Re: mmap MAP_INHERIT question.

2001-08-25 Thread Valentin Nechayev
Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 09:11:50, dillon (Matt Dillon) wrote about "Re: mmap MAP_INHERIT question.": > :> MAP_INHERIT This is supposed to permit regions to be > :> inherited across execve(2) system calls, > :> but is currently broken. > Ya

Re: ssh password cracker - now this *is* cool!

2001-08-25 Thread Valentin Nechayev
Sat, Aug 25, 2001 at 22:39:07, 520066542279-0001 (Harold Gutch) wrote about "Re: ssh password cracker - now this *is* cool!": > Dug Song and Solar Designer held a talk on this topic at HAL 2001, > where they stated that backspaces could be detected, as a > backspace actually translated to > t

Re: ssh password cracker - now this *is* cool!

2001-08-25 Thread James Snow
On Sun, Aug 26, 2001 at 06:32:56AM +0100, Ben Smithurst wrote: > > The issue I believe is passwords you type after logging in (e.g. > changing your password or logging into another machine), not the > password you actually use to log in... I just knew I was going to wind up tasting the sole of m

Re: ssh password cracker - now this *is* cool!

2001-08-25 Thread Ben Smithurst
James Snow wrote: > I'm just looking at packet dumps, not source, but it looks to me like > OpenSSH sends passwords all in one shot, not character by character. The issue I believe is passwords you type after logging in (e.g. changing your password or logging into another machine), not the passw

Re: ssh password cracker - now this *is* cool!

2001-08-25 Thread James Snow
On Sat, Aug 25, 2001 at 10:39:07PM +0200, Harold Gutch wrote: > > :* Matt Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010822 18:30] wrote: > > :> This gets an 'A' on my cool-o-meter. > > :> > > :> http://www.vnunet.com/News/1124839 > > Dug Song and Solar Designer held a talk on this topic at HAL 2001, > wh

Re: building 'release' and compiling doc ports

2001-08-25 Thread Bruce A. Mah
If memory serves me right, Wilko Bulte wrote: > On Sat, Aug 25, 2001 at 07:57:31AM -0700, Bruce A. Mah wrote: > > Oh heck. Alphas build docs with openjade, not jade. We forgot to deal > > with that in the definition of ${MINIMALDOCPORTS}, so release builds > > containing docs but not a ports t

Re: pci_get_devid()

2001-08-25 Thread Mike Smith
> I'm doing some PCI related code and keep running into the > function/method pci_get_devid() in FreeBSD source files (like > pcisupport.c). A couple of us have looked for this function in our > systems and can't seem to find it. Can anyone tell me where I can find > the source for pci_get_devid

Re: building 'release' and compiling doc ports

2001-08-25 Thread Wilko Bulte
On Sat, Aug 25, 2001 at 05:50:54PM +0200, Wilko Bulte wrote: > On Sat, Aug 25, 2001 at 05:42:08PM +0200, Wilko Bulte wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 25, 2001 at 07:57:31AM -0700, Bruce A. Mah wrote: > > > [Removing mi from explicit recipients to spare him the agony.] > > > I'll try when I get back home. I

Re: PCI Enumeration

2001-08-25 Thread Mike Smith
> I am working on an embedded FreeBSD (4.2) device with proprietary PCI > devices on the bus.. I don't have a FreeBSD background and am having > trouble finding the right underlying code to hook into, for what we need > to do. Basically two things need to happen: > > 1) Need to be able to enume

Re: cvsup ports always failed

2001-08-25 Thread Chris Faulhaber
On Sat, Aug 25, 2001 at 05:46:45PM +0200, Chojin wrote: > Hello, > > I hope someone could help me because I don't know what to do. > > I had error in cvsup to update my ports. > Since this error I putted more memory ( I have 650 Mb now), reinstalled my > system (cvsup and make world) and recompi

Re: cvsup ports always failed

2001-08-25 Thread Rino Mardo
> Hello, > > I hope someone could help me because I don't know what to do. > > I had error in cvsup to update my ports. > Since this error I putted more memory ( I have 650 Mb now), reinstalled my > system (cvsup and make world) and recompiled my kernel. > > After all done (and rebooted) I do my c

Re: cvsup RELENG_4 = 4.4-RC1 ?

