On Wed, 12 Dec 2001, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Warner Losh writes:
> >In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Poul-Henning Kamp writes:
> >: 6. Add the "rx50" entry from above to the table to show how simple
> >: that is now.
> >
> >But rx50 also needs some extra p
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Poul-Henning Kamp writes:
: >: 6. Add the "rx50" entry from above to the table to show how simple
: >: that is now.
: >
: >But rx50 also needs some extra processing to handle the software
: >interleave.
:
: I know.
:
: That doesn't change the fact that our flo
On Tuesday, 11 December 2001 at 19:42:30 -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Greg Lehey wrote:
>> Of course. But you're missing the point: ufs is *not* a port, it has
>> been with BSD since the beginning. There is a similar list of items
>> for JFS which would need to be addressed, with the additional
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Warner Losh writes:
>In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Poul-Henning Kamp writes:
>: 6. Add the "rx50" entry from above to the table to show how simple
>: that is now.
>
>But rx50 also needs some extra processing to handle the software
>interleave.
I know.
That d
I think I would rather see people tweaking the heck out of the existing UFS
filesystem and implementing new ways of getting it to go faster.
Implementing a whole new filesystem would probably take a lot of work, and
the performance wouldn't be much better anyways. IMHO, people interested in
ma
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Poul-Henning Kamp writes:
: 6. Add the "rx50" entry from above to the table to show how simple
: that is now.
But rx50 also needs some extra processing to handle the software
interleave.
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Terry Lambert writes:
: Some cards do not have a hardware "I caused an interrupt" register,
: and use a differential (e.g. ring head vs. tail inequal after
: interrupt) to tell if there is work to do. If these cards were to
: share interrupts, then they most likely
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Danny Braniss writes:
: Q: are all interrupt handlers for the shared irq called, or only the
:'correct' one?
You can't tell which card really interrupted. All of them are called.
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-
Greg Lehey wrote:
> Of course. But you're missing the point: ufs is *not* a port, it has
> been with BSD since the beginning. There is a similar list of items
> for JFS which would need to be addressed, with the additional issue of
> the fact that it was not designed for FreeBSD.
I maintain tha
On Tuesday, 11 December 2001 at 1:08:23 -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Greg Lehey wrote:
>>> FS porting to FreeBSD is actually pretty trivial(*), though some
>>> transactioning changes to the FreeBSD VFS layer consumers (the
>>> system calls and NFS server code) would be necessary to make
>>> the
On Dec 11, at 08:17 PM, Paul Chvostek wrote:
>
> I currently have the domains mybsd.(com|net|org|biz). If you'd
> like the patch database to be associated with any or all of those
> domains, I'd be happy to oblige. (The hostname "patch.mybsd.com"
> is pretty. ;> )
Indeed. Quite clever. I'll co
On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 05:48:19AM -0600, D J Hawkey Jr wrote:
>
> No challenge necessary. I, too, believe the general attitude is "Go for it.".
> So I'm going to. It won't be much to look at initially - maybe ever - but
> I'll bring it up and see what happens. It'll take a few days, but I'll pos
I was thinking about looking into it, but I won't have time to start until
the 18th. if you wanna do it, go for it, and I'll wait my turn for the
next thing I can do in the kernel. :-D
Ken
On Tue, 11 Dec 2001, Andrew R. Reiter wrote:
>
> Someone already doing this? If not, I'm down.
>
> On T
On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 07:58:04PM +, Wayne Pascoe wrote:
> Josef Karthauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > It is probably a one man job if that man knows the kernel inside
> > and out in these areas, and has the time and energy to see it
> > through. I'd suggest that you find a much much
On Dec 11, at 05:52 PM, Michael Lucas wrote:
>
> > OK, I'll take the addy (what's the convention, initials? Mine are "djhjr").
> > The freebsd.org mailserver is POP3able, right?
