Re: panic: bdwrite: buffer is not busy

2002-07-16 Thread Munish Chopra
After rebuilding world/kernel/debug today I get some better info (I fear my debug kernel was out of synch with my running kernel before, but because of my inexperience with debugging I didn't figure that out right away): GNU gdb 5.2.0 (FreeBSD) 20020627 Copyright 2002 Free Software Foundation, I

Re: panic: bdwrite: buffer is not busy

2002-07-15 Thread Munish Chopra
Third one: GNU gdb 5.2.0 (FreeBSD) 20020627 Copyright 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions. Type "show copying" to see the conditions. There is

Re: panic: bdwrite: buffer is not busy

2002-07-15 Thread Munish Chopra
And another one comes along: GNU gdb 5.2.0 (FreeBSD) 20020627 Copyright 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions. Type "show copying" to see the con

Re: panic: bdwrite: buffer is not busy

2002-02-11 Thread Bruce Evans
On Sun, 10 Feb 2002, Mikhail Teterin wrote: > On 10 Feb, Bruce Evans wrote: > > This is a well known bug in the device layer. I reported it on > > 2001/12/26 and fixed it locally a little later. See the thread in > > -current about "panic during fdisk'ing a md(4) device" for patches.

Re: panic: bdwrite: buffer is not busy

2002-02-11 Thread Mikhail Teterin
On 10 Feb, Bruce Evans wrote: > On Sat, 9 Feb 2002, John Baldwin wrote: > >> On 09-Feb-02 Mikhail Teterin wrote: >> > While attempting to ``fdisk fd0.1440''. Or ``fdisk fd0''. Or >> > ``newfs_msdos fd0.1440'' with or without the floppy inside :-\ With >> > todays or Jan 3rd kernel (my prev

Re: panic: bdwrite: buffer is not busy

2002-02-11 Thread Bruce Evans
On Sun, 10 Feb 2002, Mikhail Teterin wrote: > On 10 Feb, Bruce Evans wrote: > > This is a well known bug in the device layer. I reported it on > > 2001/12/26 and fixed it locally a little later. See the thread in > > -current about "panic during fdisk'ing a md(4) device" for patches.

Re: panic: bdwrite: buffer is not busy

2002-02-10 Thread Bruce Evans
On Sun, 10 Feb 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bruce Evans writes: > >On Sat, 9 Feb 2002, Julian Elischer wrote: > > > >> On Sun, 10 Feb 2002, Bruce Evans wrote: > >> > > >> > This is a well known bug in the device layer. I reported it on 2001/12/26 > >> > and fi

Re: panic: bdwrite: buffer is not busy

2002-02-10 Thread Mikhail Teterin
On 10 Feb, Bruce Evans wrote: > On Sat, 9 Feb 2002, John Baldwin wrote: > >> On 09-Feb-02 Mikhail Teterin wrote: >> > While attempting to ``fdisk fd0.1440''. Or ``fdisk fd0''. Or >> > ``newfs_msdos fd0.1440'' with or without the floppy inside :-\ With >> > todays or Jan 3rd kernel (my prev

Re: panic: bdwrite: buffer is not busy

2002-02-09 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bruce Evans writes: >On Sat, 9 Feb 2002, Julian Elischer wrote: > >> On Sun, 10 Feb 2002, Bruce Evans wrote: >> >> > >> > This is a well known bug in the device layer. I reported it on 2001/12/26 >> > and fixed it locally a little later. See the thread in -current

RE: panic: bdwrite: buffer is not busy

2002-02-09 Thread Bruce Evans
On Sat, 9 Feb 2002, Julian Elischer wrote: > On Sun, 10 Feb 2002, Bruce Evans wrote: > > > > > This is a well known bug in the device layer. I reported it on 2001/12/26 > > and fixed it locally a little later. See the thread in -current about > > "panic during fdisk'ing a md(4) device" for patc

RE: panic: bdwrite: buffer is not busy

2002-02-09 Thread Julian Elischer
On Sun, 10 Feb 2002, Bruce Evans wrote: > > This is a well known bug in the device layer. I reported it on 2001/12/26 > and fixed it locally a little later. See the thread in -current about > "panic during fdisk'ing a md(4) device" for patches. > Can you commit the fix? To Unsubscribe: s

RE: panic: bdwrite: buffer is not busy

2002-02-09 Thread Bruce Evans
On Sat, 9 Feb 2002, John Baldwin wrote: > On 09-Feb-02 Mikhail Teterin wrote: > > While attempting to ``fdisk fd0.1440''. Or ``fdisk fd0''. Or > > ``newfs_msdos fd0.1440'' with or without the floppy inside :-\ > > With todays or Jan 3rd kernel (my previous upgrade). > > Only use fdisk on hard dis

RE: panic: bdwrite: buffer is not busy

2002-02-09 Thread John Baldwin
On 09-Feb-02 Mikhail Teterin wrote: > While attempting to ``fdisk fd0.1440''. Or ``fdisk fd0''. Or > ``newfs_msdos fd0.1440'' with or without the floppy inside :-\ > With todays or Jan 3rd kernel (my previous upgrade). Only use fdisk on hard disks. Still it shouldn't panic. The bdwrite is just