-Original Message-
From: Doug Hass [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 6:53 AM
To: Ted Mittelstaedt
Cc: Jim Bryant; MurrayTaylor; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; Alfred Shippen
Subject: RE: FYI
Hi Doug,
I'm going to address myself to these points openly as
-Original Message-
From: Doug Hass [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 8:04 AM
To: Leo Bicknell
Cc: Ted Mittelstaedt; Jim Bryant; MurrayTaylor;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Alfred
Shippen
Subject: Re: FYI
Would your agreements allow you to provide
-Original Message-
From: Doug Hass [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 8:56 AM
To: Leo Bicknell
Cc: Ted Mittelstaedt; Jim Bryant; MurrayTaylor;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: FYI
In a private e-mail, Leo writes:
You offered a discount on these
On Mon, Oct 15, 2001 at 09:35:58AM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Peter van Heusden writes:
: I noticed that PCI modems are detected in /sys/isa/sio.c. I added the
: chip
: id of the modem to the list of PCI devices (pci_ids), and now
: sio_pci_probe detects the
On Tue, Oct 16, 2001 at 02:08:38PM +0930, Andrew Reid wrote:
On Mon, Oct 15, 2001 at 09:20:17PM -0500, Dan Nelson wrote:
That's a bit of a problem as far as I'm concerned. Perhaps the network
scripts should be redesigned in a similar manner to the one taken on be
RedHat.
Of
On Tue, 16 Oct 2001, Peter van Heusden wrote:
On Mon, Oct 15, 2001 at 09:35:58AM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Peter van Heusden writes:
I'm having a look at the Linux 2.4 kernel code, since they apparently
have winmodem support (including for the SM56 chipset,
Hi I was previously using FreeBSD 4.2 RELEASE and it ran stable but since
I've made a new install on the system on the new hard drive I've put 4.4
RELEASE on the new hard drive and the new Promise TX-2 controller which are
both working fine but after 4 or so days the 3COM 900TPO network card on
The hardware API or the actual register interface code, is a binary-only
module that is snapped in to SAND. SAND is GPL and is similar to the
FreeBSD Netgraph module - it provides all the higher-level protocol stuff,
like
Frame Relay, PPP, HDLC, and such. SAND goes between the OS TCP/IP
There is depending on the price. I'll freely admit however that I have not
priced the competitive serial sync cards that are currently supported
under FreeBSD, so I don't know how the WANic 400 or 500 stacks up against
them. For all I know right now there's someone just bringing a T1
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Matthew
Emmerton writes:
: On Tue, 16 Oct 2001, Peter van Heusden wrote:
:
: On Mon, Oct 15, 2001 at 09:35:58AM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]
:Peter van Heusden writes:
:
: I'm having a look at the Linux 2.4 kernel code, since they
On Tue, Oct 16, 2001 at 09:05:21AM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Matthew
Emmerton writes:
: On Tue, 16 Oct 2001, Peter van Heusden wrote:
:
: On Mon, Oct 15, 2001 at 09:35:58AM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
: In message
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Peter van
Heusden writes:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Doug Hass
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2001 7:28 AM
To: Ted Mittelstaedt
Cc: Leo Bicknell; Jim Bryant; MurrayTaylor; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: FYI
There is depending on the price.
I'm trying to make a bootable CD using the cdboot program that come with
freeBSD in /sys/i386/boot/cdboot. The computer I'm trying to do this on
definately boots other CDs as it has booted several other CDs. However
using a CD I've made using mkisofs and cdboot it gives the error;
As someone else pointed out in this forum, the Hitachi chipset is an
older design. I'm sure that it's probably possible today to design a
sync controller chip that sells for a lot less than the Hitachi part,
perhaps even under the $30 level. Certainly, async chips sell at that
level in
On 16-Oct-01 Thomas Dixon wrote:
I'm trying to make a bootable CD using the cdboot program that come with
freeBSD in /sys/i386/boot/cdboot. The computer I'm trying to do this on
definately boots other CDs as it has booted several other CDs. However
using a CD I've made using mkisofs and
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Simon Dick writes:
: Please don't remove the SurfRider one:
: sio0: SmartLink 5634PCV SurfRider port 0xa400-0xa407 irq 12 at device 10.0 on pci0
: sio0: moving to sio2
: sio2: type 16550A
:
: It was me who submitted the ID for it, it's my main modem :)
Wow! Cool.
:Yes, I removed the option userquota from my fstab file and did a
:quotaoff -a to be perfectly sure.
