On 24/02/2014 15:40, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message <530b666a.1000...@rewt.org.uk>, Joe Holden writes:
Please check how NTP is authenticated before giving bad advice,
it's all in the RFC.
v3 or v4? It is an optional part of the spec in both cases and again
isn't required for 99% of peopl
In message <530b666a.1000...@rewt.org.uk>, Joe Holden writes:
>> Please check how NTP is authenticated before giving bad advice,
>> it's all in the RFC.
>>
>v3 or v4? It is an optional part of the spec in both cases and again
>isn't required for 99% of people using ntpd as a client, which was the
On 24/02/2014 13:52, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message <530b2dee.3030...@rewt.org.uk>, Joe Holden writes:
The other point I should make here is that if you care that much about
time security you shouldn't be contacting ntp servers over 3rd party
networks anyway, at least not without some IP-l
In message <530b2dee.3030...@rewt.org.uk>, Joe Holden writes:
>The other point I should make here is that if you care that much about
>time security you shouldn't be contacting ntp servers over 3rd party
>networks anyway, at least not without some IP-level
>encryption/authentication, or use a s
On 24/02/2014 11:26, Joe Holden wrote:
On 24/02/2014 11:18, Ollivier Robert wrote:
According to Joe Holden on Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 11:13:23AM +:
hm, I can't say I have noticed this as being a problem where I've
used it, are there any scenarios where this is a showstopper?
Non-support for
On 24/02/2014 11:18, Ollivier Robert wrote:
According to Joe Holden on Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 11:13:23AM +:
hm, I can't say I have noticed this as being a problem where I've
used it, are there any scenarios where this is a showstopper?
Non-support for auth is a concern, lack of NTPv4 protoco
According to Joe Holden on Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 11:13:23AM +:
> hm, I can't say I have noticed this as being a problem where I've
> used it, are there any scenarios where this is a showstopper?
Non-support for auth is a concern, lack of NTPv4 protocol support is another.
Base ntpd also inclu
