On Sun, Jun 03, 2001 at 05:16:41PM +0100, Ian Dowse wrote:
> One final annoyance is that using an alternate superblock will undo
> any changes made by tunefs, unless the '-A' flag had been used with
> tunefs originally. Typically this will result in soft-updates
> getting disabled.
Maybe -A shou
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Alfred Perlstein wri
tes:
>> Was it determined that the fsck corruption problems which were seen
>> with fsck after the introduction of the dirpref changes do not affect
>> RELENG_4? I haven't seen any MFC of changes to the RELENG_4 fsck
>> code, and I'm kind of wo
* Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010602 18:46] wrote:
> Was it determined that the fsck corruption problems which were seen
> with fsck after the introduction of the dirpref changes do not affect
> RELENG_4? I haven't seen any MFC of changes to the RELENG_4 fsck
> code, and I'm kind of worrie
Was it determined that the fsck corruption problems which were seen
with fsck after the introduction of the dirpref changes do not affect
RELENG_4? I haven't seen any MFC of changes to the RELENG_4 fsck
code, and I'm kind of worried now that I've reverted my current system
back to RELENG_4 :-)
K