>
> Sorry, I've misspoke here:
>
> A lot of people volunteer to do this sort of thing, and never really
> carry it th
On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 03:54:44PM -0600, D J Hawkey Jr wrote:
> On Dec 11, at 04:23 PM, Michael Lucas wrote:
> NOW what'd I get myself into? The wife is gonna kill me.
Well, yes.
> > Nope. Just an @freebsd.org mail addy and a coupon for economy-size
> > Maalox. Sorry. Put up what you've got.
Ïðåäñòàâèòåëüñòâî Êîìïàíèè Capital Standard Corporation ïðèãëàøàåò Âàñ ïðèíÿòü
ó÷àñòèå â îäíîäíåâíûõ êîíñóëüòàöèîííûõ ñåìèíàðàõ-ïðàêòèêóìàõ äëÿ ýôôåêòèâíîãî è
áûñòðîãî ïîâûøåíèÿ êâàëèôèêàöèè ñîòðóäíèêîâ Âàøåé êîìïàíèè
Îäíîäíåâíûé êîíñóëüòàöèîííûé ñåìèíàð-ïðàêòèêóì «Áèðæåâàÿ òîðãîâëÿ
D J Hawkey Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> types:
> On Dec 11, at 04:23 PM, Michael Lucas wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 03:04:59PM -0600, D J Hawkey Jr wrote:
> > > I am rather hoping there's a bunch of packrats lurking in hacker@ that might
> > > mail me their backports. It'd make a better initial im
On Dec 11, at 04:23 PM, Michael Lucas wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 03:04:59PM -0600, D J Hawkey Jr wrote:
> > I am rather hoping there's a bunch of packrats lurking in hacker@ that might
> > mail me their backports. It'd make a better initial impression.
>
> Let me disabuse you of that not
On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 03:04:59PM -0600, D J Hawkey Jr wrote:
> I am rather hoping there's a bunch of packrats lurking in hacker@ that might
> mail me their backports. It'd make a better initial impression.
Let me disabuse you of that notion right now. You're it. Most people
in -hackers fall i
On Dec 11, at 07:14 PM, Nik Clayton wrote:
>
> I meant that any effort you put in is better than none. For example, if
> you decide to start producing patches for 4.4 that bring in some
> features from -stable (e.g., delayed acks) that's far better than you
> not doing it at all.
As others have
> What I need to know is when this was fixed (assuming it was). I
> tried to look through i386/i386/mem.c, per the messages to find
> the fix, but somewhere between when that message was posted and
> now random (and a few other things) were ripped out of there and
> scattered across several machi
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Poul-Henning Kamp writes:
: In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Dave R
: ufino writes:
:
: >> Most likely he means a per-open(2) opaque datum that is kept in
: >> struct file and passed to the underlying routines.
: >
: >Sorry, unbelievably bad at explaining myself. Per
On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 03:24:14PM -0600, D J Hawkey Jr wrote:
> > Doesn't mean that you need 100% coverage though. If you produce
> > something that only gets in 80% of the patches that could be applied
> > back that's still better than what we have now. And it makes it easier
> > for someone e
On Tue, 11 Dec 2001, Dmitry Mottl wrote:
> This is from /var/run/dmesg.boot
> ==
> sio0: configured irq 4 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0
> sio0 at port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on isa0
> sio0: type 8250
> ==
>
> When I write
> cu -l /dev/cuaa0
>
> system halts (console/network is not working
Josef Karthauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It is probably a one man job if that man knows the kernel inside
> and out in these areas, and has the time and energy to see it
> through. I'd suggest that you find a much much smaller area to
> work on yourself for now though. (Take a look in the
On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 04:01:04AM -0800, Hiten Pandya wrote:
>
> but thats only if three of more people are _really_
> interested in porting it... cause as you know...
> porting an IBM file system (from looks) is not a
> one man job :-)
>
It is probably a one man job if that man knows the ker
Hi
I have problem accessing cuaa0
This is from /var/run/dmesg.boot
==
sio0: configured irq 4 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0
sio0 at port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on isa0
sio0: type 8250
==
When I write
cu -l /dev/cuaa0
system halts (console/network is not working at all)
What happens?
