On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 03:18:10AM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPUCPU COMMAND
> 824 root -80 1048K 596K biord 0 0:38 0.00% 0.00% find
> 385 root 40 32740K 31944K select 1 0:32 0.00% 0.00% XFree86
On 27-Mar-01 David Wolfskill wrote:
>>Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 11:56:38 -0800 (PST)
>>From: John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>>> OK; that's a good & useful thing to keep in mind. And I did see some
>>> IRQ-related entries in top's output.
>
>>Are they getting %CPU though. When running top -S,
>Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 11:56:38 -0800 (PST)
>From: John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> OK; that's a good & useful thing to keep in mind. And I did see some
>> IRQ-related entries in top's output.
>Are they getting %CPU though. When running top -S, the CPU %'s should always
>add up to about 10
On 27-Mar-01 David Wolfskill wrote:
>>Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 10:21:45 -0800 (PST)
>>From: John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>>Keep in mind that we no longer charge interrupt time to the process being
>>interrupted, instead all that interrupt handling has been pushed off into
>>ithreads. Same f
Also, I happened to note that as I'm doing a "make buildworld" (for today's
-STABLE, running in yesterday's -STABLE), my "top -S" output shows a
large number of "0.00" entries for CPU (on the same laptop as my
previously-reported results). So it may be odd, but at least -- in my
case -- it appear
* John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010327 08:33] wrote:
>
> On 27-Mar-01 Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> >
> > PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPUCPU COMMAND
> > 824 root -80 1048K 596K biord 0 0:38 0.00% 0.00% find
> > 385 root 40 32740K 31
>Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 10:21:46 -0800 (PST)
>From: John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Hmm... mine loks like that (modulo #CPUs), except when I'm actually
>> making it do some work (re-building the kernel, in this case). What I
>> see ("top -S") looks like:
>> last pid: 9546; load averages:
On 27-Mar-01 David Wolfskill wrote:
>>Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 03:18:10 -0800
>>From: Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
>> PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPUCPU COMMAND
>> 824 root -80 1048K 596K biord 0 0:38 0.00% 0.00% find
>> 385 root
On 27-Mar-01 David Wolfskill wrote:
>>Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 08:33:10 -0800 (PST)
>>From: John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>>Not one that I've seen:
>
>> PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPUCPU COMMAND
>> 11 root -160 0K 0K CPU0 0 79.5H 49.37% 4
>Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 08:33:10 -0800 (PST)
>From: John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Not one that I've seen:
> PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPUCPU COMMAND
> 11 root -160 0K 0K CPU0 0 79.5H 49.37% 49.37% idle: cpu0
> 10 root -160
On 27-Mar-01 Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>
> PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPUCPU COMMAND
> 824 root -80 1048K 596K biord 0 0:38 0.00% 0.00% find
> 385 root 40 32740K 31944K select 1 0:32 0.00% 0.00% XFree86
> 836 root -80
>Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 03:18:10 -0800
>From: Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPUCPU COMMAND
> 824 root -80 1048K 596K biord 0 0:38 0.00% 0.00% find
> 385 root 40 32740K 31944K select 1 0:32 0.00%
12 matches
Mail list logo