2001-08-25 Thread Doug Reynolds
On Sat, 25 Aug 2001 10:10:25 +0200, Chojin wrote: >I want to know if RELENG_4 will download 4.4-RC1 or lastest 4.3-STABLE files >Because I don't want to be in 4.4-RC1, too many problems. you'd want the RELENG_4_3 it just includes the security fixes. --- doug reynolds | the maverick | [EMAIL PR

Re: ssh password cracker - now this *is* cool!

2001-08-25 Thread Warner Losh
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Harold Gutch writes: : Dug Song and Solar Designer held a talk on this topic at HAL 2001, : where they stated that backspaces could be detected, as a : backspace actually translated to : thus sending 3 characters at a time instead of only 1. Not if echo was turned

Re: ssh password cracker - now this *is* cool!

2001-08-25 Thread Harold Gutch
On Sat, Aug 25, 2001 at 10:48:13PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Harold Gutch writes: > >On Wed, Aug 22, 2001 at 04:47:15PM -0700, Matt Dillon wrote: > >> :* Matt Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010822 18:30] wrote: > >> :> This gets an 'A' on my cool-o-meter. >

Re: ssh password cracker - now this *is* cool!

2001-08-25 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Harold Gutch writes: >On Wed, Aug 22, 2001 at 04:47:15PM -0700, Matt Dillon wrote: >> :* Matt Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010822 18:30] wrote: >> :> This gets an 'A' on my cool-o-meter. >> :> >> :> http://www.vnunet.com/News/1124839 >> : >> :Interesting, I gu

Re: ssh password cracker - now this *is* cool!

2001-08-25 Thread Harold Gutch
On Wed, Aug 22, 2001 at 04:47:15PM -0700, Matt Dillon wrote: > :* Matt Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010822 18:30] wrote: > :> This gets an 'A' on my cool-o-meter. > :> > :>http://www.vnunet.com/News/1124839 > : > :Interesting, I guess one could work around it by periodically > :sending bog

Re: Proposed Utility - detach(1)

2001-08-25 Thread Julian Elischer
Valentin Nechayev wrote: > > Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 14:19:55, mike (Mike Barcroft) wrote about "Proposed Utility - >detach(1)": > > > I would appreciate comments on the usefulness of a utility which would > > allow one to detach a process from a TTY. I imagine the utility would > > be very smal

Re: Possible race in i386/i386/pmap.c:pmap_copy()

2001-08-25 Thread Julian Elischer
Mike Silbersack wrote: > > On Sat, 25 Aug 2001, Julian Elischer wrote: > > > AH yes, it's a race for KSe, but we are 1:1 still so it's not a problem (yet :-) > > ( at least, not the one that's hitteng me at the moment) > > Well, don't get frustrated, look on the bright side of things: Even if

Re: Possible race in i386/i386/pmap.c:pmap_copy()

2001-08-25 Thread Matt Dillon
: :On Sat, 25 Aug 2001, Julian Elischer wrote: : :> AH yes, it's a race for KSe, but we are 1:1 still so it's not a problem (yet :-) :> ( at least, not the one that's hitteng me at the moment) : :Well, don't get frustrated, look on the bright side of things: Even if :you don't have KSE running in

Re: function calls/rets in assembly

2001-08-25 Thread Valentin Nechayev
Sat, Aug 25, 2001 at 16:03:02, roam (Peter Pentchev) wrote about "Re: function calls/rets in assembly": > I wonder if a mentioning of -mpreferred-stack-boundary should be > added to tuning(7).. This will be quite strange idea. Tuning which reduces 2-4 times stack size of userland application.

Realtime, kposix

2001-08-25 Thread Anders Nor Berle
Does the options P1003_1B and _KPOSIX_PRIORITY_SCHEDULING affect general performance? To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Re: Possible race in i386/i386/pmap.c:pmap_copy()

2001-08-25 Thread Mike Silbersack
On Sat, 25 Aug 2001, Julian Elischer wrote: > AH yes, it's a race for KSe, but we are 1:1 still so it's not a problem (yet :-) > ( at least, not the one that's hitteng me at the moment) Well, don't get frustrated, look on the bright side of things: Even if you don't have KSE running in the ne

