Re: sudo busted after recent upgrade to -current

2002-01-14 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : Sheesh, ok. :) I had a problem with sudo a while back due to pam not falling : back to other in pam.conf properly when the pam.d dir existed. Have you tried : copying /etc/pam.d/other to /etc/pam.d/sudo? No.

Re: sudo busted after recent upgrade to -current

2002-01-14 Thread Michael Reifenberger
On Mon, 14 Jan 2002, John Baldwin wrote: ... > Sheesh, ok. :) I had a problem with sudo a while back due to pam not falling > back to other in pam.conf properly when the pam.d dir existed. Have you tried > copying /etc/pam.d/other to /etc/pam.d/sudo? I see this too when I do `su - pgsql`. I have

Re: sudo busted after recent upgrade to -current

2002-01-14 Thread John Baldwin
On 14-Jan-02 M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >: >: On 14-Jan-02 M. Warner Losh wrote: >: > OK. I did a make buildworld/installworld. I did a mergemaster and >: > made sure that /etc/pam.d was there. I also rebuilt

Re: sudo busted after recent upgrade to -current

2002-01-14 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : : On 14-Jan-02 M. Warner Losh wrote: : > OK. I did a make buildworld/installworld. I did a mergemaster and : > made sure that /etc/pam.d was there. I also rebuilt sudo 1.6.4 via : > the ports system (I chang

RE: sudo busted after recent upgrade to -current

2002-01-14 Thread John Baldwin
On 14-Jan-02 M. Warner Losh wrote: > OK. I did a make buildworld/installworld. I did a mergemaster and > made sure that /etc/pam.d was there. I also rebuilt sudo 1.6.4 via > the ports system (I changed the version number there from the old one > to this). However, now when I type sudo it says