re: page fault while in kernel mode: AcpiNsMapHandleToNode + 0x20

2003-09-13 Thread Nate Lawson
Your backtrace shows that your acpi_tz_monitor() thread is hitting an invalid pointer. It would be interesting to see what package that is (i.e. the _ALx values). Please send a URL to the output of: acpidump -t -d -o david.dsdt > david.asl -Nate ___

Re: page fault while in kernel mode, cam related ?

2002-09-19 Thread Justin T. Gibbs
>> Can you do a: >> >> cd /usr/src/sys/i386/compile/MYKERNEL >> gdb -k kernel.debug >> l *(ahc_dump_card_state+0x692) >> >> and give me the output. >> > > I'm sorry but i replaced the hd and as it survided the buildworld > discarded the old one. I still have the compile-director

Re: page fault while in kernel mode, cam related ?

2002-09-19 Thread marius
On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 04:31:26PM -0600, Justin T. Gibbs wrote: > > > > uhm, i just got another one. i guess the hd is broken and also managed to > > cause the previous panic. > > Can you do a: > > cd /usr/src/sys/i386/compile/MYKERNEL > gdb -k kernel.debug > l *(ahc_dump_car

Re: page fault while in kernel mode, cam related ?

2002-09-19 Thread Justin T. Gibbs
> > uhm, i just got another one. i guess the hd is broken and also managed to > cause the previous panic. Can you do a: cd /usr/src/sys/i386/compile/MYKERNEL gdb -k kernel.debug l *(ahc_dump_card_state+0x692) and give me the output. Thanks, Justin To Unsubscribe: send

Re: page fault while in kernel mode, cam related ?

2002-09-18 Thread Bruce Evans
On Wed, 18 Sep 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > btw, this box is connected via a serial console at 9600 bps and while typing > at the ddb-prompt it swallowed most characters, i.e. i had to type single > characters up to four times. That and the "Context switches not allowed in the debugger." mess

Re: page fault while in kernel mode, cam related ?

2002-09-17 Thread marius
uhm, i just got another one. i guess the hd is broken and also managed to cause the previous panic. (da0:ahc0:0:0:0): SCB 0x27 - timed out ahc_pci0: Dumping Card State while idle, at SEQADDR 0x8 ACCUM = 0x47, SINDEX = 0x9e, DINDE

Re: page fault while in kernel mode, cam related ?

2002-09-17 Thread marius
On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 07:03:22PM -0600, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 02:53:49 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > hi > > > > while trying to upgrade a -current box with an older scsi hd a scsi error > > seemed to have triggered a panic (actually the first ever on that

Re: page fault while in kernel mode, cam related ?

2002-09-17 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 19:03:22 -0600, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 02:53:49 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > hi > > > > while trying to upgrade a -current box with an older scsi hd a scsi error > > seemed to have triggered a panic (actually the first ever on that bo

Re: page fault while in kernel mode, cam related ?

2002-09-17 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 02:53:49 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > hi > > while trying to upgrade a -current box with an older scsi hd a scsi error > seemed to have triggered a panic (actually the first ever on that box): > > (da0:ahc0:0:0:0): READ(10). CDB: 28 0 0 4b 94 df 0 0 20 0 > (da0:ah

Re: page fault while in kernel mode

2000-10-05 Thread Bosko Milekic
Hi Michael, Do you think you can provide us with a stack trace, at the least? This would deffinately give us something more to work with. Unfortunately, with this information, it's very difficult to pin-point the problem, as we're not certain as to what is at 0xc029e6cb, exactly.

Re: page fault while in kernel mode

2000-10-03 Thread Michael Harnois
On Tue, 03 Oct 2000 19:33:01 -0400 (EDT), Bosko Milekic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Also, is there anything particular that you > notice that is happening in parallel to this? Anything special > you're doing? I can tell you now that rolling back to PRE_SMPNG makes the problem go awa