Re: building 'release' and compiling doc ports

2001-08-25 Thread Wilko Bulte
On Sat, Aug 25, 2001 at 05:42:08PM +0200, Wilko Bulte wrote: > On Sat, Aug 25, 2001 at 07:57:31AM -0700, Bruce A. Mah wrote: > > [Removing mi from explicit recipients to spare him the agony.] > I'll try when I get back home. I just managed to lockup the DS10 remotely > (grr) by typing "show power

cvsup ports always failed

2001-08-25 Thread Chojin
Hello, I hope someone could help me because I don't know what to do. I had error in cvsup to update my ports. Since this error I putted more memory ( I have 650 Mb now), reinstalled my system (cvsup and make world) and recompiled my kernel. After all done (and rebooted) I do my cvsup /usr/share

Re: building 'release' and compiling doc ports

2001-08-25 Thread Wilko Bulte
On Sat, Aug 25, 2001 at 07:57:31AM -0700, Bruce A. Mah wrote: > [Removing mi from explicit recipients to spare him the agony.] Sorry mi, should have done that myself. > If memory serves me right, Wilko Bulte wrote: > > > > > The DS10 is now rolling tarballs (with NODOC=YES) so that make release

Re: cvsup RELENG_4 = 4.4-RC1 ?

2001-08-25 Thread Peter Pentchev
On Sat, Aug 25, 2001 at 10:07:18AM -0500, Conrad Sabatier wrote: > > On 25-Aug-2001 Peter Pentchev wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 25, 2001 at 09:45:41AM -0500, Conrad Sabatier wrote: > >> > >> On 25-Aug-2001 Chojin wrote: > >> > Hello, > >> > > >> > I want to know if RELENG_4 will download 4.4-RC1 or l

Re: cvsup RELENG_4 = 4.4-RC1 ?

2001-08-25 Thread Conrad Sabatier
On 25-Aug-2001 Peter Pentchev wrote: > On Sat, Aug 25, 2001 at 09:45:41AM -0500, Conrad Sabatier wrote: >> >> On 25-Aug-2001 Chojin wrote: >> > Hello, >> > >> > I want to know if RELENG_4 will download 4.4-RC1 or lastest 4.3-STABLE >> > files >> > ? >> > Because I don't want to be in 4.4-RC1, t

Re: cvsup RELENG_4 = 4.4-RC1 ?

2001-08-25 Thread Peter Pentchev
On Sat, Aug 25, 2001 at 09:45:41AM -0500, Conrad Sabatier wrote: > > On 25-Aug-2001 Chojin wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I want to know if RELENG_4 will download 4.4-RC1 or lastest 4.3-STABLE files > > ? > > Because I don't want to be in 4.4-RC1, too many problems. > > Then you don't want to cvsup

Re: building 'release' and compiling doc ports

2001-08-25 Thread Bruce A. Mah
[Removing mi from explicit recipients to spare him the agony.] If memory serves me right, Wilko Bulte wrote: > > > The DS10 is now rolling tarballs (with NODOC=YES) so that make release > > > appears to have run OK. I can try (overnight) a new make release without > > > the NODOC and see what to

RE: cvsup RELENG_4 = 4.4-RC1 ?

2001-08-25 Thread Conrad Sabatier
On 25-Aug-2001 Chojin wrote: > Hello, > > I want to know if RELENG_4 will download 4.4-RC1 or lastest 4.3-STABLE files > ? > Because I don't want to be in 4.4-RC1, too many problems. Then you don't want to cvsup RELENG_4, I guess. More problems in 4.3-STABLE than in RC, actually. Just relax a

PCI Enumeration

2001-08-25 Thread djohnson
I am working on an embedded FreeBSD (4.2) device with proprietary PCI devices on the bus.. I don't have a FreeBSD background and am having trouble finding the right underlying code to hook into, for what we need to do. Basically two things need to happen: 1) Need to be able to enumerate the PCI

Re: function calls/rets in assembly

2001-08-25 Thread Peter Pentchev
On Sat, Aug 25, 2001 at 03:44:27PM +0300, Valentin Nechayev wrote: > Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 11:36:45, jhb (John Baldwin) wrote about "Re: function >calls/rets in assembly": > > > > printasint: > > > pushl %ebp > > > movl %esp,%ebp > > > subl $8,%esp > > > addl $-8,%esp >

