A few of us were talking on IRC tonight about how cool it would be to
have an httpfs filesystem -- then it occurred to me we almost have
this already, in the form of the (under-utilised) portalfs. Portalfs
works by handing off everything to a userland daemon which handles the
actual transaction
I don't have a link handy, but if you search for it, I'm sure it's out
there. Linux had something like this called PerlFS which was much more
generic. The general gist of it was you could use it to make fs's of
things like http and ftp. It was extendable (I think) so you could make
your own fs
Chen Zhao wrote:
\- Mike Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] stated on
/-[Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 06:02:22PM -0800]:
NDA's in this particular space serve a limited set of purposes:
- They constitute engineering damage control; witness Realtek's
unhappiness at Bill's honest commentary on
Hello!
I use recent FreeBSD-4-STABLE.
When I changed my processor from Intel Pentium 200 MMX to AMD K6-2 500,
I can neither recompile operating system nor compile other programs.
From kernel compilation:
cc -c -O -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes
\- Peter Wemm [EMAIL PROTECTED] stated on
/- [Sat, Mar 10, 2001 at 04:49:12AM -0800]:
I have the NDA'ed docs for the Intel gig and fxp cards. After Intel's
spectacular efforts to bury Johnathan Lemon's driver for their gig card
(that outperformed the Intel Linux driver by something like
On Sat, Mar 10, 2001 at 06:43:00PM +0300, Dmitry Sivachenko wrote:
Smells like dodgy hardware, especially memory. You are not
overclocking are you?
There are no problems with K6-2 FreeBSD, I ran it on a K6-2 @400
very successfully (now have an Athlon box).
Wilko
Hello!
I use recent
On Mar 10, Kris Kennaway wrote:
A few of us were talking on IRC tonight about how cool it would be to
have an httpfs filesystem -- then it occurred to me we almost have
this already, in the form of the (under-utilised) portalfs. Portalfs
works by handing off everything to a userland daemon
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Chen Zhao writes:
What is the next most (unofficially of course :) recommended NIC
in terms of driver stability, card reliability and performance,
and driver efficiency (low overhead, etc.), ignoring for the moment
actual NIC price, and just judging from a technical
Hello,
I'm afraid I might be walking up to a bikeshed with a can of paint
here, but the flood of email in the last twenty-four hours has
convinced me to ask.
In an article O'Reilly published yesterday, I stated (per the
Handbook) that context diffs were the correct way to submit patches
with
From: "Avery Fay" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Getting started (hacking that is)
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2001 17:02:49 -0500
I am interested in contributing code to the FreeBSD project, specifically
the kernel but I am not opposed to helping out with user applications if
they are in dire need of
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Michael Lucas writes:
Hello,
I'm afraid I might be walking up to a bikeshed with a can of paint
here, but the flood of email in the last twenty-four hours has
convinced me to ask.
In an article O'Reilly published yesterday, I stated (per the
Handbook) that context
I need not remind you that file systems front-ending onto random protocols
are a bad idea for a huge number of reasons :-).
That said, you might take a look at Intermezzo, which someone has already
refered to indirectly in response to your e-mail -- Intermezzo is a file
system for Linux (based
As a newcomer to this, I'm a little confused. There's a slew
of datasheets at Intel's web site
http://www.intel.com/design/network/datashts/index.htm
that don't seem to require NDA. (Just this week, I used the
82559 docs to implement a polled version of if_fxp).
If the components in
* Poul-Henning Kamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010310 10:37] wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Michael Lucas writes:
Hello,
I'm afraid I might be walking up to a bikeshed with a can of paint
here, but the flood of email in the last twenty-four hours has
convinced me to ask.
In an article
In article local.mail.freebsd-hackers/[EMAIL PROTECTED] you
write:
As a newcomer to this, I'm a little confused. There's a slew
of datasheets at Intel's web site
http://www.intel.com/design/network/datashts/index.htm
that don't seem to require NDA. (Just this week, I used the
82559
Michael Lucas wrote:
Hello,
I'm afraid I might be walking up to a bikeshed with a can of paint
here, but the flood of email in the last twenty-four hours has
convinced me to ask.
In an article O'Reilly published yesterday, I stated (per the
Handbook) that context diffs were the
At 01:11 AM 03/10/2001, Bill Paul wrote:
I think its been mentioned several times in this and other threads that
intel has a driver for LINUX that is effective documentation on the board,
and the code is public (although you may have to stick an intel copyright
in the code also).