Ho
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "And
rew R. Reiter" writes:
>
>Someone already doing this? If not, I'm down.
You won, you're the first one in my inbox :-)
Ready ?
Steady ?
Start!
:-)
>
>On Tue, 11 Dec 2001, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
>:
>:There exists a patch for adding a mode to our floppy
On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 10:12:35AM -0500, Matthew Emmerton wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Dec 2001, Chad David wrote:
>
> > I sent a message about this to -stable last week, but didn't get any
> > input that resulted in a solution to this problem so...
> >
> > -stable for the last week or more (I did a mak
Someone already doing this? If not, I'm down.
On Tue, 11 Dec 2001, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
:
:There exists a patch for adding a mode to our floppy driver to
:add DEC RX50 media handling.
:
:The crucial part of this is the addition of this line:
:{ 10,2,0xFF,0x10,80, 800,1,FDC_300KBPS,1,0x
There exists a patch for adding a mode to our floppy driver to
add DEC RX50 media handling.
The crucial part of this is the addition of this line:
{ 10,2,0xFF,0x10,80, 800,1,FDC_300KBPS,1,0x2E,1 }, /* 400K DEC RX50 */
But if one examines the fd.c driver, one cannot help but notice that the
On Mon, 10 Dec 2001, Chad David wrote:
> I sent a message about this to -stable last week, but didn't get any
> input that resulted in a solution to this problem so...
>
> -stable for the last week or more (I did a make world last week for
> the first time in over a month) beeps on and off when
>Is this PR-worthy?
Not really; the C99 conformance project is already working on this
(in particular, I am working on scanf).
Bill
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
> My, is it April 1st already? How quickly time flies! December feels
> like it was just yesterday!
>
> - Jordan
Ehe, as far as I can see some people even have taken it seriously :) This
probably shows that when you have to read 300 emails/day, your attention
slowly but constantly leaves you.
Danny Braniss wrote:
>
> > It looks like IRQ sharing is the only issue here.
>
> Q: are all interrupt handlers for the shared irq called, or only the
>'correct' one?
All interrupt handlers are polled -- asked if they have work to do,
on the basis of having caused the interrupt.
Some cards d
that would be nice i suppose.. :-)
BTW, where is this non-GPL code.. i wouldn't mind
putting my hands on it and working on it...
=Hiten
=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Terry Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> > > OK, I load the kernel from the JFS. I mount the
> root FS, whic
Peter Wemm wrote:
> It is not a problem. The *kernel* does not load jfs.ko, it is loader
> itself. There is no reason why a trivial non-gpl jfs reader couldn't be
> written for boot2 and loader if the need was great enough. Or have /boot
> as a seperate file system (eg: UFS or FAT32). We do thi
Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> > OK, I load the kernel from the JFS. I mount the root FS, which
> > is a JFS. I read the module "jfs.ko" from the JFS so that I can
> > mount the root FS, which is a JFS, so I can read the module "jfs.ko"
> > from the JFS so that I can mount the root FS, which is a JFS, s
Hiten Pandya wrote:
>
> >what kind of "mucking" could cause such kind of
> >behaviour?.
>
> this kind of problem did occur to me several times
> with NTL (http://ntl.com/) in UK...
>
> there were installing a Universal Shared Bandwith
> Router in their CO (Central Office), after they
> installe
Lars Eggert wrote:
>
> S. Aeschbacher wrote:
> > This is possible, but I did not verify it (what kind of "mucking"
> > could cause such kind of behaviour?). most of them are "better"
> > residental pipes.
>
> Having a packet filter drop your traffic after you haven't done ARP/DHCP
> in a whil
I use them - where possible - when i have the same kernel for different boxes
and i can configure the differences via klm's.
danny
> Hi Folks,
>
> Hopefully a quick question.
>
> Is there any reason to prefer KLD modules for drivers etc over static
> linking? For example, KLDs are covenient, l
On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 05:48:19AM -0600, D J Hawkey Jr wrote:
> > J D, you have an idea.
