:Will you be assigning the copyright to the FSF? (ie: you'll never be able
:to change your mind? 50 years is a long time...)
70 now I believe. Changed to be compatible with the euros, who are all 70
years apparently.
If I understand things correctly, there will soon be
Julian Elischer scribbled this message on Sep 20:
POLA! if we have persisten permissions and ownership, and we allow
renaming, then renaming should also be persistant... after the mount
again, da0c either no longer exists, or is no longer ttyd1... which
neither is an acceptable
Hello,
Last night I worked to port some code to FreeBSD 3.2 Stable.
I was curious about one fact: on netinet/in.h there is no any in6_addr
support for IPv6. Am I wrong ? FreeBSD does not support IPv6 ?
Regards,
Stef
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe
well, i hate to tell ya, no, currently FBSD does not support IPv6/IPng.
but, there are a couple packages where you can get it to support it.
do a search for KAME, and download that.
now, as to why it's not rolled in already?
my guess is that it's due to IPng/IPv6 still being under
Hi,
Well, on Linux 2.2 IPv6/IPng it is already supported. I don't remember
exactly starting with what version of Linux they have already support
IPv6 but for instance BSDI also is supporting.
So I think we must support quite soon IPv6/IPng for a lot of
Client-Server application which will gonna
Well and more details from mailing list is that there is no "standard"
for IPv6 yet.
Somebody could explain a little bit here what really means this when
DEC, HP they have already on the TCP stack the newest IP ?
Stef
stefan parvu wrote:
Hello,
Last night I worked to port some code to
Hi list,
My problem is solved. Since I changed my SCSI to a Quantum, I haven't have
more problem with performance.
I recompiled the pwd_mkdb.c program using more RAM memory and the
performance became better. Before compilation the "delete user" operation
takes 3 minutes, and now the same
Matthew Dillon wrote:
I think devfs is really cool. I don't think it needs to have
fancy persistence in order to be useful.
Likewise. I find myself never needing to change device permissions.
I do wish however that there were some sort of "template" options for
classes of names.
"Daniel C. Sobral" wrote:
Jamie Bowden wrote:
On Sun, 19 Sep 1999, Peter Wemm wrote:
:Will you be assigning the copyright to the FSF? (ie: you'll never be able
:to change your mind? 50 years is a long time...)
70 now I believe. Changed to be compatible with the euros, who are
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Soren Schmidt
Sent: Tuesday, 21 September 1999 4:30
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: 'Ward R Goodwin'; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Help - Fasttrak eide raid host adapter and FreeBSD
It
__
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Mats Lofkvist wrote:
But bugfixes and/or developments needed by the core FreeBSD tools
will have to be done on the BSD licensed version of global
(since the core system isn't supposed to depend on ports),
isn't this going to lead to the split of the global development
in two?
You are right.
Peter Wemm wrote:
Will you be assigning the copyright to the FSF? (ie: you'll never be able
to change your mind? 50 years is a long time...)
I will keep the right.
Thank you for your advice.
--
Shigio Yamaguchi - Tama Communications Corporation
Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED], WWW:
Hi,
I have a couple of questions about the way 'out of swap' situations are
handled in FreeBSD. Not that my system often runs out of swap, I'm just
being curious:
When the system runs out of swap space, it is supposed to kill the
'biggest' process to regain some space.
I wrote a little
On Tue, 21 Sep 1999, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
Julian Elischer scribbled this message on Sep 20:
POLA! if we have persisten permissions and ownership, and we allow
renaming, then renaming should also be persistant... after the mount
again, da0c either no longer exists, or is no longer
Well, I tried -questions, and met with a resounding silence. jkh tells me
that you folks here are the only ones with the expertise to answer this
sort of question, so here you go.
I'm preparing a series of articles on FreeBSD's sysctl interface -- not
the inner workings, merely "What is sysctl,
On Mon, 20 Sep 1999, Julian Elischer wrote:
POLA! if we have persisten permissions and ownership, and we allow
renaming, then renaming should also be persistant... after the mount
again, da0c either no longer exists, or is no longer ttyd1... which
neither is an acceptable solution...
On Tue, 21 Sep 1999, Peter Wemm wrote:
Matthew Dillon wrote:
I think devfs is really cool. I don't think it needs to have
fancy persistence in order to be useful.
Likewise. I find myself never needing to change device permissions.