:
:Here is the profiling output without quotas enabled. Note that the
:first profiling output was done when sys cpu time was jumping from 0 to
:51%, and that this time, due to lack of time for
Matthew Dillon wrote:
This profiled output shows the system completely idle. If
something is locking up eating cpu this profile run didn't
catch it.
Ok, I'll do a new one ASAP, with a system where system cpu time jump is
higher.
Maxime
--
Don't be fooled by cheap finnish
:
:Matthew Dillon wrote:
:
: This profiled output shows the system completely idle. If
: something is locking up eating cpu this profile run didn't
: catch it.
:
:Ok, I'll do a new one ASAP, with a system where system cpu time jump is
:higher.
:
:Maxime
:--
:Don't be fooled by
On Tue, Oct 16, 2001 at 12:42:20PM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote:
ifconfig xxx inet 1.2.3.4 alias
Oh, for sure. That's what I, and the majority of the community, do
now. I think that it's not particularly convenient if you want to
restart the network if you've got 3 or 4 network
In particular, the changes to vfs_subr.c. I've gone over it a bunch of
times and done some significant testing, but it doesn't hurt to have
other eyes take a look at it as well.
-Matt
Matthew Dillon
On Tue, 16 Oct 2001, Doug Hass wrote:
The hardware API or the actual register interface code, is a binary-only
module that is snapped in to SAND. SAND is GPL and is similar to the
FreeBSD Netgraph module - it provides all the higher-level protocol stuff,
like
Frame Relay, PPP, HDLC,
If there's a published interface, we could make a netgraph/SAND interface
module
I think it's better use of hackers' time to look at vendors who already
support FreeBSD, such as SBEI and Cyclades, and see why their support for
FreeBSD, while apparently useful, is behind the functionality they
On Tue, Oct 16, 2001 at 06:35:43PM -0500, Len Conrad wrote:
Unfortunately, I still looking for somebody who actually uses SBEI and
Cyclades T1 boards with FreeBSD.
I ran across them earlier when looking for what T1 boards were out
there. Their boards seem nice, and they do have a driver, in
On Tue, 16 Oct 2001, Len Conrad wrote:
Unfortunately, I still looking for somebody who actually uses SBEI and
Cyclades T1 boards with FreeBSD.
With IBM 2210 series routers going for well under $100 on the used market
I can't see why anyone would opt for a host based solution.
The people with
Howdy,
The SBE Inc wanADAPT-1T1E1 is USD$750. The driver works fine on FreeBSD 4.x.
I have provided them with feedback on their documentation and a patch for
BPF support and they are keen on getting the driver incorporated into the
FreeBSD source tree.
Regards,
Chris Knight
Systems
On Wed, Oct 17, 2001 at 11:00:30AM +1100, Chris Knight wrote:
The SBE Inc wanADAPT-1T1E1 is USD$750. The driver works fine on FreeBSD 4.x.
I have provided them with feedback on their documentation and a patch for
BPF support and they are keen on getting the driver incorporated into the
Howdy,
SBEI have recently put up a new FreeBSD 4.x driver up at
ftp://ftp.sbei.com/pub/OpenSource/FreeBSD/FreeBSD_4.3.tar.gz for their
wanADAPT range of cards, so they're no longer out of date.
Regards,
Chris Knight
Systems Administrator
AIMS Independent Computer Professionals
Tel: +61 3 6334
So which should I use? Why is there two around? I see that truss has
less command line switches than ktrace, but it is a little bit more
standard.
I also see that truss works with the linux syscalls where ktrace does
not
remap the syscall names.
- JimP
--
--- @(#) $Id: dot.signature,v 1.10
Better than a published interface and white paper, we also provide the
direct code itself. You could certainly make a netgraph/SAND interface
module.
Doug
On Tue, 16 Oct 2001, Julian Elischer wrote:
On Tue, 16 Oct 2001, Doug Hass wrote:
The hardware API or the actual register
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Julian Elischer
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2001 5:29 PM
To: Doug Hass
Cc: Ted Mittelstaedt; Jim Bryant; MurrayTaylor;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Alfred
Shippen
Subject: RE: FYI
On Tue, 16 Oct
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Doug Hass
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2001 9:54 AM
To: Ted Mittelstaedt
Cc: Leo Bicknell; Jim Bryant; MurrayTaylor; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: FYI
Let's dispense with all the talk
-Original Message-
From: void [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2001 9:22 AM
To: Ted Mittelstaedt
Cc: Matt Dillon; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: RE: RE: Imagestream WanIC-520 interface cards
On Sat, Oct 13, 2001 at 10:09:44PM -0700, Ted
33 matches
Mail list logo
