Steve Roome wrote:
Can these newer drives, based on the IC-35L0?0-chipset, also be used
with TCQ enabled in FBSD? (? is 2, 4 or 6 depending on whether the
drive has 20, 40 or 60 GB capacity).
I've got one of these :
ad0: 39266MB IC35L040AVER07-0 [79780/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA66
Nate Williams wrote:
TRW supported a lot of the early
386BSD/FreeBSD effort, back before Walnut Creek CDROM threw
in and had us change the version number from 0.1 to 1.0 to
make it a bit easier to sell.
*Huh* That's revisionist history if I've ever heard it. We
did a 1.0 release for
TRW supported a lot of the early
386BSD/FreeBSD effort, back before Walnut Creek CDROM threw
in and had us change the version number from 0.1 to 1.0 to
make it a bit easier to sell.
*Huh* That's revisionist history if I've ever heard it. We
did a 1.0 release for FreeBSD
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
Nate,
You're replying to Terry for christs sake! What did you expect if not
revisionist $anything ?
Which reminds me, Adrian still oves us his story about ref :-)
Poul, you're going off again, without regard for facts.
Remember the last time FreeBSD history
It seems Steve Roome wrote:
On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 07:20:30PM +0200, Niek Bergboer wrote:
Can these newer drives, based on the IC-35L0?0-chipset, also be used
with TCQ enabled in FBSD? (? is 2, 4 or 6 depending on whether the
drive has 20, 40 or 60 GB capacity).
Yes, and support has been
You're replying to Terry for christs sake! What did you expect if not
revisionist $anything ?
Which reminds me, Adrian still oves us his story about ref :-)
Poul, you're going off again, without regard for facts.
Remember the last time FreeBSD history came up, I proved Nate
Hello,
#dmesg | grep IP
plip0: PLIP network interface on ppbus0
IP Filter: v3.4.16 initialized. Default = pass all, Logging = enabled
IP Filter: already initialized
IP Filter: v3.4.16 unloaded
module_register_init: MOD_LOAD (IP Filter: v3.4.16, c0388278, 0) error 16
It seems there is an error
When I apply the patch :
[ /usr/src/usr.sbin/adduser]$patch -p /home/chojin/patch/rmuser.patch
Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--
|Index: rmuser.perl
|===
|RCS
I've look at /sys/dev/iicbus/iiconf.c:
int
iicbus_read(device_t bus, char *buf, int len, int *read, int last, int delay)
{
struct iicbus_softc *sc = (struct iicbus_softc *)device_get_softc(bus);
/* a slave must have been started with the appropriate address */
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], s $B$5$s$$$o$/(B:
I've look at /sys/dev/iicbus/iiconf.c:
int
iicbus_read(device_t bus, char *buf, int len, int *read, int last, int delay
)
{
struct iicbus_softc *sc = (struct iicbus_softc *)device_get_softc(bus);
/* a slave must have been
Nate Williams wrote:
Bill Jolitz approved a 0.5 interim release of 386BSD
And then Lynn revoked this, and posted a public message to the world
stating what obnoxious fiends we were.
Actually, Lynne didn't have the right to do this; the trademark
was Bill's, so the revocation wasn't valid
Nate Williams wrote:
You're not the only pack-rat around here. Be careful of your claims,
since they could come back to bite you.
I'm willing to be bitten in public, if I'm wrong... always have
been. ;-).
ps. I still have my phone-logs of my conversations with Bill as well. ;)
Now I'm
Bill Jolitz approved a 0.5 interim release of 386BSD
And then Lynn revoked this, and posted a public message to the world
stating what obnoxious fiends we were.
Actually, Lynne didn't have the right to do this; the trademark
was Bill's, so the revocation wasn't valid until Bill did
On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 10:23:57AM +0200, Chojin wrote:
When I apply the patch :
[ /usr/src/usr.sbin/adduser]$patch -p /home/chojin/patch/rmuser.patch
Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--
|Index: rmuser.perl
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Terry Lambert writes:
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
Nate,
You're replying to Terry for christs sake! What did you expect if not
revisionist $anything ?
Which reminds me, Adrian still oves us his story about ref :-)
Poul, you're going off again, without regard
Kevin Way [EMAIL PROTECTED] types:
You can even do this in userland with an nfs server API if you
want it to be portable.
Novel idea. I'll file it into the maybe pile.
Old idea. I first saw an ftp version of this in '91 or '92. Last time
I went looking for source code, I couldn't find it,
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
*I* worked at TFS, I even kept ref.tfs.com alive after Julian went AWOL.
