Robert Watson wrote:
>
> Sounds good to me, as long as it runs :-).
>
> BTW, ran into another nit from the 02/13 snapshot. I installed the
> X-kern-developer distribution, discovered X11 didn't work, so went back
> into sysinstall to install X11 stuff. I selected some combination of X11
> comp
On Tue, 14 Mar 2000, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
> I was actually talking about FreeBSD 4.0, not XFree86 4.0. :)
D'oh!
--
"Welcome to the desert of the real."
- Laurence Fishburne as Morpheus, "The Matrix"
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-
I was actually talking about FreeBSD 4.0, not XFree86 4.0. :)
> On Tue, 14 Mar 2000, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
>
> > I think I'm just going to go to the 3.4 bits; I don't have a definitive
> > XFree86 distribution for 4.0 and I don't think I'm going to get one in
> > time to make a difference.
>
On Tue, 14 Mar 2000, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
> I think I'm just going to go to the 3.4 bits; I don't have a definitive
> XFree86 distribution for 4.0 and I don't think I'm going to get one in
> time to make a difference.
Not to mention that 4.0 has "issues" with some
hardware/software/e
Sounds good to me, as long as it runs :-).
BTW, ran into another nit from the 02/13 snapshot. I installed the
X-kern-developer distribution, discovered X11 didn't work, so went back
into sysinstall to install X11 stuff. I selected some combination of X11
components, and chose releng3.freebsd.o
I think I'm just going to go to the 3.4 bits; I don't have a definitive
XFree86 distribution for 4.0 and I don't think I'm going to get one in
time to make a difference.
- Jordan
>
> It looks like the X11 associated with the snapshots on current.freebsd.org
> is still broken:
>
> /usr/libexe
It looks like the X11 associated with the snapshots on current.freebsd.org
is still broken:
/usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Share object "libXThrStub.so.6" not found
Installing -current boxes for testing and development would be a lot
easier if this worked. :-) Especially leading up to releases wh