Re: Proposed Utility - detach(1)

2001-08-25 Thread Valentin Nechayev
Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 14:19:55, mike (Mike Barcroft) wrote about "Proposed Utility - detach(1)": > I would appreciate comments on the usefulness of a utility which would > allow one to detach a process from a TTY. I imagine the utility would > be very small and just call daemon(3) and execlp(3

Re: function calls/rets in assembly

2001-08-25 Thread Valentin Nechayev
Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 11:36:45, jhb (John Baldwin) wrote about "Re: function calls/rets in assembly": > > printasint: > > pushl %ebp > > movl %esp,%ebp > > subl $8,%esp > > addl $-8,%esp [...] > Because this code is broken and obfuscated? :) > > We save %esp in %ebp (t

Re: running diff on huge files

2001-08-25 Thread Peter Pentchev
On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 06:23:31PM -0700, Rob wrote: > I am trying to run diff on two huge files (220M) and I run out of swap > space. Is there another alternative? I have a Python script that does > something similar, but works on huge files, but it is much slower than > diff. Thanks, Rob. H

Re: cvsup RELENG_4 = 4.4-RC1 ?

2001-08-25 Thread Peter Pentchev
On Sat, Aug 25, 2001 at 01:16:00AM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Sat, Aug 25, 2001 at 10:10:25AM +0200, Chojin wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I want to know if RELENG_4 will download 4.4-RC1 or lastest 4.3-STABLE files > > ? > > Because I don't want to be in 4.4-RC1, too many problems. > > "The la

Re: your mail

2001-08-25 Thread Peter Pentchev
Now why do I have this uneasy feeling that you just fell for a spammer's email address collection bait.. G'luck, Peter -- If wishes were fishes, the antecedent of this conditional would be true. On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 08:42:17AM -0700, Laurence Berland wrote: > From now on, please use the tes

RFT: bootable .iso available for test

2001-08-25 Thread Wilko Bulte
Hi I have put a freshly build 4.4-RC/Alpha .iso up for download on freefall. You can get it using: fetch -v http://freefall.freebsd.org/~wilko/disc1-nodoc.iso.bz2 -rw-r--r-- 1 wilko wilko 149947435 Aug 24 23:52 disc1-nodoc.iso.bz2 MD5 (disc1-nodoc.iso.bz2) = bb56aa31571dd9524b02951bfaba7a90

Re: cvsup RELENG_4 = 4.4-RC1 ?

2001-08-25 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sat, Aug 25, 2001 at 10:21:49AM +0200, Chojin wrote: > And then RELENG_4_3 is to update lastest files for 4.3-STABLE. Right ? No, RELENG_4_3 is the "4.3-RELEASE security fix branch". It only contains security patches (which are also in RELENG_4). Kris PGP signature

Re: cvsup RELENG_4 = 4.4-RC1 ?

2001-08-25 Thread Jim Mock
On Sat, 25 Aug 2001 at 10:21:49 +0200, Chojin wrote: > And then RELENG_4_3 is to update lastest files for 4.3-STABLE. Right ? No. - jim -- jim mock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> tech writer | iXsystems, Inc. http://soupnazi.org/ work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubs

Re: cvsup RELENG_4 = 4.4-RC1 ?

2001-08-25 Thread Chojin
And then RELENG_4_3 is to update lastest files for 4.3-STABLE. Right ? - Original Message - From: "Kris Kennaway" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Chojin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, August 25, 2001 10:16 AM Subject: Re: cvsup RELENG_4 = 4.4-R

Re: cvsup RELENG_4 = 4.4-RC1 ?

2001-08-25 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sat, Aug 25, 2001 at 10:10:25AM +0200, Chojin wrote: > Hello, > > I want to know if RELENG_4 will download 4.4-RC1 or lastest 4.3-STABLE files > ? > Because I don't want to be in 4.4-RC1, too many problems. "The latest 4.3-STABLE" *is* 4.4-RC. See the handbook for a full description of how F

cvsup RELENG_4 = 4.4-RC1 ?

2001-08-25 Thread Chojin
Hello, I want to know if RELENG_4 will download 4.4-RC1 or lastest 4.3-STABLE files ? Because I don't want to be in 4.4-RC1, too many problems. Regards, Chojin To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message