I'm well aware of your checkered past... 8-).
I guess Julian might pipe up now about the use of the acronym
AWOL...
Now, remind me again why historians are so picky about primary
sources and
On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 11:37:39AM +0800, Igor Podlesny wrote:
[snip]
Screen is a nice thing, I agree. Just one drawback is (Ctrl-A)*N
consoles (i.e., when you use screen at local console, than log in
into another box and run screen there. Local screen will see catch
Ctrl-A and you're
Hello,
The last is a dual processor alpha board. Alpha motherboards have
generally better memory IO, including 2.6 Gb/Sec to main memory.
Unfortunately it can only take 2 gig of RAM.
AFAIK, that's not a problem, because FreeBSD on alpha can't handle more
than that...
Thus spake Kris Kennaway ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 09:52:34AM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
I have it fixed now in my local CVS tree. Hopefully Kris will commit
something to fix it soon :-)
I'm just curious:
How do people fix stuff in their local CVS tree and sync
you should check the settings of your switch ports and look into the
output of 'ifconfig -a'.
try nailing the switch to 100baseTX.full duplex and set up the network
card with 'ifconfig fxp0 media 100baseTX mediaopt full-duplex'
this solves carrier transition problems with stupid switch hardware
My greetings!
I noticed that some mailers (sendmail, postfix) in case they allow
relayingforsomedomain.zonealsoallowrelayingfor
subdomain-of.somedomain.zone.
I can accept this as reasonable behavior but would like to know how to
deny it! :) Also I wish to know what
Thus spake Peter Pentchev ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
One way that (I think it was) Sheldon pointed out to me a few months
ago would be keeping your own CVS repository and vendor-importing
the FreeBSD source on a regular basis. The regular vendor-import
is quite time-consuming though :(
That
On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 01:10:27PM +0200, Alexander Langer wrote:
Thus spake Kris Kennaway ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 09:52:34AM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
I have it fixed now in my local CVS tree. Hopefully Kris will commit
something to fix it soon :-)
On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 09:07:19PM +0800, Igor Podlesny wrote:
My greetings!
I noticed that some mailers (sendmail, postfix) in case they allow
relayingforsomedomain.zonealsoallowrelayingfor
subdomain-of.somedomain.zone.
I can accept this as reasonable
On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 01:10:27PM +0200, Alexander Langer wrote:
Thus spake Kris Kennaway ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 09:52:34AM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
I have it fixed now in my local CVS tree. Hopefully Kris will commit
something to fix it soon :-)
Hi All,
I am trying to create threads under HP-UX 11 using POSIX threads library and
using the method pthread_create(...).
But I don't know how can I create a thread in a suspended state.
Thanks in advance
Ullasan
On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 04:18:19PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
I am trying to create threads under HP-UX 11 using POSIX threads library and
using the method pthread_create(...).
But I don't know how can I create a thread in a suspended state.
Thanks in advance
This
Help!!! What can I do???
/var/log/messages:
Sep 5 09:49:26 Brparcunix02 /kernel: xl0: no memory for rx list -- packet
dropped!
Sep 5 09:49:56 Brparcunix02 /kernel: xl0: no memory for rx list -- packet
dropped!
Sep 5 09:51:56 Brparcunix02 /kernel: xl0: no memory for rx list -- packet
dropped!
Hi Daniel,
Check netstat -m to see if your are out of mbufs (my guess)
To fix this see the man page for 'tuning'
It describes how to increase the network buffers on your system.
Best regards,
---
Nicolai Petri
- Original Message -
From: Daniel Abad [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL
poige I noticed that some mailers (sendmail, postfix) in case they allow
poige relayingforsomedomain.zonealsoallowrelayingfor
poige subdomain-of.somedomain.zone.
poige I can accept this as reasonable behavior but would like to know how to
poige deny it! :) Also I wish
I think that´s the problem
1598/1616/4096 mbufs in use (current/peak/max):
1107 mbufs allocated to data
491 mbufs allocated to packet headers
1024/1024/1024 mbuf clusters in use (current/peak/max)
2452 Kbytes allocated to network (79% of mb_map in use)
8784 requests for memory
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Peter Pentchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, I'm not really sure if CVS would allow having two vendor branches
(say, RELENG_4 and RELENG_5) and two corresponding working branches
(your changes to RELENG_4 and your changes to RELENG_5, which might
The code of usr.sbin/ac/ includes support for handling :0.0 as
console logins, when CONSOLE_TTY is defined during compilation.