The tulip cards can be quirky, if nothing else. I used to like the VIA Rhine
cards, because they were cheap, and I had no problems with them... until
suddenly they started crashing at 100Mbps. I don't know why; I ran some of
them under very heavy loads at 100Mbps. I can't tell whether it was
The handbook is wrong. Unidiffs are a far more advanced lifeform
than context diffs. :)
- Jordan
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
At 01:49 PM 03/10/2001, Romain Kang wrote:
As a newcomer to this, I'm a little confused. There's a slew
of datasheets at Intel's web site
http://www.intel.com/design/network/datashts/index.htm
that don't seem to require NDA. (Just this week, I used the
82559 docs to implement a polled
Hello Wilko,
Saturday, March 10, 2001, 7:14:08 PM, you wrote:
WB On Sat, Mar 10, 2001 at 06:43:00PM +0300, Dmitry Sivachenko wrote:
WB Smells like dodgy hardware, especially memory. You are not
WB overclocking are you?
WB There are no problems with K6-2 FreeBSD, I ran it on a K6-2 @400
WB
Is there a point of contact at Intel that we could all send e-mail to or
even send a formal letter? I am sure my buying 50 or so boards a year
isn't going to make a dent at Intel's bottom line, but considering how
their stock is doing lately and if we all contribute...
Thanks,
Tim
To
Each link is checked once every second to see if the link is still up.
An attempt to send a packet over a dead link will cause the packet to
be shifted over to the next link in the bundle.
Any chance this can be done through an async event rather
than by polling?
--
Justin
To Unsubscribe:
At 03:37 PM 03/10/2001, Tim wrote:
Is there a point of contact at Intel that we could all send e-mail to or
even send a formal letter? I am sure my buying 50 or so boards a year
isn't going to make a dent at Intel's bottom line, but considering how
their stock is doing lately and if we all
Unified diffs are also context diffs.
Context diffs are named such because they contain undisturbed context
around the changed lines, unlike normal diffs.
Erm, no. :)
Both context and unidiffs show surrounding context, it's simply the
meta-data format which changes. In the case of
My point of (failed) contact last April was a Gary @ 503 264 7243
(I was informed by Theo that he was "Intel's 'Open Source' representative)
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jordan Hubbard writes:
Unified diffs are also context diffs.
Context diffs are named such because they contain undisturbed context
around the changed lines, unlike normal diffs.
Erm, no. :)
Both context and unidiffs show surrounding context, it's simply the
At 03:42 PM 03/10/2001, Justin T. Gibbs wrote:
Each link is checked once every second to see if the link is still up.
An attempt to send a packet over a dead link will cause the packet to
be shifted over to the next link in the bundle.
Any chance this can be done through an async event rather
Each link is checked once every second to see if the link is still up.
An attempt to send a packet over a dead link will cause the packet to
be shifted over to the next link in the bundle.
Any chance this can be done through an async event rather
than by polling?
If there was, I would
Each link is checked once every second to see if the link is still up.
An attempt to send a packet over a dead link will cause the packet to
be shifted over to the next link in the bundle.
Any chance this can be done through an async event rather
than by polling?
If there was, I would
On Sat, Mar 10, 2001 at 11:21:59PM +0300, Dmitrij Sivacenko wrote:
WB Smells like dodgy hardware, especially memory. You are not
WB overclocking are you?
WB There are no problems with K6-2 FreeBSD, I ran it on a K6-2 @400
WB very successfully (now have an Athlon box).
WB Wilko
I
Each link is checked once every second to see if the link is still up.
An attempt to send a packet over a dead link will cause the packet to
be shifted over to the next link in the bundle.
Any chance this can be done through an async event rather
than by polling?
If there was, I
On 18 Jan 2001, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
Fun Things To Do With Disks #9,187:
Take a powered-up disk out of a hot-swap storage array and experiment
with the gyro effect while the disk spins down in your hands. Higher
RPMs give better results; try one of the 'cudas from that E10K in the
On 10-Mar-01 Jordan Hubbard wrote:
The handbook is wrong. Unidiffs are a far more advanced lifeform
than context diffs. :)
- Jordan
As phk explained, a unified diff is a context diff. :)
If many changed lines are interleaved with unchanged lines, I find that a
context diff is far easier
Richard Hodges [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, 8 Mar 2001, Rafael Tonin wrote:
Anyone knows how to get this card to work?