>
> "D J", actually. But "Dave" or "Hawk" gets my attention faster.
Mea culpa. Please blame this on four hours sleep, followed by four
hours blindly running Oracle's "adpatch" before the DBAs arrive...
P
hi,
BTW, i am a first timer at porting a file system...
if the proffesionals think that it is not wise or
useful to port the FS (especially IBM's), it is OK,
but, just in case, anyone else (more than three
people)
would like to port this FS to FreeBSD, my target would
be to get it done by Septe
Geez. Don't some of you sleep, either?
On Dec 11, at 06:14 AM, Michael Lucas wrote:
>
> > My current plans are to have several patchfiles, grouped by subject (bugfix
> > and/or enhancement), and subordinately grouped by FreeBSD release:
> >
> > ich_sound-patch-4.2REL.udiff delayed_ack
Hi Folks,
Hopefully a quick question.
Is there any reason to prefer KLD modules for drivers etc over static
linking? For example, KLDs are covenient, loading and unloading for
development but is it a case of using KLD modules for development then
building drivers statically into the kernel when
On Tuesday 11 December 2001 10:26 am, Hiten Pandya wrote:
> > [... Hiten want's to GPL'ify FreeBSD ...]
>
> hi,
> first of all, i would like to clear of some point
> which
> have been taken wrongly.
>
What mail client do you use? It seems to be playing havoc with your
line breaks.
> o My Inten
On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 05:32:06PM -0600, D J Hawkey Jr wrote:
> Don't get me wrong - I don't expect the same level of support from the
> FreeBSD Project than I would from, say, Sybase or Sun. Having said that,
> I think FreeBSD's is outstanding, even compared to some other commercial
> *cough*Mic
> [... Hiten want's to GPL'ify FreeBSD ...]
hi,
first of all, i would like to clear of some point
which
have been taken wrongly.
o My Intentions were never to GPL'ify FreeBSD :-)
o The reason i started this discussion was because
i think JFS/JFS2 would be a nice addition to
FreeBSD like
> It looks like IRQ sharing is the only issue here.
>
Q: are all interrupt handlers for the shared irq called, or only the
'correct' one?
[...]
> But I would still blame software (in particular, the firmware on
> your Meteor).
>
> -- Terry
isn't firmware another word for hardware :-)?
dan
Terry Lambert wrote:
> Greg Lehey wrote:
> > Since then, it has become possible for the loader to load modules
> > before booting the kernel. This means that, theoretically, it would
> > be possible to have a JFS root file system. Given the strong
> > opposition to the GPL in some factions of th
Terry Lambert wrote:
>
> Greg Lehey wrote:
> > Since then, it has become possible for the loader to load modules
> > before booting the kernel. This means that, theoretically, it would
> > be possible to have a JFS root file system. Given the strong
> > opposition to the GPL in some factions of
Danny Braniss wrote:
> well, if it's not software it must be hardware problem (true or false ?)
> the test:
> video capture (using a modified meteor driver)
> doing full size 24bit colour, the meteor would complain about FIFO errors
> (which probably mean that the dma did not finish in tim
Greg Lehey wrote:
> > FS porting to FreeBSD is actually pretty trivial(*), though some
> > transactioning changes to the FreeBSD VFS layer consumers (the
> > system calls and NFS server code) would be necessary to make
> > the journal roll-back function correctly, following a failure.
> >
> > (*)
well, if it's not software it must be hardware problem (true or false ?)
the test:
video capture (using a modified meteor driver)
doing full size 24bit colour, the meteor would complain about FIFO errors
(which probably mean that the dma did not finish in time - correct?)
and sometimes, th
Greg Lehey wrote:
> Since then, it has become possible for the loader to load modules
> before booting the kernel. This means that, theoretically, it would
> be possible to have a JFS root file system. Given the strong
> opposition to the GPL in some factions of the FreeBSD project, I don't
> se
56 matches
Mail list logo