Looking at the code, and revisions from 1.2 and up, this doesn't seem
to be used. Is there any reason why this should not be removed from
the sources. It's not used
I know gdb can source stepping the kernel. But without two machines, you
can not do it. Now I have only one machine and the system panic:
db trace
bqrelse(cxxx, cxxx, cxxx, c, cxxx) at bqrelse+0x25
is there a way to use these addresses to figure out which line or lines of
source are
On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 12:19:27PM +0200, Attila Nagy wrote:
Hello,
The last is a dual processor alpha board. Alpha motherboards have
generally better memory IO, including 2.6 Gb/Sec to main memory.
Unfortunately it can only take 2 gig of RAM.
AFAIK, that's not a problem, because
You can use gdb on the dump file or even on live kernel after reboot to figure
out exactly what the problem was.
Use
gdb -k ./kernel.debug /dev/mem
or
gdb -k ./kernel.debug /var/crash/vmcore.num
On 05-Sep-2001 Zhihui Zhang wrote:
I know gdb can source stepping the kernel. But without two
Igor Podlesny wrote:
I noticed that some mailers (sendmail, postfix) in case they allow
relayingforsomedomain.zonealsoallowrelayingfor
subdomain-of.somedomain.zone.
I can accept this as reasonable behavior but would like to know how to
deny it! :) Also I wish to
John Polstra wrote:
CVS claims to support multiple vendor branches, but in practice it
doesn't work in any useful sense. There's at least one place in the
CVS sources where the vendor branch is hard-coded as 1.1.1. You
really don't want to use multiple vendor branches -- trust me. :-)
Use
you can gdb -k mykernel /dev/mem
and do
list bqrelse+0x25
(I think)
alternatively,
in ddb you can do:
x/iii bqrelse
and work out what is wrong by reading the machine instructions
WHen I have one machine I usually debug by running the new kernel
within a VMWARE virtual
CVS claims to support multiple vendor branches, but in practice it
doesn't work in any useful sense. There's at least one place in the
CVS sources where the vendor branch is hard-coded as 1.1.1. You
really don't want to use multiple vendor branches -- trust me. :-)
Use two
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Nate Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any chance of getting CVSup to transfer from a remote repository
to a local vendor branch, instead of from a remote repository to
a local repository?
The problem is that you aren't just transferring bits from the
Any chance of getting CVSup to transfer from a remote repository
to a local vendor branch, instead of from a remote repository to
a local repository?
The problem is that you aren't just transferring bits from the HEAD, but
from multiple active branches. As John already stated,
Hello, sos
Søren Schmidt wrote:
[SNIP]
Anyhow, the problem at hand is more like bad chipsets, there is ALOT
of ATA chipsets thats not working right when used the way needed for
tagged queuing. That said, the IBM DTLA's series of drives are extremely
is there some place where a recommended
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Nate
Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, you're saying that the person would choose the branch (which may
be RELENG_4 *OR* HEAD).
Yep. For instance, a company might have a product that's based on
RELENG_4, but with some local mods. So FreeBSD-4.x is in effect
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
I am trying to create threads under HP-UX 11 using POSIX threads library and
using the method pthread_create(...).
But I don't know how can I create a thread in a suspended state.
First the obligatory off topic humor:
This is not the place to ask about
Nate Williams wrote:
I guess I'll ask the usual question:
Any chance of getting CVSup to transfer from a remote repository
to a local vendor branch, instead of from a remote repository to
a local repository?
The problem is that you aren't just transferring bits from the HEAD, but
John Polstra wrote:
No, Terry's idea is sound as long as you only try to track one branch
of FreeBSD. I.e., you consider FreeBSD to be your vendor, and you do
a checkout-mode type of fetch from a branch of the FreeBSD repository
and directly import it onto your own vendor branch. This would
On Wed, 5 Sep 2001, Zhihui Zhang wrote:
On Wed, 5 Sep 2001, Julian Elischer wrote:
WHen I have one machine I usually debug by running the new kernel
within a VMWARE virtual machine. Using the nmdm driver
you can run gdb in the main machine to debug it, all within one machine.
As a workaround, people could just gat the source each week
and do an cvs import into the vendor branch via script..
(of course with doing it correctly you could have matching version numbers
on the vendor branch)
On Wed, 5 Sep 2001, John Polstra wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Nate
Your snapshot is cool and I have found your old mail regarding VMWARE.
One more question: Is X-windows needed for this stuff?
Thanks,
-Zhihui
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Terry Lambert writes:
: Yes, precisely. People always complain that companies are
: gun-shy of -current; the inability to tag a sufficiently
: stable version is why most companies stay away from it.
