[moved to -chat, since it has nothing to do with -current]
On Mon, 08 Oct 2001 11:09:06 -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> > > Sourceforge is based on the premise that you can create an
> > > Open Source project by declaring one, which is untrue. If
> > > you want my opnions in
Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> > Sourceforge is based on the premise that you can create an
> > Open Source project by declaring one, which is untrue. If
> > you want my opnions in detail, check the -chat and -advocacy
> > archives.
>
> I am not sure how this could defeat the fact that you can get a nec
Terry Lambert wrote:
> Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> > I agree with Kris. These days it is not a big problem, especially for
> > an opensource project, such as UUCP. Most obvious possibility is a
> > Sourceforge - it provides all what is necessary (i.e. cvs repo, bug
> > tracking database, mailing lists
Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> I agree with Kris. These days it is not a big problem, especially for
> an opensource project, such as UUCP. Most obvious possibility is a
> Sourceforge - it provides all what is necessary (i.e. cvs repo, bug
> tracking database, mailing lists, www space, ftp space etc) at z
