# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2002-09-23 13:08:04 -0400:
> On Mon, 23 Sep 2002, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> > Now, saying "don't do it" is nice, but I'd like to know why.
> > Why doesn't this work? Also, what documentation (besides the
> > source) is there that covers variable scopes? See the s
In the last episode (Sep 23), Stephen Hocking said:
> I'm wanting to extract data files off the original Quake 1 CD.
Lets just take a look see...
All deice does is join the numbered files together, then execute the
result. quake101.1 and quake101.2 are in self-extracting LHA format;
ports/a
I'm wanting to extract data files off the original Quake 1 CD.
Stephen
--
The views expressed above are not those of PGS Tensor.
"We've heard that a million monkeys at a million keyboards could produce
the Complete Works of Shakespeare; now, thanks to the Internet, w
On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 04:14:53PM +0200, Paul Schenkeveld wrote:
> I've been playing with jails for over 2 years now. I really like
> them but we often use them to run a process as root with reduced
> power only to get access to TCP and UDP ports below 1024.
>
> For many applications however, f
I'm copying this to -hackers as well.
I tried setting the MD_NSECT to 307200 to accomodate my RAM disk, but
according to md(4):
At boot time the md driver will search for pre-loaded modules of type
`md_image' and instantiate a md device for each of these modules. The
type `mfs_ro
* De: Lamont Granquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2002-09-23 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: Just a wild idea ]
>
> On Sun, 22 Sep 2002, Juli Mallett wrote:
> > Maybe just replace all suser(9) uses with MAC credential checks, and
> > install MAC_UNIX by default, which would be set up to behave like
>
On Mon, 23 Sep 2002, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> # [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2002-09-23 10:06:12 -0400:
> > On Mon, 23 Sep 2002, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
>
> > > I'm not a C programmer (thus not really familiar with make), and I'm
I am a C programmer, and one of my strengths is that I know make pretty
well
[sent only to Chad by mistake]
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2002-09-23 10:35:54 -0600:
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 05:35:16PM +0200, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> > > unless you explicitly export things as environment variables,
> > > or set them on a command line when re-invoking Make.
> >
> > i'm not su
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2002-09-23 16:08:11 +0100:
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 04:35:23PM +0200, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> > thanks a lot for your reply. You're right: I'm viewing Makefiles
> > as sequential programs, which obviously (even to me) is not quite
> > true, but I'm having diffic
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 05:05:36PM +0200, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
[... re periodic diffs]
> And, what would the preferred interface be? Most of periodic.conf knobs
> are bools, but I'm not sure
> diff_{context,traditional,unified}_format="{YES,NO}"
> is better than
> diff_format="{context,tradition
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 04:35:23PM +0200, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> thanks a lot for your reply. You're right: I'm viewing Makefiles
> as sequential programs, which obviously (even to me) is not quite
> true, but I'm having difficulty getting rid of this.
Yeah, it takes a bit of gettin
[repost from questions@; no replies received since 2002-09-17]
Hi there,
various /etc/periodic scripts mail root diffs of a few config files etc.
grep on my (quite fresh) STABLE box shows that except for
/etc/periodic/daily/210.backup-aliases, all the diff invocations use the
old format. I have
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2002-09-23 10:06:12 -0400:
> On Mon, 23 Sep 2002, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> > I'm not a C programmer (thus not really familiar with make), and I'm
> > trying to use it for project management (we write apps in php). I've
> > stumbled across a few variable related issues where
On Mon, 23 Sep 2002, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've sent two messages about (p)make to questions@ but have not received
> any replies, so I ask here.
>
> I'm not a C programmer (thus not really familiar with make), and I'm
> trying to use it for project management (we write apps in php). I
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 04:42:25PM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 04:34:18PM +0300, Vladimir Terziev wrote:
> >
> > Hi hackers,
> >
> > I'm implementing a programmme, which writes a big amount of data (using
>write(2)) to a socket.
> > When the communication
Hi,
I've sent two messages about (p)make to questions@ but have not received
any replies, so I ask here.
I'm not a C programmer (thus not really familiar with make), and I'm
trying to use it for project management (we write apps in php). I've
stumbled across a few variable related issues where t
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 04:34:18PM +0300, Vladimir Terziev wrote:
>
> Hi hackers,
>
> I'm implementing a programmme, which writes a big amount of data (using
>write(2)) to a socket.
> When the communication stream has been closed by some reason, during the
>write(2) call, my
Hi hackers,
I'm implementing a programmme, which writes a big amount of data (using
write(2)) to a socket.
When the communication stream has been closed by some reason, during the
write(2) call, my process receives SIGPIPE. I tryed to catch it with signal(3) and
change
Hi,
I'm currently testing stuff on NetBSD kqueue branch, and came over
FreeBSD change in rev. 1.54 of src/sys/fs/fifofs/fifo_vnops.c .
I can't figure out what this change exactly fixes, since
things seem to work fine without the change - the code on NetBSD
kqueue branch uses still fi_readsock alw
Hi,
does this list require subscription to allow posts?
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/eresources.html#ERESOURCES-MAIL
doesn't say so, but neither of my two attempts (before I subscribed) has
shown up in the archives.
--
begin 666 nonexistent.vbs
FreeBSD 4.7-RC
1:55PM
On Sun, 22 Sep 2002, Juli Mallett wrote:
> Maybe just replace all suser(9) uses with MAC credential checks, and
> install MAC_UNIX by default, which would be set up to behave like
> ye olden UNIX... Who knows.
Something like that sounds like a really good idea. I'd like to see this
not only fo
On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 08:29:15AM +0200, John Hay wrote:
> > better to have a definition of what are restricted ports for each jail
> > than to redefine what root is
> >
> > (1024 numbers is only 32 words of bitmask)
>
> Sometimes I think the below 1024 check is outdated. What about a flag
22 matches
Mail list logo
