Soren!
I bet someone else already mentioned your commit broke Alpha kernels.
Index: fd.c
===
RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/isa/fd.c,v
retrieving revision 1.223
diff -u -p -r1.223 fd.c
--- fd.c2001/12/16 05:37:22 1.223
On 18-Dec-01 Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
Soren!
I bet someone else already mentioned your commit broke Alpha kernels.
Søren didn't commit this, adn there has already been a discussion on this list
about it as it broke all non-i386 kernels.
--
John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Dec 18, 2001 at 10:35:39AM -0800, John Baldwin wrote:
On 18-Dec-01 Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
Soren!
I bet someone else already mentioned your commit broke Alpha kernels.
S?ren didn't commit this, adn there has already been a discussion on this list
about it as it broke all
On Tue, Dec 18, 2001 at 08:09:18PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
s/Soren/Joerg/
And yes, he knows about it.
Wilko
Soren!
I bet someone else already mentioned your commit broke Alpha kernels.
Index: fd.c
===
RCS file:
Ruslan Ermilov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oops sorry, that was Joerg.
It's fixed now, although i'm still not convinces that using __i386__
is the right thing. If our machine/param.h defines several
constants for _MACHINE_ARCH, they should all be distint for the
various machines. As it seems
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Joerg Wunsch writes:
: Cc goes to [EMAIL PROTECTED]: what is the politically correct way to
: distinguish a PC-type architecture (in that case one that uses a
: PC-style RTC memory to store configuration information) from another
: architecture that uses IA32 CPUs
