On Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 08:37:35PM +0200, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> Any updates? My quick test involving running pkg_version on a system with 92
> installed ports, which is very make-intensive operation if ports have origin
> recorded, as pkg_version(1) runs `make -V' for each port, shown that
> stat
:> Any updates? My quick test involving running pkg_version on a system with 92
:> installed ports, which is very make-intensive operation if ports have origin
:> recorded, as pkg_version(1) runs `make -V' for each port, shown that
:> statically-compiled make is about 15% faster than dynamically-
>
> Any updates? My quick test involving running pkg_version on a system with 92
> installed ports, which is very make-intensive operation if ports have origin
> recorded, as pkg_version(1) runs `make -V' for each port, shown that
> statically-compiled make is about 15% faster than dynamically-co
Will Andrews wrote:
> [ cc's trimmed, moved to -current ]
>
> On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 09:51:08AM -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
> > So long as it is not forced unconditionally to be static.
>
> I agree.
>
> > b) I've not seen the numbers for this. If it is only 1% faster, it
> > doesn't make sense,
