On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 12:51:19PM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
Well... when you 'gzip -9' something, it just takes longer, it doesn't
sometimes corrupt your data (afaik).
Hmm. gzip seems to be pretty good about those things. I guess it's one
of the few GNU programs to be that way. :^)
On Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 01:19:31AM -0800, Alex Zepeda wrote:
However, even the pgcc web page describes -O2 as safe.
I won't even to there...
Yes, scanning thru the ML leads me to believe some of these optimizations
are pretty much untested. Which is kinda funny, since the ia32 bits are
-On [20010310 01:00], Lyndon Nerenberg ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Perhaps a first step towards leaning on the vendors for documentation
is to publically declare our support for those vendors who *do*
release documentation under reasonable terms. One way to do this
is to acknowledge those vendors
Dear All,
In the interest of a unified BSD ports tree, is anyone working to integrate
the diffs for the make from openpackages into the FreeBSD codebase?
Kees Jan
You are only young once,
but you can stay immature all your life.
To
On Tue, 13 Mar 2001, Chris Sears wrote:
THANKS! and compliments on your name. It was a quick and simple
port to see if people were interested. I've sent it to the
author/maintainer Dan Hollis but I haven't gotten a response yet.
He has an email list on Yahoo/Groups and there is occasional
At 06:35 AM 03/14/2001, Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai wrote:
-On [20010310 01:00], Lyndon Nerenberg ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Perhaps a first step towards leaning on the vendors for documentation
is to publically declare our support for those vendors who *do*
release documentation under reasonable
* Dennis [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010314 08:14] wrote:
A better strategy would be to welcome ALL vendors AND binary distributions
(who may release source under NDA if they chose) so that the best products
could be available for FreeBSD without the adversity of the
"geek-revolution" that you
At 11:32 AM 03/14/2001, you wrote:
Dennis wrote:
At 06:35 AM 03/14/2001, Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai wrote:
-On [20010310 01:00], Lyndon Nerenberg ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Perhaps a first step towards leaning on the vendors for documentation
is to publically declare our support for those
* Dennis [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010314 09:21] wrote:
At 12:09 PM 03/14/2001, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
* Dennis [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010314 08:14] wrote:
A better strategy would be to welcome ALL vendors AND binary distributions
(who may release source under NDA if they chose) so that the best
:It will use all available memory for disk caching if possible, but it
:only caches things you've accessed at least once so I would say you
:simply haven't accessed more then 650MB or so worth of file data.
:
:Is it correct to say that cached file data (file content)
:is taken into
greet.
anybody? I end up compilling kde2.1 on 2.2.x with few
strange sigsegv from the aout assembler. I took the hint
and try to repeat the same manner using 4.x and -CURRENT
Seems like it's deal with pic generated code.
( /usr/libexec/aout/as , using gcc-2.95.2 and egcs-1.1.2 )
I already fix it
You cant strong-arm companies into making their intellectual properly
rights publicly available. its a losing argument.
Strange, in that it worked for a number of video-card vendors when
XFree86 either dropped support and/or never supported the card in
question.
Nate
To Unsubscribe: send
Mike (and Paul)
I'm fixing this so that it doesn't use the 2.x PCI compatibility
interface; there's a lot of other real ugliness in here, some of which is
probably worth throwing out.
I'm not exactly sure what you meant here. Do you mean the pci_readcfg calls?
I thought they were low-level
On Thu, Mar 15, 2001 at 01:46:16AM +1300, Dan Langille wrote:
On 14 Mar 2001, at 13:23, Koster, K.J. wrote:
In the interest of a unified BSD ports tree, is anyone working to integrate
the diffs for the make from openpackages into the FreeBSD codebase?
I think people might be waiting for
On Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 11:37:34AM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
ALL the time. Microsoft has given the UC-Davis security and formal
verification lab a multi-year grant to look at this problem.
(the approach being researched is "model checking")
How does one get the forms for these sort
Hey not sure this is the right list but here we go:
bladerunner:~ $ftp ftp.freebsd.org
Bad system call (core dumped)
keeps comming with most commands after i used the 4.1-REL - 4.x-STABLE
upgrade kit - any ideas how to salvage this system ?
Michael Aronsen
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL
At 02:31 PM 03/14/2001, Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai wrote:
-On [20010314 17:38], Dennis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
At 06:35 AM 03/14/2001, Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai wrote:
That's what Soeren and me did. HighPoint was very forthcoming with
documentation and as part of that synergy they put
At 01:47 PM 03/14/2001, you wrote:
On Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 09:09:15AM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
how many times does windows crash because of poorly written drivers
rather than flaws in the core OS? (*)
ALL the time. Microsoft has given the UC-Davis security and formal
verification lab
At 02:31 PM 03/14/2001, Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai wrote:
-On [20010314 17:38], Dennis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
At 06:35 AM 03/14/2001, Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai wrote:
That's what Soeren and me did. HighPoint was very forthcoming with
documentation and as part of that synergy they put
On Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 02:58:40AM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
I won't even to there...
Well, the only reason I mentioned it.. was that the pgcc folks don't seem
to be too delusioned about the dangers. -ON (N 2) is regarded as at
least possibly in danger of generating incorrect code.
Not
On Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 02:41:53PM -0800, Kent Stewart wrote:
With 2000 and above, your system will check for non-digitally signed
dll's and etc.
Being signed has nothing to do with correctly working.
The project I was speaking about wanted to be able to do something about
you buying that
On Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 04:51:14PM -0500, Dennis wrote:
Why would they need to do that? Every time you load a program it updates
the libraries, breaking older programs. Its a philosophical problem. You
dont need a grant to figure it out.
You JUST DON'T GET IT [academic research]. And any
On Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 03:12:41PM -0800, Alex Zepeda wrote:
Not untested -- but you should go grab a graduate text on compiler
optimizations and familiarize yourself with the complexity of the problem.
Care to recommend any starting places. You've piqued my interest.
Hi,
i'm trying to do some programming on freebsd and i can't
find 'asm/io.h'. this must be for security reasons.
so how do i talk to the parallel port?
Thanks,
Dave Seddon
here's the really simple bit of code i'm trying to use:
#include stdio.h
#include unistd.h /* needed for
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010314 16:11] wrote:
Hi,
i'm trying to do some programming on freebsd and i can't
find 'asm/io.h'. this must be for security reasons.
so how do i talk to the parallel port?
Thanks,
Dave Seddon
Generally it's a good idea to use "man -k" with
Hi,
i'm trying to do some programming on freebsd and i can't
find 'asm/io.h'. this must be for security reasons.
so how do i talk to the parallel port?
See /usr/share/examples/ppi, and the ppi(4) manpage.
--
... every activity meets with opposition, everyone who acts has his
rivals
Hi Readers,
Does anyone of you know about a book that would deal specifically
with FreeBSD device drivers dev.?
If yes let me know.
Most of the books in the field are written
for Linux and so on.
Thanks.
Jerry.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers"
I'm trying to reduce the number of patches in one of my ports, but neither
I nor the author of the software knows the solution to this problem. The
patch I'm trying to eliminate is:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/x11/xscreensaver/files/patch-ab?rev=1.7
that refers to -lXmu -lXt
On Sat, Mar 10, 2001 at 03:15:15AM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
A few of us were talking on IRC tonight about how cool it would be to
have an httpfs filesystem -- then it occurred to me we almost have
this already, in the form of the (under-utilised) portalfs. Portalfs
works by handing off
29 matches
Mail list logo
