* From: Bruce Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* The correct answer seems to be "you can't do that" :-). Even checking
Err. Now why am I not surprised that you said that? ;)
Anyway, I have committed the following patch submitted by Alexander
Langer. It has a nice feature of working for both
On 24 Jan 2000, Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami wrote:
Anyway, I have committed the following patch submitted by Alexander
Langer. It has a nice feature of working for both -current and
-stable without any additional #ifdef's. I hope it's ok.
Satoshi
===
---
Thus spake Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Langer. It has a nice feature of working for both -current and
-stable without any additional #ifdef's. I hope it's ok.
I now saw Garret Wollman's function.
I like the use of the static-vars.
The use of sigemptyset makes it
On Wed, 19 Jan 2000, Garrett Wollman wrote:
On Wed, 19 Jan 2000 07:03:04 -0800 (PST), [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Satoshi Asami)
said:
How do I test if sigset_t is empty in -current? The xview sources
have this macro:
int
sigisempty(sigset_t *my_sigset)
{
static sigset_t empty_ss;
On Wed, Jan 19, 2000 at 07:03:04AM -0800, Satoshi Asami wrote:
How do I test if sigset_t is empty in -current? The xview sources
have this macro:
#define sigisempty(s) (!(*(s)))
which is ok for the old sigset_t (unsigned int) but obviously won't
work for the new one since it's a