For what its worth, I did most of the pccard based work in
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Julian
Elischer writes:
: As a workaround, people could just gat the source each week
: and do an cvs import into the vendor branch via script..
: (of course with doing it correctly you could have matching version numbers
: on the vendor branch)
As someone who does
On 05-Sep-01 Terry Lambert wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
I am trying to create threads under HP-UX 11 using POSIX threads library
and
using the method pthread_create(...).
But I don't know how can I create a thread in a suspended state.
First the obligatory off topic
[ I really hate it when my window manager gets stuck in a loop spinning while
I'm composing a mail message and I forget to fix up the mail message.
*sigh* ]
On 05-Sep-01 Terry Lambert wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
I am trying to create threads under HP-UX 11 using POSIX
On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 09:33:55PM +0200, Thierry Herbelot wrote:
known-bad revision for these babies -, and the 762 North Bridge of the
soon to be there SMP Athlon)
Soon to be there?? Hum... I'm typing to you from one.
--
-- David ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL
I'd like to propose committing the following change which adds a new
undocumented option in the spirit of PCI_ENABLE_IO_MODES. The new option
(PCI_ALLOW_UNSUPPORTED_IO_RANGE) allows me to boot my old HP Omnibook
4150 while docked. Since I've seen a couple other people need this fix,
I figure it
I'd be OK with this being done as a hack for now. I think the bridge
code needs to be a bit kinder about allowing stupid things to be done
if they're set up by the BIOS.
I'd like to propose committing the following change which adds a new
undocumented option in the spirit of
Hi all,
This patch has the official GCC 2.95 fixes for sjlj exceptions.
As you may know, the ones we have in our tree are the sjlj changes that
were in 2.95.3.test3, but removed for 2.95.3.test4.
I would like to apply this patch to -current and then -stable afterwards.
I have one good report,
poige I noticed that some mailers (sendmail, postfix) in case they allow
poige relayingforsomedomain.zonealsoallowrelayingfor
poige subdomain-of.somedomain.zone.
poige I can accept this as reasonable behavior but would like to know how to
poige deny it! :) Also I
Igor Podlesny wrote:
I noticed that some mailers (sendmail, postfix) in case they allow
relayingforsomedomain.zonealsoallowrelayingfor
subdomain-of.somedomain.zone.
I can accept this as reasonable behavior but would like to know how to
deny it! :) Also I wish
poige Yes, I saw this info here:
poige http://www.sendmail.org/m4/features.html#relay_mail_frombut most
poige valuable part of my question was about the purpose or the idea behind
poige this, cause it's not too clear to me why allowing relaying
On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 09:07:19PM +0800, Igor Podlesny wrote:
My greetings!
I noticed that some mailers (sendmail, postfix) in case they allow
relayingforsomedomain.zonealsoallowrelayingfor
subdomain-of.somedomain.zone.
I can accept this as reasonable
David O'Brien wrote:
On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 09:33:55PM +0200, Thierry Herbelot wrote:
known-bad revision for these babies -, and the 762 North Bridge of the
soon to be there SMP Athlon)
Soon to be there?? Hum... I'm typing to you from one.
Excuse me : I meant for the common mortal,
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Terry Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John Polstra wrote:
I have had this on my to-do list for a long time, but I have no idea
if or when it'll ever get implemented. It would require a focused
period of working on it that I just don't have these days.
On Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 06:40:01AM +0200, Thierry Herbelot wrote:
On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 09:33:55PM +0200, Thierry Herbelot wrote:
known-bad revision for these babies -, and the 762 North Bridge of the
soon to be there SMP Athlon)
Soon to be there?? Hum... I'm typing to you from
poige Yes, I saw this info here:
poige http://www.sendmail.org/m4/features.html#relay_mail_frombut most
poige valuable part of my question was about the purpose or the idea behind
poige this, cause it's not too clear to me why allowing relaying
Can someone take a look at this PR ?
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=30317
It's necessary to fix compilation issues for a POSIX compliant Java VM,
that uses sockets.
There are similar open bug reports against NetBSD too, without any
comments on why this change can not be made.
While on the subject of VFS locking...
Accessing devfs through a nullfs redirection causes a panic() due to
locking issues. I haven't had time to look at this in detail yet, if
somebody wants to jump up and fix the problem, feel free...
-Jon
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mike Silbersack wrote:
Similarly, there are a number of bugs in the TCP sockets as
well; specifically, there's a problem with all sockets being
treated as being in the same collision domain, when doing
automatic port assignment. This limits you to 65535 oubound
TCP connections, even
70 matches
Mail list logo