I often change perms on the bpf device so that
The mount_nfs manual says I can use -o port=port_number to specify
a port number for NFS requests. Which port number should I use: the port
number of the portmapper (111), the port number of the mountd daemon, or
the port number of the nfsd daemon? I also suppose I can use the
following
:where SIZE was 4 MB in this case. I ran it on the console (I've got 64 MB
:of RAM and 128 MB of swap) until the swap pager went out of space and
:my huge process was eventually killed as expected. Fine. But when I ran
:it under X Window, the system eventually killed the X server (SIZE ~20 MB,
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tony Finch writes:
: Why not just do a one-off checkpoint at shutdown time? Why do you need
: to track the changes as they happen?
Power failures.
Also, if the device is new, it might be nice to have commands that run
when they arrive in the tree (think pccard).
Can everybody please remember that the argument about whether persistence
is good, or the devil's invention, has already been totally beaten to
death, and it's in the mail archives.
Most of you have been working towards defining an acceptable compromise,
but if your post gives your opinion about
We have a number of solaris 2.78 machines (I am in the process of installing
them now), and I notice that if I ls a directory that is mounted NFSv3/UDP from
a FreeBSD server to a Solaris 2.7 client there are a number of files that
show up missing. This is most intreaging with a large
On Tue, 21 Sep 1999, Ben Rosengart wrote:
On Tue, 21 Sep 1999, Peter Wemm wrote:
Matthew Dillon wrote:
I think devfs is really cool. I don't think it needs to have
fancy persistence in order to be useful.
Likewise. I find myself never needing to change device
He everyone,
PCweek is sponsoring another hacking contest against Linux and WinNT.
Here is the URL:
http://www.hackpcweek.com/
They have a post area and I have made the suggestion that they test
freebsd against these two os's and see how we fair. I have to say the
freebsd is by far a much
On Mon, 20 Sep 1999, Johan Kruger wrote:
I've been playing with picobsd ( the router option ) and have been
adding stuff to crunch - no problem, untile i wanted to add pkg_add to
crunch. The problem is is that libinstall.a uses cleanup that is defined
elsewhere. I get the following : look at
On Mon, 20 Sep 1999, Douglas Pokorny wrote:
A few days ago I was at Office Max and bought an InterAct "Web.Remote
professional". For those of you who don't know, its an infrared
remote control which contains a trackball, two trackball buttons, and
an 18-key keypad. It was a pretty good
On Tue, 21 Sep 1999, Zhihui Zhang wrote:
The mount_nfs manual says I can use -o port=port_number to specify
a port number for NFS requests. Which port number should I use: the port
number of the portmapper (111), the port number of the mountd daemon, or
the port number of the nfsd
I was wondering if anybody was currently working on support for any Mylex
RAID controllers. We're unfortunately a generation behind on the DPTs and
particular vendor that I work with only sells Mylex with their machines.
I'm working on it at the moment. It doesn't help that Mylex have
Devices must failsafe from a security point of view in the absense of
a devfsd. Otherwise there will extreme opposition from the security
officer. This means 0600 or more restrictive permissions. While it
doesn't happen often, it must be designed for. Otherwise you've
replaced a secure,
stefan parvu wrote:
Well and more details from mailing list is that there is no "standard"
for IPv6 yet.
Somebody could explain a little bit here what really means this when
DEC, HP they have already on the TCP stack the newest IP ?
Search for ipv6 in the FreeBSD mailing list archives at
Hi,
I'm using one atapi-cdrw (CREATIVE CD-RW RW4224E/1.36) and works fine but
I don't know change speed to 4x, now I'm burning at double speed (I'm
spending 37min to burn one full cd). I've got other unit (YAMAHA-SCSI)
which spends 17min for a full cd but using cdrecord speed=4.
Are there any
Tradition counts. GLOBAL isn't quite sendmail.
On the other hand, sendmail is easier to extract and isolate (there are
no sendmail-specific patches to nvi, for example), and there are several
alternative packages (postfix, exim, qmail, smail, etc) that one might
want to *replace* sendmail with
Hi all,
I'm stuck trying to figure out an amd.map to invoke
/sbin/mount_null by hand, (no problem with the normal nfs).
I have a bunch of machines that use AMD to access one large pseudo-common tree
containing, to give a simplified example:
/usr/public/3.2/src -- /host/flip/usr/src
On Tue, 21 Sep 1999 10:17:26 -0400 (EDT), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've always had the impression that the sysctls available on a system are
dependent on the kernel configuration, but have never been able to verify
this.