Go into your BIOS config and turn off the option
for "PLUG PLAY OS". It should be with the PCI menu.
No, turn "PLUG PLAY OS" *on* and add 'options PNPBIOS' to your
Poul-Henning Kamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jordan Hubbard writes:
Both context and unidiffs show surrounding context, it's simply the
meta-data format which changes. [...]
I repeat, with added emphasis: [...]
You're both either slightly off, or not expressing
Apologies for the off topic nature of the question...
I see FC drives for sale unbelievably cheap in a number of
places. megahaus.com has 36 GB IBM FC drives for $219, pricewatch has 9
GB and 18 GB drives from seagate and IBM for under $100.
The issue, of course, is that one needs a low cost
www.cinonic.com, I think.
- dan feldman
student, garfield high school, seattle
On Sat, 10 Mar 2001, David Miller wrote:
Apologies for the off topic nature of the question...
I see FC drives for sale unbelievably cheap in a number of
places. megahaus.com has 36 GB IBM FC drives for
Sorry to continue more OT stuff, but:
What FC host adapters are working well in FreeBSD?
I just found an Adaptec model used for very cheap. It's actually possible
that Fiber Channel could be cheaper than Ultra160 if you build your own
enclosure with Cinonic cards, buy clearance 1 GHz drives,
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Michael Lucas writes:
: Is the Handbook correct, or are unified diffs preferred? I'll be
: happy to fix my article and submit a PR to correct the Handbook if
: this is the case.
diff -c or diff -u is 1000% better than palin diff. That's what is
ment by "context" in
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jonathan
Lemon writes:
: You can't find the answers to any of these in the datasheets. The
: datasheets may provide a tiny bit of information, and hint at how things
: actually operate, but there is not sufficient information to develop a
: driver from them.
Their
Okay, maybe I'm missing something...
1. Has anyone tried one of these new Intel parts with BSD/OS?
2. Do any of the people involved with this have source licenses to BSD/OS?
I am quite sure BSDi hasn't been swamped with "help, my Intel card isn't
working" requests. I'm also quite sure that
Okay, maybe I'm missing something...
1. Has anyone tried one of these new Intel parts with BSD/OS?
2. Do any of the people involved with this have source licenses to BSD/OS?
I am quite sure BSDi hasn't been swamped with "help, my Intel card isn't
working" requests. I'm also quite sure
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Mike Smith writes:
The FreeBSD project already has a BSD/OS source distribution, however the
required information is NOT THERE. Ok?
Okay. I just figured I'd ask, since it's information I have.
Hmm.
Out of idle curiousity, has the NIH syndrome died down enough
Out of idle curiousity, has the NIH syndrome died down enough that it might
hypothetically be possible for the three major *BSD camps to cooperate on this
kind of thing?
No, I'm afraid it hasn't.
--
... every activity meets with opposition, everyone who acts has his
rivals and unfortunately
On Sat, 10 Mar 2001, Michael Lucas wrote:
Hello,
I'm afraid I might be walking up to a bikeshed with a can of paint
here, but the flood of email in the last twenty-four hours has
convinced me to ask.
In an article O'Reilly published yesterday, I stated (per the
Handbook) that context
Jordan DeLong wrote:
I was thinking of just getting a sintable array and making a few simple
functions, so the whole of libm doesn't need to be statically linked into the
module (from my understanding, once loaded, this module wont ever get paged out,
and thus it'd be _bad_ for it to be big).
Tim wrote:
Is there a point of contact at Intel that we could all send e-mail to or
even send a formal letter? I am sure my buying 50 or so boards a year
isn't going to make a dent at Intel's bottom line, but considering how
their stock is doing lately and if we all contribute...
Craig
The JMR 4-bay is about as cheap as you'll find as far as I know. The 2K$ plus
is for the 10 slot. There might be something cheaper at
http://www.scsistuff.com.
Yes. Pricey. The only other thing is to find (and I don't know a source) of
paddlebard adapters with the 40-pin SCA connector, a +5/+12
On Sat, 10 Mar 2001, Dan Feldman wrote:
Sorry to continue more OT stuff, but:
What FC host adapters are working well in FreeBSD?
I just found an Adaptec model used for very cheap. It's actually possible
that Fiber Channel could be cheaper than Ultra160 if you build your own
enclosure
50 matches
Mail list logo
