> On Sat, Jan 20, 2001 at 11:24:16AM +0200, Mark Murray wrote:
> > I don't agree with this change.
> >
> > hostname != name-that-IP-address-resolves-to.
>
> Dunno what you are talking about. That has nothing directly to do with
> this. No one is talking about forcing you to change your hostname.
On Sat, Jan 20, 2001 at 11:24:16AM +0200, Mark Murray wrote:
> I don't agree with this change.
>
> hostname != name-that-IP-address-resolves-to.
Dunno what you are talking about. That has nothing directly to do with
this. No one is talking about forcing you to change your hostname. The
patch jus
I don't agree with this change.
hostname != name-that-IP-address-resolves-to.
I can see how loggin the IP address (or some manifestation thereof) to
a central logger, but this is too strong.
Example: My laptop has a hostname set for my home network, and I connect
it to my work network and DHCP