This is true. They also depend on the KLDs (a KLD can add new sysctl
On Tue, 21 Sep 1999, Zhihui Zhang wrote:
On Tue, 21 Sep 1999, Zhihui Zhang wrote:
The mount_nfs manual says I can use -o port=port_number to specify
a port number for NFS requests. Which port number should I use: the port
number of the portmapper (111), the port number of the
Hi,
I'm doing TCP development on a custom operating system that I've
written and am using my FreeBSD box for testing my TCP stack. I'm in
the early stages right now and I have a lot of bugs. One of my bugs
is that I shut down a connection on my end but I'm doing something
wrong and the
According to stefan parvu:
I was curious about one fact: on netinet/in.h there is no any in6_addr
support for IPv6. Am I wrong ? FreeBSD does not support IPv6 ?
Our Japanese friends are working to integrate IPv6 into current. For -STABLE,
you have at least 3 implementations that works fairly
On Wed, 22 Sep 1999, Ollivier Robert wrote:
NetBSD OpenBSD has decided to use one of the last two for themselves
(although I always forgot who took what -- I think NetBSD took INRIA and
OpenBSD NRL but I could be wrong).
FWIW, the KAME implementation was integrated into NetBSD-current
Warner Losh wrote:
Devices must failsafe from a security point of view in the absense of
a devfsd. Otherwise there will extreme opposition from the security
officer. This means 0600 or more restrictive permissions. While it
doesn't happen often, it must be designed for. Otherwise you've
Pedro Fernando Giffuni wrote:
Yes, I know that gawk is faster, but isn't nawk the one true (new) awk?
From my experience, the awk downloadable from Kernighan's web page
(should be "nawk", shouldn't it?) is a little bit faster on average
than gawk. Probably not much that it would really matter
:Hi,
:
:I'm doing TCP development on a custom operating system that I've
:written and am using my FreeBSD box for testing my TCP stack. I'm in
:the early stages right now and I have a lot of bugs. One of my bugs
:is that I shut down a connection on my end but I'm doing something
:wrong and the
A few days ago I was at Office Max and bought an InterAct "Web.Remote
professional". For those of you who don't know, its an infrared
remote control which contains a trackball, two trackball buttons, and
an 18-key keypad. It was a pretty good deal for $17US.
My ultimate goal is to use it to
The three of them are on the ports tree. mawk and gawk are GPL'd, nawk
is not.
I'm not sure if nawk is fully POSIX compliant but it is the "new" awk
described in Kernighans' book.
Yes mawk is the fastest of the three, but I'm not sure if speed is the
most important feature in a scripting
:Does anyone know how I can manually shutdown the above connection on
:'vger' short of waiting a really long time or rebooting?
:
:Thanks,
:-Brian
:--
:Brian Dean [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Turn on keepalives and set the parameters really low so the connection
times
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wes Peters writes:
: Is there any possibility of creating a database of devfs perms that gets
: loaded into kernel-accessible data space by the loader before boot? Once
: the system is up, devfsd could take over, monitoring and updating the
: state of devfs and this
"David E. Cross" wrote:
Count me as one of the ones who do not accept this answer. I realize that
It was not the "answer" which was not accepted. Someone actually
argued it could not be an NFS protocol bug because the Solaris stack
was the reference implementation, ergo it does not have
According to Andy Doran:
FWIW, the KAME implementation was integrated into NetBSD-current around
the start of July.
Thanks for the correction ! Nice to ehar that.
--
Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! -=- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeBSD keltia.freenix.fr 4.0-CURRENT #74: Thu Sep 9
stefan parvu wrote:
Hello,
Last night I worked to port some code to FreeBSD 3.2 Stable.
I was curious about one fact: on netinet/in.h there is no any in6_addr
support for IPv6. Am I wrong ? FreeBSD does not support IPv6 ?
Sure it does. It just doesn't come out of the box with it because
Has anyone had any problems running FreeBSD-SMP on Intel GX-chipset
motherboards?
Conversely, does anyone have any recommendations for other motherboards
to buy?
- mark
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
On 22-Sep-99 Mark Newton wrote:
Has anyone had any problems running FreeBSD-SMP on Intel GX-chipset
motherboards?
I ran 3.2-RELEASE on a friends GX board. It was an Asus board, and had 5 PCI
slots, an inbuilt 7896 and onboard 10/100 ethernet. (I can't remember the model
number, I can find
:As I recall, we had two alternatives. First, knowingly not comply to
:the spec, because Solaris doesn't handle it. Second, change the way
:we read directories so we can avoid doing things in the way Solaris
:can't handle. The latter is a very sore spot, and not trivial.
:
:I was under the
52 matches
Mail list logo
